A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa

Implementation Science

Marie W. Schall¹  Amy Reid¹  Pierre M. Barker² 

[1] Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, USA;University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA

关键词: Quality improvement;    Large-scale spread;    Sustainability;    Adaptive design;    Spread;    Scale-up;   

Others  :  1235784
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-016-0374-x

 received in 2015-04-28, accepted in 2016-01-17,  发布年份 2016

【 摘 要 】

Background

Scaling up complex health interventions to large populations is not a straightforward task. Without intentional, guided efforts to scale up, it can take many years for a new evidence-based intervention to be broadly implemented. For the past decade, researchers and implementers have developed models of scale-up that move beyond earlier paradigms that assumed ideas and practices would successfully spread through a combination of publication, policy, training, and example.

Drawing from the previously reported frameworks for scaling up health interventions and our experience in the USA and abroad, we describe a framework for taking health interventions to full scale, and we use two large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa to illustrate the framework in action. We first identified other scale-up approaches for comparison and analysis of common constructs by searching for systematic reviews of scale-up in health care, reviewing those bibliographies, speaking with experts, and reviewing common research databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) for papers in English from peer-reviewed and “gray” sources that discussed models, frameworks, or theories for scale-up from 2000 to 2014. We then analyzed the results of this external review in the context of the models and frameworks developed over the past 20 years by Associates in Process Improvement (API) and the Institute for Healthcare improvement (IHI). Finally, we reflected on two national-scale improvement initiatives that IHI had undertaken in Ghana and South Africa that were testing grounds for early iterations of the framework presented in this paper.

Results

The framework describes three core components: a sequence of activities that are required to get a program of work to full scale, the mechanisms that are required to facilitate the adoption of interventions, and the underlying factors and support systems required for successful scale-up. The four steps in the sequence include (1) Set-up, which prepares the ground for introduction and testing of the intervention that will be taken to full scale; (2) Develop the Scalable Unit, which is an early testing phase; (3) Test of Scale-up, which then tests the intervention in a variety of settings that are likely to represent different contexts that will be encountered at full scale; and (4) Go to Full Scale, which unfolds rapidly to enable a larger number of sites or divisions to adopt and/or replicate the intervention.

Conclusions

Our framework echoes, amplifies, and systematizes the three dominant themes that occur to varying extents in a number of existing scale-up frameworks. We call out the crucial importance of defining a scalable unit of organization. If a scalable unit can be defined, and successful results achieved by implementing an intervention in this unit without major addition of resources, it is more likely that the intervention can be fully and rapidly scaled. When tying this framework to quality improvement (QI) methods, we describe a range of methodological options that can be applied to each of the four steps in the framework’s sequence.

【 授权许可】

   
2016 Barker et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2001.
• [2]Edwards N, Barker PM. The importance of context in implementation research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014; 67 Suppl 2:S157-62.
• [3]Victora CG, Black RE, Boerma JT, Bryce J. Measuring impact in the Millennium Development Goal era and beyond: a new approach to large-scale effectiveness evaluations. Lancet. 2011; 377:85-95.
• [4]Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Huber TP, Mohr JJ, Godfrey MM, Headrick LA et al.. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high performing front line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28(9):472-93.
• [5]Hanson K, Ranson MK, Oliveira-Cruz V, Mills A. Expanding access to priority health interventions: a framework for understanding the constraints to scaling-up. Journal of International Development. 2003; 15(1):1-14.
• [6]Bergman DA, Beck A. Moving from research to large-scale change in child health care. Academic Pediatrics. 2011; 11(5):360-368.
• [7]Mangham LJ, Hanson K. Scaling up in international health: what are the key issues? Health and Policy Planning. 2010; 25(2):85-96.
• [8]Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001; 79(2):281-315.
• [9]Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Cockerill R, Barnsley J, DiCenso A. A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health-care policy and practice. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs. 2002; 9:7.
• [10]Bradley E, Webster T, Baker D, LaPane K, Lipson D, Stone R et al.. Translating research into practice: speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs (issue brief). The Commonwealth Fund, New York; 2004.
• [11]Cooley L, Kohl R. Scaling up: a conceptual and operational framework. Management Systems International, Washington, D.C; 2004.
• [12]Bate P, Robert G, Bevan H. The next phase of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from social movements? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13(1):62-66.
• [13]Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy and Planning. 2012; 27(5):365-373.
• [14]Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Taylor BS, McCannon CJ, Lindberg C, Lester RT. How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care: understanding the role of self-organization in variation across local contexts. Social Science & Medicine. 2013; 93:194-202.
• [15]A guide for fostering change to scale up effective health services. Management Sciences for Health, Cambridge; 2007.
• [16]Adamou B. Guide for monitoring scale-up of health practices and interventions: MEASURE evaluation. 2013.
• [17]ExpandNet WHO. Practical guidance for scaling up health service innovations. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2009.
• [18]ExpandNet WHO. Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2010.
• [19]ExpandNet WHO. Beginning with the end in mind: planning pilot projects and other programmatic research for successful scaling up. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2011.
• [20]Massoud R. An approach to rapid scale-up using HIV/AIDS treatment and care as an example. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2004.
• [21]Cooley L, Kohl R. Scaling up—from vision to large-scale change: a management framework for practitioners. Management Systems International, Washington D.C; 2006.
• [22]Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009; 4:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Yamey G. Scaling up global health interventions: a proposed framework for success. PLoS Medicine. 2011; 8: Article ID e1001049
• [24]Massoud MR, Donohue KL, McCannon CJ. Options for large-scale spread of simple, high impact interventions. University Research Co. LLC (URC), Bethesda; 2010.
• [25]Deming WE: Elementary principles of the statistical control of quality. Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers; 1950 (out of print).
• [26]The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement (IHI innovation series white paper). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2003.
• [27]McCannon CJ, Schall MW, Calkins DR, Nazem AG. Saving 100,000 lives in US hospitals. BMJ. 2006; 332(7553):1328-1330.
• [28]Nolan K, Schall MW, Erb F, Nolan T. Using a framework for spread: the case of patient access in the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005; 31(6):339-347.
• [29]Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1986.
• [30]Prochaska J, Norcross J, DiClemente C. Changing for good. William Morrow & Co., Inc, New York, NY; 1994.
• [31]Atewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organization Science. 1992; 3(1):1-19.
• [32]Kotler P, Roberto E. Social marketing: strategies for changing public behavior. Free Press, New York, NY; 1989.
• [33]Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. The Free Press, New York; 2003.
• [34]Moen R. A guide to idealized design. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2002.
• [35]McCannon CJ, Perla RJ. Learning networks for sustainable, large-scale improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009; 35(5):286-291.
• [36]Reinertsen JL, Bisognano M, Pugh MD. Seven leadership leverage points for organization-level improvement in health care (second edition) (IHI innovation series white paper). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2008.
• [37]Swenson S, Pugh M, McMullan C, Kabcenell A. Book high impact leadership: improve care, improve the health of populations, and reduce costs (IHI white paper). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2013.
• [38]McCannon CJ, Schall MW, Perla RJ. Planning for scale: a guide for designing large-scale improvement initiatives (IHI innovation series white paper). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2008.
• [39]Schouten LM, Hulscher ME, van Everdingen JJ, Huijsman R, Grol RP. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2008; 336(7659):1491-1494.
• [40]Improvement leaders guide to sustainability and spread. Ancient House Printing Group, Ipswitch; 2002.
• [41]Mate K, Sifrim Z, Provost L. Sustainability of improvement interventions (IHI 90-day R&D project final summary report). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; 2011.
• [42]Langley JL, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan T, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco; 2009.
• [43]Bryce J, Victora C, Habicht J, Vaughan J, Black R. The multi-country evaluation of the integrated management of childhood illness strategy: lessons for the evaluation of public health interventions. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(3):406-415.
• [44]Bryce J, Gilroy K, Jones G, Hazel E, Black R, Victora C. The accelerated child survival and development programme in west Africa: a retrospective evaluation. Lancet. 2010; 375(9714):572-582.
• [45]Barron P. Eliminating mother-to-child HIV transmission in South Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013; 91(1):70-74.
• [46]The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013. United Nations, New York, 2013. http://www. un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/report-2013/mdg-report-2013-english.pdf webcite
• [47]Twum-Danso NAY, Akanlu G, Osafo E, Sodzi-Tettey S, Boadu R, Atinbire S et al.. A nationwide quality improvement project to accelerate Ghana’s progress toward Millenium Development Goal Four: design and implementation progress. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2012; 24(6):601-611.
• [48]Arifeen SE, Hoque DME, Akter T et al.. Effect of the integrated management of childhood illness strategy on childhood mortality and nutrition in a rural area in Bangladesh: a cluster randomized trial. Lancet. 2009; 374:393-403.