Employers’ views of promoting walking to work: a qualitative study

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Sunita Procter¹  Suzanne Audrey¹ 

[1] University of Bristol, School for Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK

关键词: Active travel;    Workplace;    Interview;    Qualitative research;    Employment;    Walking;   

Others  :  1136033
DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-015-0174-8

 received in 2014-05-07, accepted in 2015-01-29,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Physical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity and some cancers. It is currently recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate physical activity in bouts of 10 minutes or more throughout the week. One way for adults in employment to incorporate exercise into their daily routine is to walk during the commute to and from work. Schemes to promote active travel require the support of employers and managers but there is a lack of research focusing on their views and experiences of promoting walk to work schemes.

Methods

This study presents the findings from in-depth, digitally recorded interviews with 29 employers from a range of small, medium and large workplaces who participated in a feasibility study to develop and test an employer-led scheme to promote walking to work. All recordings were fully transcribed. The Framework approach for data management was used to aid qualitative analysis. Interview transcripts were read and reread, and textual data were placed in charts focusing on facilitators, barriers, and possibilities for employers to promote walking to work.

Results

A range of perspectives were identified, from active support through uncertainty and cynicism to resistance. The majority of employers who took part in the study were unclear about how to give practical support for employees who walk to work, but appeared more confident about ideas to promote cycling. Some employers were concerned about how their attempts to promote walking might be perceived by employees. Furthermore, the main business of their organisation took priority over other activities.

Conclusions

It is clear that employers need more evidence of the effectiveness of walk to work schemes, and the benefits to employers of committing resources to them. Furthermore, employers need support in creating an authentic, health promoting ethos within the workplace to enhance positive relationships and reduce tensions that may arise when promoting active travel initiatives.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Audrey and Procter; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of Health: Start Active, Stay Active. A Report on Physical Activity for Health from the Four Home countries’ Chief Medical Officers. Department of Health, London; 2011.
• [2]Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al.: Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sport Exer 2007, 39(8):1423-34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17762377
• [3]The Information Centre: Health Survey for England 2008: Volume 1 Physical Activity and Fitness. The information Centre for health and social care, London; 2010.
• [4]Townsend N, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Scarborough P, Foster C, Rayner M: Physical Activity Statistics. British Heart Foundation, London; 2012.
• [5]Morris J, Hardman A: Walking to health. Sports Med 1997, 23:306-32.
• [6]Department for Transport. Local Area Walking and Cycling Statistics: England 2012/13. Statistical Release. Department for Transport, 29 April 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/306778/walking-and-cycling-statistics-release.pdf.
• [7]Office for National Statistics. 2011 Census Analysis - Distance Travelled to Work, 26 March 2014. Available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/distance-travelled-to-work/index.html.
• [8]Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al.: Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sport Exer 2000, 32(Suppl):S498-516.
• [9]Audrey S, Procter S, Cooper A: The contribution of walking to work to adult physical activity levels: a cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014, 11:37. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-37 BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Sustrans. http://www.sustrans.org.uk/ Last accessed 3 October 2014.
• [11]Cyclescheme. http://www.cyclescheme.co.uk/ Last accessed 3 October 2014.
• [12]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE: Promoting Physical Activity in the Workplace. NICE Public Health Guidance 13. Department of Health, London; 2008.
• [13]Hillsdon M, Foster C, Cavill N, Crombie H, Naidoo B: The Effectiveness of Public Health Interventions for Increasing Physical Activity Among Adults: A Review of Reviews. Health Development Agency, London; 2005.
• [14]Kahn E, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al.: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22(suppl 4):73-106.
• [15]Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M: Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2005, 2:CD003180. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003180.pub2
• [16]Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M: Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. Brit Med J 2004, 329:763-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55
• [17]Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothrie H, Call N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF, et al.: Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. Brit Med J 2007, 334:1204. doi:10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE
• [18]Dugdill L, Brettle A, Hulme C, McCluskey S, Long AF: Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Int J Workplace Health Manag 2008, 1:20-40. doi:10.1108/17538350810865578
• [19]Hing Lo S, van Breukelen G, Peters G-J, Kok G: Pro-environmental travel behaviour among office workers: a qualitative study of individual and organizational determinants. Transport Res A-Pol 2013, 56:11-22.
• [20]Connell J, Granger S: Exploring attitudes to corporate fitness in Jersey: employer and employee perspectives. Manag Leis 2002, 7:176-93.
• [21]Adams EJ: Evaluation of Living Streets’ Walking Works Pathfinder Employers Scheme. BHF National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 2012.
• [22]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. Brit Med J.2008;337(a1655). doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655.
• [23]National Institute for Health Research. http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/phr/10300104.
• [24]Procter S, Mutrie N, Davis A, Audrey S: Views and experiences of behaviour change techniques to encourage walking to work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:868. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-868 BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Behaviour Change: Individual Approaches. NICE Public Health Guidance 49. NHS, Manchester; 2014.
• [26]Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
• [27]Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage, London; 2003.
• [28]Oulton N, Sebastiá-Barriel M: Working Paper No. 470. Long and Short-Term Effects of the Financial Crisis on Labour Productivity, Capital and Output. Bank of England, London; 2013.
• [29]Met Office. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2012/second-wettest-summer.
• [30]Chan CB, Ryan DA: Assessing the effects of weather conditions on physical activity participation using objective measures. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6:2639-54.
• [31]Rich C, Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C. Seasonal variation in accelerometer determined sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children: A review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9(49). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-49.
• [32]McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Quart 1988, 15:351-77.
• [33]Newson C: Making Travel Plans Work: Lessons from UK Case Studies. Department for Transport, London; 2002.
• [34]Local government association. Changing behaviours in public health. To nudge or to shove? Local government association. London; 2013. http://www.local.gov.uk/documents/10180/11463/Changing+behaviours+in+public+health+-+to+nudge+or+to+shove/5ae3b9c8-e476-495b-89b4-401d70e1e2aa.
• [35]Martin A, Suhrcke M, Ogilvie A: Financial incentives to promote active travel. An evidence review and economic framework. Am J Prev Med 2012, 43(6):e45-57.
• [36]Mutrie N, Carney C, Blamey A, Crawford F, Aitchison T, Whitelaw A: ‘Walk in to work Out’: a randomised controlled trial of self- help intervention to promote active commuting. J Epidemiol Commun H 2002, 56:407-12.
• [37]Panter J, Desousa C, Ogilvie D: Incorporating walking or cycling into car journeys to and from work: the role of individual, workplace and environmental characteristics. Prev Med 2013, 56:211-7. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.014
• [38]Quintiliani L, Sattelmair J, Sorensen G. The workplace as a setting for interventions to improve diet and promote physical activity. Background paper prepared for the WHO/WEF Joint Event on Preventing Noncommunicable Diseases in the Workplace. Dalian/China, September 2007. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/Quintiliani-workplace-as-setting.pdf.