期刊论文详细信息
Health Research Policy and Systems
The role of policy actors and contextual factors in policy agenda setting and formulation: maternal fee exemption policies in Ghana over four and a half decades
Irene Akua Agyepong1  Han van Dijk2  Augustina Koduah2 
[1] Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, University of Ghana, School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana;Wageningen UR (University & Research centre), Sociology of Development and Change, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词: Policy formulation;    Policy agenda setting;    Policy actors;    Maternal health services;    Fee exemption;    Context;   
Others  :  1217381
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-015-0016-9
 received in 2014-11-28, accepted in 2015-05-15,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Development of health policy is a complex process that does not necessarily follow a particular format and a predictable trajectory. Therefore, agenda setting and selecting of alternatives are critical processes of policy development and can give insights into how and why policies are made. Understanding why some policy issues remain and are maintained whiles others drop off the agenda is an important enquiry. This paper aims to advance understanding of health policy agenda setting and formulation in Ghana, a lower middle-income country, by exploring how and why the maternal (antenatal, delivery and postnatal) fee exemption policy agenda in the health sector has been maintained over the four and half decades since a ‘free antenatal care in government facilities’ policy was first introduced in October 1963.

Methods

A mix of historical and contemporary qualitative case studies of nine policy agenda setting and formulation processes was used. Data collection methods involved reviews of archival materials, contemporary records, media content, in-depth interviews, and participant observation. Data was analysed drawing on a combination of policy analysis theories and frameworks.

Results

Contextual factors, acting in an interrelating manner, shaped how policy actors acted in a timely manner and closely linked policy content to the intended agenda. Contextual factors that served as bases for the policymaking process were: political ideology, economic crisis, data about health outcomes, historical events, social unrest, change in government, election year, austerity measures, and international agendas. Nkrumah’s socialist ideology first set the agenda for free antenatal service in 1963. This policy trajectory taken in 1963 was not reversed by subsequent policy actors because contextual factors and policy actors created a network of influence to maintain this issue on the agenda. Politicians over the years participated in the process to direct and approve the agenda. Donors increasingly gained agenda access within the Ghanaian health sector as they used financial support as leverage.

Conclusion

Influencers of policy agenda setting must recognise that the process is complex and intertwined with a mix of political, evidence-based, finance-based, path-dependent, and donor-driven processes. Therefore, influencers need to pay attention to context and policy actors in any strategy.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Koduah et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150706091641845.pdf 533KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Green-Pedersen C, Wilkerson J. How agenda-setting attributes shape politics: Basic dilemmas, problem attention and health politics developments in Denmark and the US. J Eur Publ Pol. 2006; 13:1039-52.
  • [2]Nelson BJ. Making an issue of child abuse: political agenda setting for social problems. University of Chicago Press; 1986
  • [3]Gilson L, Raphaely N. The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Pol Plann. 2008; 23:294-307.
  • [4]Shiffman J, Okonofua FE. The state of political priority for safe motherhood in Nigeria. BJOG. 2007; 114:127-33.
  • [5]Agyepong IA, Kodua A, Adjei S, Adam T. When ‘solutions of yesterday become problems of today’: crisis-ridden decision making in a complex adaptive system (CAS)—the Additional Duty Hours Allowance in Ghana. Health Pol Plann. 2012;27:iv20–31.
  • [6]Mayhew SH. The impact of decentralisation on sexual and reproductive health services in Ghana. Reprod Health Matters. 2003; 11:74-87.
  • [7]Cassels A, Janovsky K. Better health in developing countries: are sector-wide approaches the way of the future? Lancet. 1998; 352:1777-9.
  • [8]Birungi H, Addai E, Addico G, Jehu-Appiah C, Nyarko P, Askew I et al.. Health Sector Reforms in Ghana and Implication for Reproductive Health Priority Setting. FRONTIERS Final Report. Population Council, Washington DC; 2006.
  • [9]Mayhew SH, Adjei S. Sexual and reproductive health: challenges for priority-setting in Ghana’s health reforms. Health Pol Plann. 2004; 19:i50-61.
  • [10]Kpessa MW. The politics of public policy in Ghana: from closed circuit bureaucrats to citizenry engagement. J Dev Soc. 2011; 27:29-56.
  • [11]Agyepong I, Adjei S. Public social policy development and implementation: a case study of the Ghana National Health Insurance scheme. Health Pol Plann. 2008; 23:150-60.
  • [12]Grindle MS, Thomas JW. Public choices and policy change: the political economy of reform in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD; 1991.
  • [13]Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2002.
  • [14]Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2009.
  • [15]Scott J. A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Polity Press, Cambridge; 1990.
  • [16]Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman classics in political science. Longman, London; 2002.
  • [17]Erasmus E, Gilson L. How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation. Health Pol Plann. 2008; 23:361-8.
  • [18]Mintzberg H. Power in and around organizations. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey; 1983.
  • [19]Konotey-Ahulu FID, Ocloo E, Addy PM, Bamford AM, Ennin C. Report of the committee appointed to investigate hospital fees. Government of Ghana, Accra; 1970.
  • [20]Rimmer D. Ghana's political economy, 1950–1990. Pergamon, Oxford; 1992.
  • [21]Graphic Reporter. Hospital fees: no charge. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communications Group Limited; 1957. p. 1.
  • [22]Graphic Reporter: Free health service. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communications Group Limited; 1958. p. 1.
  • [23]Graphic Reporter. Free medical service soon. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communications Group Limited; 1962. p. 13.
  • [24]Sowa NK. Adjustment in Africa: lessons from Ghana. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London; 1996.
  • [25]Index Mundi. http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/ghana/gni-per-capita.
  • [26]Graphic Reporter. Hospital fees-new rate out next year. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1967. p. 15.
  • [27]Therson-Cofie L. New hospital charges plan. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1969. p. 5.
  • [28]Hospital Fees Decree 360. Ghana Publishing Corporation, Accra; 1969.
  • [29]Fosu AK. Emerging Africa: the case of Ghana. Nairobi, Africa Economic Research Consortium; 2001.
  • [30]Graphic Reporter. New Hospital Fees. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1970. p. 3.
  • [31]Hospital Fees Act 387. Ghana Publishing Corporation, Accra; 1971.
  • [32]Graphic Reporter. Hospital fees – Views invited. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1973. p. 16.
  • [33]A Correspondent. Review of the report of the hospital fees committee. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1974. p. 10.
  • [34]Owusu-Ansah MM. Let’s have free medical care. In Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1973. p. 1.
  • [35]Graphic Reporter. Let’s pay hospital fees – Nyante. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1973. p. 3
  • [36]Nyakey MMY. Hospital Fees. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1974. p. 7.
  • [37]Carbone G. Democratic demands and social policies: the politics of health reform in Ghana. J Mod Afr Stud. 2011; 49:381-408.
  • [38]Graphic Reporter. Health service may collapse. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1981. p. 8.
  • [39]Debrah F. Let health service dept be autonomous. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1981. p. 8.
  • [40]Waddington C, Enyimayew KA. A price to pay, part 2: The impact of user charges in the Volta region of Ghana. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1990; 5:287-312.
  • [41]Rosenfield A, Maine D. Maternal mortality – a neglected tragedy: where is the M in MCH? Lancet. 1985; 326:83-5.
  • [42]Campbell OMR. What are maternal health policies in developing countries and who drives them? A review of the last half-century. ITG Press, Antwerp, Belgium; 2001.
  • [43]Odoi-Agyarko Henrietta. Profile of reproductive health situation in Ghana. 2003. http://www.afro.who.int/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1805.
  • [44]Government of Ghana. Hospital Fees Regulations L.I. 1277. Accra: Ghana Publishing Corporation; 1983.
  • [45]Loxley J. Structural adjustment in Africa: reflections on Ghana and Zambia. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 1990; 47:8-27.
  • [46]Graphic Reporter. New hospital fees meant to stop further decline. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1985. p. 1–5
  • [47]Government of Ghana. Hospital Fees Regulation, 1985, L.I. 1313. Accra: Ghana Publishing Corporation; 1985
  • [48]Graphic Reporter. President’s Sessional Address. In: Daily Graphic. Accra: Graphic Communication Group Limited; 1997. p. 7–13
  • [49]Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. Calverton, MA: Macro International Inc.; 1994.
  • [50]Health Sector 5-Year Programme of Work. Ministry of Health, Accra; 1996.
  • [51]Aligning exemption policy and practice with poverty reduction goals: A report of the annual health sector review 2002. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2003.
  • [52]Bank of Ghana. The HIPC Initiative and Ghana’s External Debt http://www.bog.gov.gh/privatecontent/Research/Sector%20Studies/HIPC%20Paper2005%20final-main.pdf.
  • [53]Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 1998. Calverton, MA: Macro International Inc.; 1999
  • [54]The health of the nation: reflection on the first five year health sector programme of work (1997–2001). Ministry of Health, Accra; 2001.
  • [55]National Development Planning Commission. Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy (GPRS 1). Accra: National Development Planning Commission; 2003
  • [56]Ghana Health Sector Annual Programme of Work, 2004. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2004.
  • [57]Aide Memoire; Joint Ministry of Health – Health Partners Summit. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2004.
  • [58]Ministry of Health GoG, United Nations Country Team Ghana. Ghana MDG acceleration framework and country action plan. Accra: Maternal Health; 2011.
  • [59]Ghana Health Sector 2005 Programme of Work: Bridging the inequality gap, addressing emerging challenges with child survival. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2005.
  • [60]Witter S, Arhinful DK, Kusi A, Zakariah-Akoto S. The experience of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care. Reprod Health Matters. 2007; 15:61-71.
  • [61]Garshong B, Ansah E, Dakpallah G, Huijts I, Adjei S. A study on factors affecting the implementation of the exemption policy in Ghana. Bulletin Health Inform. 2002; 1:22-31.
  • [62]A review of the Ghana Health Sector's pro-poor agenda. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2004.
  • [63]Nyonator F, Kutzin J. Health for some? The effects of user fees in the Volta Region of Ghana. Health Pol Plann. 1999; 14:329-41.
  • [64]Witter S, Adjei S. Start-stop funding, its causes and consequences: a case study of the delivery exemptions policy in Ghana. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2007; 22:133-43.
  • [65]Independent review: Health Sector Programme of Work 2007. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2008.
  • [66]Aide Memoire; Joint Ministry of Health and Development Partners Summit 21-23rd April. Ministry of Health, Accra; 2008.
  • [67]Shiffman J, Smith S. Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2007; 370:1370-9.
  • [68]Pelletier DL, Menon P, Ngo T, Frongillo EA, Frongillo D. The nutrition policy process: The role of strategic capacity in advancing national nutrition agendas. Food Nutr Bull. 2011; 32:59S-69S.
  • [69]Kay A. A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Publ Admin. 2005; 83:553-71.
  • [70]Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2000; 94:251-67.
  • [71]Young K, Ashby D, Boaz A, Grayson L. Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Soc Policy Soc. 2002; 1:215-24.
  • [72]Seddoh A, Akor S. Policy initiation and political levers in health policy: lessons from Ghana’s health insurance. BMC Publ Health. 2012; 12:S10. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [73]Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2007. Calverton, MA: GSS, Ghana Health Service, and Macro International; 2009.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:32次