Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom–Africa capacity strengthening award scheme

Health Research Policy and Systems

Imelda Bates¹  Helen Smith³  Janet Njelesani²  Laura Dean¹ 

[1] Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK;New York Institute of Technology (NYIT), New York, USA;Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

关键词: Mixed methods;    Low- and middle-income countries;    International collaborations;    Capacity strengthening;   

Others  :  1235202
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-015-0071-2

 received in 2015-06-25, accepted in 2015-12-09,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Research partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) are a leading model in research capacity strengthening activities. Although numerous frameworks and guiding principles for effective research partnerships exist, few include the perspective of the LMIC partner. This paper draws out lessons for establishing and maintaining successful research collaborations, based on partnership dynamics, from the perspectives of both HIC and LMIC stakeholders through the evaluation of a research capacity strengthening partnership award scheme.

Methods

A mixed-method retrospective evaluation approach was used. Initially, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all award holders, which focused on partnership outputs and continuation. Fifty individuals were purposively selected to participate in interviews or focus group discussions from 12 different institutions in HICs and LMICs; the sample included the research investigators, research assistants, laboratory scientists and post-doctoral students. The evaluation collected data on critical elements of research partnership dynamics such as research outputs, nature of the partnership, future plans and research capacity. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data were analysed using an iterative framework approach.

Results

The majority of United Kingdom and African award holders stated they would like to pursue future collaborations together. Key aspects within partnerships that appeared to influence this were; the perceived benefits of the partnership at the individual and institutional level such as publication of papers or collaborative grants; ability to influence ‘research culture’ and instigate critical thinking among mid-career researchers; previous working relationships, for example supervisor-student relationships; and equity within partnerships linked to partnership formation and experience of United Kingdom partners within LMICs. Factors which may hinder development of long term partnerships were also identified such as financial control or differing expectations of partners.

Conclusions

This paper provides evidence of what encourages international research partnerships for capacity strengthening to continue past award tenure, from the perspective of researchers in high and LMICs. Although every partnership is unique and individual experiences subjective, this paper provides extension and support of key principles and mechanisms that can contribute to successful research partnerships between researchers.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Dean et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:276. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Cole D, Boyd A, Aslanyan G, Bates I. Indicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower and middle income countries: a qualitative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014; 12:13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Mayhew S, Doherty J, Pitayarangsarit S. Developing health systems research capacities through north–south partnership: an evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008; 6:8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]ESSENCE on Health Research. Seven principles for strengthening research capacity in low and middle income countries: Simple ideas in a complex world. 2014. TDR for research on diseases of poverty. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/seven-principles/en/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
• [5]Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries. A guide for transboundary research partnerships: 7 Questions. 2012. Swiss Academy of Sciences. http://www.naturalsciences.ch/service/publications/9505-a-guide-for-transboundary-research-partnerships-2nd-edition---2014-. Accessed 5 May 2015.
• [6]Costello A, Zumla A. Moving to research partnerships in developing countries. BMJ. 2000; 321(7264):827-9.
• [7]Syed S, Dadwal V, Rutter P, Storr J, Hightower J, Gooden R et al.. Developed- developing country partnerships: benefits to developed countries? Global Health. 2012; 8:17. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Airhihenbuwa C, Shisana O, Zungu N, BeLue R, Makofani D, Shefer T et al.. Research capacity building: A US-South African partnership. Glob Health Promot. 2011; 18:35-94.
• [9]de-Graft Aikins A, Arhinful D, Pitchforth E, Ogedegbe G, Allotey P, Agyemang C. Establishing and sustaining research partnerships in Africa: A case study of the UK-Africa Academic Partnership on Chronic Disease. Global Health. 2012; 8:29. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Njelesani J, Stevens M, Cleaver S, Mwambwa L, Nixon S. International research partnerships in occupational therapy: A Canadian-Zambian case study. Occup Ther Int. 2013; 20(2):78-87.
• [11]Bradley M. North–south research partnerships: Challenges, responses and trends. A literature review and annotated bibliography. Working Paper 1. In IDRC Canadian Partnerships Working Paper Series. International Development Research Centre. 2007. https://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/handle/10625/36539. Accessed 5 May 2015.
• [12]Bradley M. On the agenda: North–South research partnerships and agenda-setting processes. Develop Practice. 2008; 18:673-85.
• [13]Ovretveit J. Evaluating Health Interventions. Open University Press, Maidenhead; 2003.
• [14]Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley, New York; 2000.
• [15]Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. Sage Publications, London; 2003.
• [16]Afsana K, Habte D, Hatfield J, Murphy J, Neufeld V. Partnership Assessment Toolkit. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research. 2009. http://www.ccghr.ca/resources/partnerships-and-networking/partnership-assessment-tool/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
• [17]North–South research partnerships: Issues and challenges Trivandrum expert meeting report 1999. Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council, The Hague; 2001.
• [18]Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, Dunne M, Adu-Yeboah C. Exploring the fault lines of cross-cultural collaborative research. Compare. 2009; 39:769-82.
• [19]Baud I. North–South partnerships in development research: an institutional approach. Int J Technol Manage Sustainable Dev. 2002; 1:153-70.
• [20]Sawyerr A. African universities and the challenge of research capacity development. J Higher Educ in Africa. 2004; 2:211-40.