期刊论文详细信息
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control
Thomas Haak2  Jörg Huber1  Bernhard Kulzer2  Norbert Hermanns2  Annika Gahr2  Andreas Schmitt2 
[1] The University of Northampton, Boughton Green Rd, Northampton NN2 7AL, UK;Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), German Diabetes Center Mergentheim, Theodor-Klotzbücher-Str. 12, D-97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany
关键词: Psychometric instrument;    Assessment;    Measurement;    Hyperglycaemia;    HbA1c;    Metabolic control;    Self-care behaviour;    Self-management;    Diabetes care;   
Others  :  823339
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-11-138
 received in 2013-02-28, accepted in 2013-08-12,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Though several questionnaires on self-care and regimen adherence have been introduced, the evaluations do not always report consistent and substantial correlations with measures of glycaemic control. Small ability to explain variance in HbA1c constitutes a significant limitation of an instrument’s use for scientific purposes as well as clinical practice. In order to assess self-care activities which can predict glycaemic control, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) was designed.

Methods

A 16 item questionnaire to assess self-care activities associated with glycaemic control was developed, based on theoretical considerations and a process of empirical improvements. Four subscales, ‘Glucose Management’ (GM), ‘Dietary Control’ (DC), ‘Physical Activity’ (PA), and ‘Health-Care Use’ (HU), as well as a ‘Sum Scale’ (SS) as a global measure of self-care were derived. To evaluate its psychometric quality, 261 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were assessed with the DSMQ and an established analogous scale, the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA). The DSMQ’s item and scale characteristics as well as factorial and convergent validity were analysed, and its convergence with HbA1c was compared to the SDSCA.

Results

The items showed appropriate characteristics (mean item-total-correlation: 0.46 ± 0.12; mean correlation with HbA1c: -0.23 ± 0.09). Overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was good (0.84), consistencies of the subscales were acceptable (GM: 0.77; DC: 0.77; PA: 0.76; HU: 0.60). Principal component analysis indicated a four factor structure and confirmed the designed scale structure. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated appropriate fit of the four factor model. The DSMQ scales showed significant convergent correlations with their parallel SDSCA scales (GM: 0.57; DC: 0.52; PA: 0.58; HU: n/a; SS: 0.57) and HbA1c (GM: -0.39; DC: -0.30; PA: -0.15; HU: -0.22; SS: -0.40). All correlations with HbA1c were significantly stronger than those obtained with the SDSCA.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence that the DSMQ is a reliable and valid instrument and enables an efficient assessment of self-care behaviours associated with glycaemic control. The questionnaire should be valuable for scientific analyses as well as clinical use in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Schmitt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140713002717431.pdf 273KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Spellman CW: Achieving glycemic control: cornerstone in the treatment of patients with multiple metabolic risk factors. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2009, 109(Suppl 5):8-13.
  • [2]Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P, Cull CA, Holman RR, Egger M, Krähenbühl S, Diem P: Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2006, 152:27-38.
  • [3]Akalin S, Berntorp K, Ceriello A, Das AK, Kilpatrick ES, Koblik T, Munichoodappa CS, Pan CY, Rosenthall W, Shestakova M, Wolnik B, Woo V, Yang WY, Yilmaz MT, Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control: Intensive glucose therapy and clinical implications of recent data: a consensus statement from the Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control. Int J Clin Pract 2009, 63:1421-1425.
  • [4]Johnson SB: Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence. Diabetes Care 1992, 15:1658-1867.
  • [5]Albisser AM, Harris RI, Albisser JB, Sperlich M: The impact of initiatives in education, self-management training, and computer-assisted self-care on outcomes in diabetes disease management. Diabetes Technol Ther 2001, 3:571-579.
  • [6]Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, Freedman ZR, Deci EL: Testing a Self-Determination Theory Process Model for Promoting Glycemic Control Through Diabetes Self-Management. Health Psychol 2004, 23:58-66.
  • [7]Piette JD, Richardson C, Valenstein M: Addressing the needs of patients with multiple chronic illnesses: the case of diabetes and depression. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10:152-162.
  • [8]Peyrot M, McMurry JF Jr, Kruger DF: A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence. J Health Soc Behav 1999, 40:141-158.
  • [9]Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, Collins EM, Serpa L, Mimiaga MJ, Safren SA: Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:2398-2403.
  • [10]Gonzalez JS, Delahanty LM, Safren SA, Meigs JB, Grant RW: Differentiating symptoms of depression from diabetes-specific distress: relationships with self-care in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2008, 51:1822-1825.
  • [11]Aikens JE, Perkins DW, Lipton B, Piette JD: Longitudinal analysis of depressive symptoms and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32:1177-1181.
  • [12]Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA: The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010, 33:1034-1036.
  • [13]Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U: Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care 2010, 33:23-28.
  • [14]Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE: Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:934-942.
  • [15]Pibernik-Okanovic M, Grgurevic M, Begic D, Szabo S, Metelko Z: Interaction of depressive symptoms and diabetes-related distress with glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2008, 25:1252-1254.
  • [16]Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 51:1173-1182.
  • [17]Lustman PJ, Clouse RE, Ciechanowski PS, Hirsch IB, Freedland KE: Depression-related hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes: a mediational approach. Psychosom Med 2005, 67:195-199.
  • [18]Glasgow RE: Social-environmental factors in diabetes: Barriers to diabetes self-care. In Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Edited by Chur BC. Switzerland: Harwood Academic; 1994:335-349.
  • [19]Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE: Assessing diabetes self-management: the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire. In Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Edited by Chur BC. Switzerland: Harwood Academic; 1994:351-375.
  • [20]Wang RH, Lin LY, Cheng CP, Hsu MT, Kao CC: The psychometric testing of the diabetes health promotion self-care scale. J Nurs Res 2012, 20:122-130.
  • [21]Lee NP, Fisher WP Jr: Evaluation of the Diabetes Self-Care Scale. J Appl Meas 2005, 6:366-381.
  • [22]Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE: The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:943-950.
  • [23]Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri R, Skinner TC, Trevena L: Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? Diabet Med 2009, 26:425-436.
  • [24]Bastos F, Severo M, Lopes C: Psychometric analysis of diabetes self-care scale (translated and adapted to Portuguese). Acta Med Port 2007, 20:11-20.
  • [25]Choi EJ, Nam M, Kim SH, Park CG, Toobert DJ, Yoo JS, Chu SH: Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure. Int J Nurs Stud 2011, 48:333-337.
  • [26]Michels MJ, Coral MH, Sakae TM, Damas TB, Furlanetto LM: Questionnaire of Diabetes Self-Care Activities: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of psychometric properties. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2010, 54:644-651.
  • [27]Vincent D, McEwen MM, Pasvogel A: The validity and reliability of a Spanish version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire. Nurs Res 2008, 57:101-106.
  • [28]Kav S, Akman A, Dogan N, Tarakci Z, Bulut Y, Hanoglu Z: Turkish validity and reliability of the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Nurs 2010, 19:2933-2935.
  • [29]Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, Greene SA, MacDonald TM, Newton RW: Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Lancet 1997, 350:1505-1510.
  • [30]Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Evans JM, DARTS/MEMO collaboration: Adherence to insulin and its association with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. QJM 2007, 100:345-350.
  • [31]Lawrence DB, Ragucci KR, Long LB, Parris BS, Helfer LA: Relationship of oral antihyperglycemic (sulfonylurea or metformin) medication adherence and hemoglobin A1c goal attainment for HMO patients enrolled in a diabetes disease management program. J Manag Care Pharm 2006, 12:466-471.
  • [32]Krapek K, King K, Warren SS, George KG, Caputo DA, Mihelich K, Holst EM, Nichol MB, Shi SG, Livengood KB, Walden S, Lubowski TJ: Medication adherence and associated hemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother 2004, 38:1357-1362.
  • [33]Cohen HW, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Rivera CM, Walker EA: Measurements of medication adherence in diabetic patients with poorly controlled HbA(1c). Diabet Med 2010, 27:210-216.
  • [34]Thomas D, Elliott EJ: Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, diets for diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009., 1CD006296
  • [35]Thomas DE, Elliott EJ: The use of low-glycaemic index diets in diabetes control. Br J Nutr 2010, 104:797-802.
  • [36]Wikblad K, Montin K, Wibell L: Metabolic control, residual insulin secretion and self-care behaviours in a defined group of patients with type 1 diabetes. Ups J Med Sci 1991, 96:47-61.
  • [37]Schütt M, Kern W, Krause U, Busch P, Dapp A, Grziwotz R, Mayer I, Rosenbauer J, Wagner C, Zimmermann A, Kerner W, Holl RW, DPV Initiative: Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006, 114:384-388.
  • [38]Malanda UL, Welschen LM, Riphagen II, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Bot SD: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012., 1CD005060
  • [39]Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Rattanasookchit S: Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: an update. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009, 11:775-784.
  • [40]Allemann S, Houriet C, Diem P, Stettler C: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2009, 25:2903-2913.
  • [41]St John A, Davis WA, Price CP, Davis TM: The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose: a review of recent evidence. J Diabetes Complications 2010, 24:129-141.
  • [42]Hirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008, 10:419-439.
  • [43]Polonsky WH, Fisher L: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients: right answer, but wrong question: self-monitoring of blood glucose can be clinically valuable for noninsulin users. Diabetes Care 2013, 36:179-182.
  • [44]Speight J, Browne JL, Furler J: Challenging evidence and assumptions: is there a role for self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes not using insulin? Curr Med Res Opin 2013, 29:161-168.
  • [45]Boulé NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ: Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001, 286:1218-1227.
  • [46]Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA: Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006., 3CD002968
  • [47]Tonoli C, Heyman E, Roelands B, Buyse L, Cheung SS, Berthoin S, Meeusen R: Effects of different types of acute and chronic (training) exercise on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Sports Med 2012, 42:1059-1080.
  • [48]Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Noël PH, Larme AC: Continuity of care, self-management behaviors, and glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Med Care 2002, 40:137-144.
  • [49]Sidorenkov G, Voorham J, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, de Zeeuw D, Denig P: Association Between Performance Measures and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Diabetes in a Community-wide Primary Care Cohort. Med Care 2013, 51:172-179.
  • [50]Schectman JM, Schorling JB, Voss JD: Appointment adherence and disparities in outcomes among patients with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:1685-1687.
  • [51]Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahem AT, Ferrara A, Liu JY, Selby JV: Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: An opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Med Care 2004, 42:110-115.
  • [52]Nathan DM, Turgeon H, Regan S: Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time. Diabetologia 2007, 50:2239-2244.
  • [53]Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ, the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) Study Group: Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:1473-1478.
  • [54]Bradley C: Translation of questionnaires for use in different languages and cultures. In Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Edited by Chur BC. Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1994:43-55.
  • [55]Marsh HW, Hocevar D: Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 1985, 97:562-582.
  • [56]Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990, 107:238-246.
  • [57]Browne MW, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models. Edited by Bollen KA, Long JS. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1993:136-162.
  • [58]Meng X, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB: Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 1992, 111:172-175.
  • [59]Nunnally J, Bernstein L: Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, INC; 1994.
  • [60]Streiner DL: Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003, 80:99-103.
  • [61]Bornhöft G, Maxion-Bergemann S, Wolf U, Kienle GS, Michalsen A, Vollmar HC, Gilbertson S, Matthiessen PF: Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:56. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [62]Song M, Ratcliffe SJ, Tkacs NC, Riegel B: Self-care and health outcomes of diabetes mellitus. Clin Nurs Res 2012, 21:309-326.
  • [63]Amsberg S, Anderbro T, Wredling R, Lisspers J, Lins PE, Adamson U, Johansson UB: Experience from a behavioural medicine intervention among poorly controlled adult type 1 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009, 84:76-83.
  • [64]Primožič S, Tavčar R, Avbelj M, Dernovšek MZ, Oblak MR: Specific cognitive abilities are associated with diabetes self-management behavior among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012, 95:48-54.
  • [65]Tan SL, Juliana S, Sakinah H: Dietary compliance and its association with glycemic control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetic outpatients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malays J Nutr 2011, 17:287-299.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:18次