Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: advice seeking behavior among primary health care physicians in Pakistan

Health Research Policy and Systems

Peter S Hill⁴  Anar Ulikpan⁴  Saima Hamid¹  Cameron D Willis³  Asmat U Malik² 

[1] Health Services Academy, Prime Minister's National Health Complex, Government of Pakistan, Park Road, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan;Integrated Health Services, House 1-B, Street 50, Sector F-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan;Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo ON, N2L 3G1, Canada;School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston Road, 4006 Herston, QLD, Australia

关键词: Tuberculosis;    Systems thinking;    Social network analysis;    Primary health care;    Pakistan;    Measles;    Health system;   

Others  :  1177332
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-12-43

 received in 2013-12-17, accepted in 2014-06-04,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Using measles and tuberculosis as case examples, with a systems thinking approach, this study examines the human advice-seeking behavior of primary health care (PHC) physicians in a rural district of Pakistan. This study analyzes the degree to which the existing PHC system supports their access to human advice, and explores in what ways this system might be strengthened to better meet provider needs.

Methods

The study was conducted in a rural district of Pakistan and, with a cross-sectional study design, it employed a range of research methods, namely extensive document review for mapping existing information systems, social network analysis of physicians’ advice-seeking practice, and key stakeholder interviews for an in-depth understanding of the experience of physicians. Illustrations were prepared for information flow mechanism, sociographs were generated for analyzing social networks, and content analysis of qualitative findings was carried out for in-depth interpretation of underlying meanings.

Results

The findings of this study reveal that non-availability of competent supervisory staff, a focus on improving performance indicators rather than clinical guidance, and a lack of a functional referral system have collectively created an environment in which PHC physicians have developed their own strategies to overcome these constraints. They are well aware of the human expertise available within and outside the district. However, their advice-seeking behavior was dependent upon existence of informal social interaction with the senior specialists. Despite the limitations of the system, the physicians proactively used their professional linkages to seek advice and also to refer patients to the referral center based on their experience and the facilities that they trusted.

Conclusions

The absence of functional referral systems, limited effective linkages between PHC and higher levels of care, and a focus on programmatic targets rather than clinical care have each contributed to the isolation of physicians and reactive information seeking behavior. The study findings underscore the need for a functional information system comprising context sensitive knowledge management and translation opportunities for physicians working in PHC centers. Such an information system needs to link people and resources in ways that transcend geography and discipline, and that builds on existing expertise, interpersonal relationships, and trust.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Malik et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: The World Health Report 2008: primary Health Care Now More Than Ever. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
• [2]González-González AI, Dawes M, Sánchez-Mateos J, Riesgo-Fuertes R, Escortell-Mayor E, Sanz-Cuesta T, Hernández-Fernández T: Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians. Ann Fam Med 2007, 5(4):345-352.
• [3]Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR: Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985, 103(4):596-599.
• [4]Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA: Physicians’ information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med 1991, 114(7):576-581.
• [5]Davies K: The information-seeking behavior of doctors: a review of the evidence. Health Informat Libr J 2007, 24(2):78-94.
• [6]Green ML, Ciampi MA, Ellis PJ: Residents’ medical information needs in clinic: are they being met? Am J Med 2000, 109(3):218-223.
• [7]Kim G, Bartlett E, Lehmann H: Information resource preferences by general pediatricians in office settings: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005, 5(1):34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Huth EJ: “In the Balance”: weighing the evidence. Ann Intern Med 1994, 120(10):889.
• [9]Smith R: What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ 1996, 313(7064):1062-1068.
• [10]Cook D, Sorensen K, Wilkinson J, Berger R: Barriers and decisions when answering clinical questions at the point of care: a grounded theory study. JAMA Internal Med 2013, 173(21):1962-1969.
• [11]Bennett NL, Casebeer LL, Zheng S, Kristofco R: Information-seeking behaviors and reflective practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26(2):120-127.
• [12]World Health Organization: Everybody Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes. WHO’s Framework for Action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
• [13]Savigny D, Adam T: Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization; 2009.
• [14]Woulfe J, Oliver TR, Zahner SJ, Siemering KQ: Multisector partnerships in population health improvement. Prev Chronic Dis 2010, 7(6):A119.
• [15]Gkeredakis E, Swan J, Powell J, Nicolini D, Scarbrough H, Roginski C, Taylor-Phillips S, Clarke A: Mind the gap: understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. J Health Organ Manag 2011, 25(3):298-314.
• [16]Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001, 323(7313):625-628.
• [17]Best A, Clark P, Leischow S, Trochim W: Greater than the Sum: Systems Thinking in Tobacco Control. Tobacco Control Monograph no. 18. Bethesda, MD: U.S: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2007.
• [18]Sterman JD: Learning from evidence in a complex world. Am J Publ Health 2006, 96(3):505-514.
• [19]Willis C, Best A, Riley B, Herbert C, Millar J, Howland D: Systems thinking for transformational change in health. Evid Pol J Res Debate Pract 2014, 10(1):113-126.
• [20]Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME: Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Informat Assoc: JAMIA 2005, 12(2):217-224.
• [21]System DHI: DHIS Monthly Reports: January to April 2013. Attock: District Health Department; 2013.
• [22]Blanchet K, James P: How to do (or not to do) … a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Pol Plan 2012, 27(5):438-446.
• [23]Blanchet K, James P: The role of social networks in the governance of health systems: the case of eye care systems in Ghana. Health Pol Plan 2013, 28(2):143-156.
• [24]Hawe P, Webster C, Shiell A: A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58:971-975.
• [25]Knoke D, Yang S: Data Collection. Social Network Analysis. 2nd edition. California: Sage Publications; 2008:15-45.
• [26]NTC Program: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis in Pakistan. Islamabad: National Tuberculosis Control Program; 2012.
• [27]NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement: Quality & Service Improvement Tools. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2006.
• [28]Dorsch JL: Information needs of rural health professionals: a review of the literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000, 88(4):346-354.
• [29]Joint Learning Initiative: Human Resources for Health: Overcoming the Crisis. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2004.
• [30]Stange KC: Power to advocate for health. Ann Fam Med 2010, 8(2):100-107.