期刊论文详细信息
Genetics Selection Evolution
Expression of common fragile sites in two Ceboidea species: Saimiri boliviensis and Alouatta caraya (Primates: Platyrrhini)
Marta Mudry2  María Gorostiaga2  Ariela Fundia1 
[1] Department of Genetics, Hematology Research Institute, "Mariano R. Castex", National Academy of Medicine, Pacheco de Melo 3081, C.P. 1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina;Department of Biology (GIBE), FCEyN, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词: evolution;    heterochromatin;    chromosomal rearrangements;    fragile sites;    Ceboidea;   
Others  :  1094841
DOI  :  10.1186/1297-9686-32-1-87
 received in 1998-09-07, accepted in 1999-11-22,  发布年份 2000
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Fragile sites are points of preferential breakage that may be involved in chromosome rearrangements. Induction of common fragile sites (c-fra) and spontaneous breakage were analyzed in two New World Monkeys species: Saimiri boliviensis (SBO) and Alouatta caraya (ACA). Spontaneous chromosome aberrations were analyzed on untreated lymphocyte cultures with Brögger's formula (1977). SBO presented a low level of spontaneous breakage, while higher frequencies were detected in ACA in which bands 1q23; 2q13 and 11q19 were significantly affected (p < 0.01). The populational distribution of c-fra was analyzed by the Chi2 test in FUdR plus caffeine treated cultures. A total of 21 c-fra was identified in SBO and 24 in ACA. Fragile sites A1q33, B1p21, B4p14, C3q23 and C5q22 were identified in all analyzed SBO specimens. The most frequent c-fra identified in ACA specimens were 1q23, 1q31, 1q33, 2q22, 8q14, 12q31, 13q22, 14q15 and Xq22. Fragile sites A1q31, A1q33, B1q14, B3q13, B4q21 and Xq22 identified in SBO and 1q31, 1q33, 2q22, 4q21, 6q13, 13q22 and Xq22 from ACA were the most conserved sites. A low coincidence between the location of c-fra and that of heterochromatin and breakpoints involved in euchromatic rearrangements known for these genera, was established.

【 授权许可】

   
2000 INRA, EDP Sciences

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150130175838262.pdf 304KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:8次