Testing the performance of the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument in cardiac patients

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

John A Spertus¹  John House²  C Keith Haddock¹  James O'Keefe²  Walker S Poston¹  Mark Conard¹  Joseph Vaglio² 

[1] University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA;Mid America Heart Institute at St Lukes Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA

关键词: validity;    reliability;    ischemic heart disease;    ENRICHD;    ESSI;    social support;   

Others  :  1216965
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-2-24

 received in 2004-03-09, accepted in 2004-05-13,  发布年份 2004

【 摘 要 】

Background

Previous investigations suggest an important role of social support in the outcomes of patients treated for ischemic heart disease. The ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) is a 7-item self-report survey that assesses social support. Validity and reliability of the ESSI, however, has not been formally tested in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The ESSI, along with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), was sequentially administered to a cohort of 271 patients undergoing PCI. The test-retest reliability was examined with an intra-class correlation coefficient by comparing scores among 174 patients who completed both instruments 5 and 6 months after their procedure. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha at the time of patients' baseline procedure. The concurrent validity of the ESSI was assessed by comparing scores between depressed (MHI-5 score < 44) vs. non-depressed patients. The correlation between the ESSI and the SF-36 Social Functioning sub-scale, an accepted measure of social functioning, was also examined.

Results

Test-retest reliability showed no significant differences in mean scores among ESSI questionnaires administered 1 month apart (27.8+/-1.4 vs 27.8+/-1.5, p = 0.98). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.94 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. Mean ESSI scores were significantly lower among depressed vs. non-depressed patients (24.6+/-1.7 vs 27+/-1.4, p < 0.018) and a positive albeit modest correlation with social functioning was seen (r = 0.19, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The ESSI appears to be a valid and reliable measure of social support in patients undergoing treatment for coronary artery disease. It may prove to be a valuable method of controlling for patient variability in outcomes studies where the outcomes are related to patients' social support.

【 授权许可】

   
2004 Vaglio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sarason I., Levine, H., Basham, R., & Sarason, B.: Assessing Social Support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44:127-139.
• [2]Ahern DK, Gorkin L, Anderson JL, Tierney C, Hallstrom A, Ewart C, Capone RJ, Schron E, Kornfeld D, Herd JA, et al.: Biobehavioral variables and mortality or cardiac arrest in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS). Am J Cardiol 1990, 66:59-62.
• [3]Gorkin L, Schron EB, Brooks MM, Wiklund I, Kellen J, Verter J, Schoenberger JA, Pawitan Y, Morris M, Shumaker S: Psychosocial predictors of mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1 (CAST-1). Am J Cardiol 1993, 71:263-267.
• [4]Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI: Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1992, 117:1003-1009.
• [5]Williams RB, Barefoot JC, Califf RM, Haney TL, Saunders WB, Pryor DB, Hlatky MA, Siegler IC, Mark DB: Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. Jama 1992, 267:520-524.
• [6][No authors listed] Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD): study design and methods. The ENRICHD investigators Am Heart J 2000, 139:1-9.
• [7]Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study intervention: rationale and design Psychosom Med 2001, 63:747-755.
• [8]Blumenthal JA, Burg MM, Barefoot J, Williams RB, Haney T, Zimet G: Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med 1987, 49:331-340.
• [9]Beck A., Steer, R., & Garbin, M.: Psychometric properties of the depression inventory. Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 1981, 8:1003-1009.
• [10]Spertus JA, Bliven BD, Farner M, Gillen A, Hewitt T, Jones P, McCallister BD: Integrating baseline health status data collection into the process of care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001, 27:369-380.
• [11]McHorney CA, Ware J. E., Jr., Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993, 31:247-263.
• [12]Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware J. E., Jr., Barsky AJ, Weinstein MC: Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care 1991, 29:169-176.
• [13]Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL: Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991, 12:142S-158S.
• [14]Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, Spertus J: Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:569-575.
• [15]Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Fihn SD: Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1994, 74:1240-1244.
• [16]Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonell M, Fihn SD: Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 25:333-341.
• [17]Spertus JA, Jones P, McDonell M, Fan V, Fihn SD: Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation 2002, 106:43-49.
• [18]Goodger B, Byles J, Higganbotham N, Mishra G: Assessment of a short scale to measure social support among older people. Aust N Z J Public Health 1999, 23:260-265.
• [19]Streiner D. & Norman, G.: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 1991.
• [20]Langford CP, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP: Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs 1997, 25:95-100.