Moving in extreme environments: what’s extreme and who decides?

Extreme Physiology & Medicine

Michael J Tipton²  James David Cotter¹ 

[1] School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Division of Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand;Extreme Environments Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2ER, UK

关键词: Guidelines;    Adaptation;    Illness;    Injury;    Regulation;    Autonomy;    Stress;   

Others  :  802195
DOI  :  10.1186/2046-7648-3-11

 received in 2014-01-28, accepted in 2014-02-17,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Humans work, rest and play in immensely varied extreme environments. The term ‘extreme’ typically refers to insufficiency or excess of one or more stressors, such as thermal energy or gravity. Individuals’ behavioural and physiological capacity to endure and enjoy such environments varies immensely. Adverse effects of acute exposure to these environments are readily identifiable (e.g. heat stroke or bone fracture), whereas adverse effects of chronic exposure (e.g. stress fractures or osteoporosis) may be as important but much less discernable. Modern societies have increasingly sought to protect people from such stressors and, in that way, minimise their adverse effects. Regulations are thus established, and advice is provided on what is ‘acceptable’ exposure. Examples include work/rest cycles in the heat, hydration regimes, rates of ascent to and duration of stay at altitude and diving depth. While usually valuable and well intentioned, it is important to realise the breadth and importance of limitations associated with such guidelines. Regulations and advisories leave less room for self-determination, learning and perhaps adaptation. Regulations based on stress (e.g. work/rest cycles relative to WBGT) are more practical but less direct than those based on strain (e.g. core temperature), but even the latter can be substantively limited (e.g. by lack of criterion validation and allowance for behavioural regulation in the research on which they are based). Extreme Physiology & Medicine is publishing a series of reviews aimed at critically examining the issues involved with self- versus regulation-controlled human movement acutely and chronically in extreme environments. These papers, arising from a research symposium in 2013, are about the impact of people engaging in such environments and the effect of rules and guidelines on their safety, enjoyment, autonomy and productivity. The reviews will cover occupational heat stress, sporting heat stress, hydration, diving, extreme loading, chronic unloading and high altitude. Ramifications include factors such as health and safety, productivity, enjoyment and autonomy, acute and chronic protection and optimising adaptation.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Cotter and Tipton; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Byrne C, Lee JK, Chew SA, Lim CL, Tan EY: Continuous thermoregulatory responses to mass-participation distance running in heat. Med Sci Sports Exer 2007, 38(5):803-810.
• [2]Armstrong LE, Epstein Y, Greenleaf JE, Hubbard RW, Roberts WO, Thompson PD: Heat and cold illnesses during distance running: ACSM position stand. Med Sci Sports Exer 1996, 28(12):i-x.
• [3]Noakes TD: Hydration in the marathon: using thirst to gauge safe fluid replacement. Sports Med 2007, 37(4–5):463-466.
• [4]Sawka MN, Burke LM, Eichner ER, Maughan RJ, Montain SJ, Stachenfeld NS: American college of sports medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med Sci Sports Exer 2007, 39(2):377-390.
• [5]Horowitz M, Kodesh E: Molecular signals that shape the integrative responses of the heat-acclimated phenotype. Med Sci Sports Exer 2010, 42(12):2164-2172.
• [6]Tinken TM, Thijssen DHJ, Black MA, Cable NT, Green DJ: Time course of change in vasodilator function and capacity in response to exercise training in humans. J Physiol 2008, 586(20):5003-5012.