A comparison of the wild food plant use knowledge of ethnic minorities in Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve, Yunnan, SW China

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Joachim Sauerborn¹  Gerhard Langenberger¹  Abdolbaset Ghorbani¹ 

[1] Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany

关键词: Foraging;    Cultural importance;    Biodiversity use;    Edible plants;   

Others  :  862942
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-8-17

 received in 2011-11-12, accepted in 2012-03-20,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Wild food plants (WFPs) contribute to the nutrition, economy and even cultural identity of people in many parts of the world. Different factors determine the preference and use of WFPs such as abundance, availability, cultural preference, economic conditions, shortage periods or unsecure food production systems. Understanding these factors and knowing the patterns of selection, use and cultural significance and value of wild food plants for local communities is helpful in setting priorities for conservation and/or domestication of these plants. Thus in this study knowledge of wild food plant use among four groups namely Dai, Lahu, Hani and Mountain Han in Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve ((NRWNNR), Xishuangbanna were documented and analyzed to find the similarity and difference among their plant use.

Methods

Data on wild food plant use was collected through freelisting and semi-structured interviews and participatory field collection and direct observation. Botanical plant sample specimens were collected, prepared, dried and identified.

Results

A total of 173 species and subspecies from 64 families and one species of lichen (Ramalina sp.) are used as WFP. There were differences on the saliency of wild food plant species among four ethnic groups. Consensus analysis revealed that knowledge of wild food plant use for each ethnic group differs from others with some variation in each group. Among informant attributes only age was related with the knowledge of wild food plant use, whereas no significant relationship was found between gender and age*gender and informants knowledge of wild food plant use.

Conclusion

Wild food plants are still used extensively by local people in the NRWNNR, some of them on a daily base. This diversity of wild food plants provide important source of nutrients for the local communities which much of their caloric intake comes from one or few crops. The results also show the role of ethnicity on the preference and use of wild food plants. There is a big potential for harvesting, participatory domestication and marketing of WFPs especially in the tourism sector in the area.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Ghorbani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Heywood VH: Ethnopharmacology, food production, nutrition and biodiversity conservation: Towards a sustainable future for indigenous peoples. J Ethnopharmacol 2011, 137(1):1-15.
• [2]Kallas J: Edible wild plants: Wild foods from dirt to plate. Gibbs Smith publication; 2010.
• [3]Cunningham A: Applied ethnobotany: People, wild plant use and conservation. Earthscan Publication; 2001.
• [4]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: The state of food insecurity in the world: addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. FAO, Rome; 2010.
• [5]Puri RK, Vogl CR: A Methods Manual for Ethnobiological Research and Cultural Domain Analysis: with analysis using ANTHROPAC. Canterbury. Department of Anthropology, University of Kent, UK; 2005.
• [6]Martin GJ: Ethnobotany – A Methods Manual. Chapman and Hall, London; 1995.
• [7]Cao M, Zou X, Warren M, Zhu H: Tropical forests of xishuangbanna, China. Biotropica 2006, 38(3):306-309.
• [8]Hua Z: The tropical flora of Southern Yunnan, china, and its biogeographic affinities. Ann Mo Bot Gard 2008, 95(4):661-680.
• [9]Xu Y, Tao G, Liu H, Yan K, Dao X: Wild vegetable resources and market survey in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Econ Bot 2004, 58(4):647-667.
• [10]Chen J, Su Y, Chen G, Wang W: Ethnobotanical studies on wild edible fruits in Southern Yunnan: folk names; nutritional value and uses. Econ Bot 1999, 53(1):2-14.
• [11]Zhang XP, Wu JL, Li Y, Liu F, Wang JQ: Investigation on species resources and utilization of wild vegetable in nabanhe watershed nature reserve, Xishuangbanna. J South Forestry Coll 2004, 24:21-24.
• [12]Liu F, Fan G, Tao G: Study on wild medicinal plant resources in nabanhe national nature reserve. Environmental Science Survey 2010, 29(4):21-24.
• [13]Yunnan Environmental Protection Bureau: Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve. Yunnan Science and Technology Press; 2006.
• [14]Huai H, Pei S: Plant used medicinally by folk healers of the Lahu people from the autonomous county of Jiping Miao, Yao, and Dai in Southwest Chain. Econ Bot 2004, 58:s265-s273.
• [15]Mitchell S, Yuan L: Ethnic Minority Issues in Yunnan. Yunnan Fine Arts Publishing House, Kunming; 2004.
• [16]Stepp JR: Advances in ethnobiological field methods. Field Methods 2005, 17(3):211-218.
• [17]Berlin L, Berlin B: Some field methods in medical ethnobiology. Field Methods 2005, 17(3):235-268.
• [18]Quinlan M: Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: examples from ethnobotany. Field Methods 2005, 17(3):219-234.
• [19]Borgatti SP: Cultural domain analysis. J Quant Anthropol 1993, 4(4):261-278.
• [20]Flora of China Editorial Committee: Flora of China. Science Press/Missouri Botanical Garden Press, ; 1994. to present
• [21]Li Y, Pei SJ, Xu ZF: List of plants in Xishuangbanna. Yunnan Nationality Press, Kunming; 1996.
• [22]Borgatti SP: ANTHROPAC 4.0 methods guide. Analytic Technologies 1996.
• [23]Sutrop U: List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods 2001, 3(13):263-276.
• [24]Bonet MÀ, Vallès J: Use of non-crop food vascular plants in Montseny biosphere reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Int J Food Sci Nutr 2002, 53(3):225-248.
• [25]Pardo-de-Santayana M, Tardío J, Blanco E, Carvalho AM, Lastra JJ, San Miguel E, Morales R: Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): A comparative study. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2007, 3:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Pieroni A, Nebel S, Quave C, Münz H, Heinrich M: Ethnopharmacology of Liakra: traditional weedy vegetables of the arbëreshë of the vulture area in southern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 2002, 81(2):165-185.
• [27]Tardiío J, Pardo-De-Santayana M, Morales R: Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Bot J Linnaean Soc 2006, 152(1):27-71.
• [28]Termote C, Van Damme P, Djailo BD: Eating from the wild: Turumbu, Mbole and Bali traditional knowledge on non-cultivated edible plants, district Tshopo, DRCongo. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2011, 58(4):585-618.
• [29]Turner NJ, Luczaj LJ, Migliorini P, Pieroni A, Dreon AL, Sacchetti LE, Paoletti MG: Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2011, 30(1–2):198-225.
• [30]Mengistu F, Hager H: Wild edible fruit species cultural domain, informant species competence and preference in three districts of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl 2008, 6:487-502.
• [31]Watkins TY: The prevalence of wild food knowledge among nomadic Turkana of northern Kenya. J Ethnobiol 2010, 30(1):137-152.