Power distance and mentor-protégé relationship quality as moderators of the relationship between informal mentoring and burnout: evidence from China

International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Qiuyue Wang²  Xiaoyan Li³  Haiwan Wang²  Zhuo Han¹  Jing Qian² 

[1] School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, No. 19 Xinjiekou Outer Street, Beijing 100875C, China;Business School, Beijing Normal University, No. 19 Xinjiekou Outer Street, Beijing 100875, China;School of Business, Jiangxi Normal University, No. 99 Ziyang Street, Nanchang 100875, China

关键词: Mentor-protégé relationship quality;    Power distance;    Mentoring;    Burnout;   

Others  :  1135892
DOI  :  10.1186/1752-4458-8-51

 received in 2014-11-13, accepted in 2014-12-07,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The topic of how to prevent and reduce burnout has drawn great attention from researchers and practitioners in recent years. However, we know little about how mentoring as a form of social support exerts influence on employee burnout.

Aim

This study aims to examine the contingency side of the mentoring-burnout relationship by addressing the exploratory question of whether individual differences in power distance and relationship quality play important roles in mentoring effectiveness in terms of reducing a protégé’s burnout level.

Methods

A total of 210 employees from a technology communications company completed the survey questionnaire.

Results

(1) A protégés’ power distance moderates the negative relationship between mentoring and burnout in such a way that the relationship is stronger for protégés who are lower rather than higher in power distance; (2) mentor-protégé relationship quality moderates the negative relationship between mentoring and burnout in such a way that the relationship is stronger when the relationship quality is higher rather than lower.

Conclusions

In sum, our results highlight the importance of studying the contingency side of mentoring effects on protégé burnout. Our findings suggest that the individuals’ different cultural values of power distance and mentor-protégé relationship quality are the boundary conditions for the mentoring-burnout relationship. We therefore suggest that research on mentoring-burnout will be advanced by considering the role of the moderating process.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Qian et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Halbesleben JRB: Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. J Appl Psychol 2006, 91:1134-1145.
• [2]Maslach C: Burnout: the cost of caring. englewood cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1982.
• [3]Halbesleben JRB, Buckley MR: Burnout in organizational life. J Manag 2004, 30:859-879.
• [4]De Hoogh AHB, Den Hartog DN: Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordiantes’ optimism: a multi-method study. Leadersh Q 2008, 19(Suppl 3):297-311.
• [5]Cordes CL, Dougherty TW: A review and intergration of research on job burnout. Acad Manag Rev 1993, 18:621-656.
• [6]Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP: Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001, 52:397-422.
• [7]Kram KE: Mentoring at work. Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1985.
• [8]Linnehan F: A longitudinal study of work-based, adult–youth mentoring. J Vocat Behav 2003, 63:40-54.
• [9]Ragins BR, Cotton JL, Miller JS: Marginal mentoring: the effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Acad Manag J 1995, 43:1177-1194.
• [10]House JS: Work, stress, and social support, Reading. MA: Addison–Wesley; 1981.
• [11]Thomas CH, Lankau MJ: Preventing burnout: the effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Hum Resour Manag 2009, 48(Suppl 3):417-432.
• [12]Eby LT, Butts MM, Durley J, Ragins RR: Are bad experiences stronger than good ones in mentoring relationships? Evidence from the protégé and mentor perspective. J Vocat Behav 2010, 77:81-92.
• [13]Byrne ZS, Dik BJ, Chiaburu DS: Alternatives to traditional mentoring in fostering career success. J Vacat Behav 2008, 72:429.
• [14]Gentry WA, Weber TJ, Sadri G: Examining career-related mentoring and managerial performance across cultures: a multilevel analysis. J Vocat Behav 2008, 72(Suppl 2):241.
• [15]Hofstede G: Culture and organizations. New York: McGraw Hill; 1991.
• [16]Young AM, Perrewé PL: What did you expect? An examination of career-related support among mentors and protégés. J Manag 2000, 26:611-632.
• [17]Peng MW, Tan J, Tong TW: Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. J Manag Stud 2004, 41:1105-1129.
• [18]Wang D, Tsui AS, Zhang Y, Li M: Employment relationships and firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy. J Organ Behav 2003, 24(5):511-535.
• [19]Behling O, Law KS: Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
• [20]Fagenson EA: Mentoring—Who needs it? A comparison of protégés and non-protégés needs for power, achievement, affiliation and autonomy. J Vocat Behav 1992, 41:48-60.
• [21]Noe RA: An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Pers Psychol 1988, 41:457-479.
• [22]Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP: Maslach burnout Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
• [23]Schutte N, Toppinen S, Kalimo R, Schaufeli W: The factorial validity of the maslach burnout inventory–general survey (MBI-GS) across occupational groups and nations. J Occup Organ Psychol 2000, 73:53-66.
• [24]Taris TW, Schreurs PJG, Schaufeli WB: Constraint validity of the maslach burnout inventory—general survey: a two-sample examination of its factor structure and correlates. Work Stress 1999, 13:223-237.
• [25]Dorfman PW, Howell JP: Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In Advances in international comparative management. Volume 3. Edited by Farmer RN, McGoun EG. London: JAI Press; 1988::127-150.
• [26]Allen TD, Eby LT: Relationship effectiveness for mentors: factors associated with learning and quality. J Manag 2003, 29:469-486.
• [27]Hunt DM, Michael C: Mentorship: a career and development tool. Acad Manag Rev 1983, 8:475-485.
• [28]Kram KE: Phases of the mentoring relationship. Acad Manag J 1983, 26:608-625.
• [29]Noe RA: Women and mentoring: a review and research agenda. Acad Manag Rev 1988, 13:65-78.
• [30]Ragins BR: Barriers to mentoring: the female manager's dilemma. Hum Relat 1989, 42:1-22.
• [31]Whitely W, Dougherty TW, Dreher GF: Correlates of career-oriented mentoring for early career managers and professionals. J Organ Behav 1992, 13:141-154.
• [32]Allen TD: Mentoring others: a dispositional and motivational approach. J Vocat Behav 2003, 62:134-154.
• [33]Eby LT, Durley JR, Evans SC, Ragins BR: The relationship between short-term mentoring benefit and long-term mentor outcomes. J Vocat Behav 2006, 69:424-444.
• [34]Hayes AF, Matthes J: Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behav Res Methods 2009, 41:924-936.
• [35]Aryee S, Chen ZX, Sun L, Debrah Y: Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision in Chinese setting. J Appl Psychol 2007, 92:191-201.
• [36]Bagozzi R, Heatherton T: A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to self-esteem. Struct Equ Model 1994, 1:35-67.
• [37]Hui C, Lee C, Rousseau DM: Employment relationship in China: do workers relate to the organization or the people? Organ Sci 2004, 15:232-240.
• [38]Wang H, Law KS, Hackett RD, Wang DX, Chen ZX: Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organization citizenship behavior. Acad Manag J 2005, 48:420-432.
• [39]Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF: Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 2007, 42:185-227.
• [40]Allen TD, Eby LT, O’Brien KE, Lentz E: The state of mentoring research: a qualitative review of current research methods and future implications. J Vocat Behav 2008, 73:343-357.
• [41]Aryee S, Chay YW: An examination of the impact of career-oriented mentoring on work commitment attitudes and career satisfaction among professionals and managerial employees. Br J Manag 1994, 5:241-249.
• [42]Aryee S, Wyatt T, Stone R: Early career outcomes of graduate employees: the effect of mentoring and ingratiation. J Manag Stud 1996, 33:95-118.
• [43]Tsui A: Contributing to global management knowledge: a case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pac J Manag 2004, 12(5):11-28.
• [44]Fahr DB, Hackett RD, Liang J: Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Acad Manag J 2007, 50:715-729.
• [45]Ralston DA, Egri CP, Steward S, Terpstra RH, Kaicheng Y: Doing business in the 21st century with the new generation of Chinese managers: a study of generation shifts in wor values in China. J Int Bus Stud 1999, 30:415-427.
• [46]Kirkman BL, Chen G, Fahr JL, Lowe KB: Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Acad Manag J 2009, 52:744-764.
• [47]Rotundo M, Xie JL: Understanding the domain of counterproductive work behaviors in China. Int J of Hum Resour Manag 2008, 19:856-677.
• [48]Xie JL, Schaubroeck J, Lam S: Theories of job stress and the role of traditional values: A longitudinal study in China. J Appl Psychol 2008, 93:831-844.
• [49]Eby LT, Lockwood A: Protégés and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: a qualitative investigation. J Vocat Behav 2005, 67:441-458.
• [50]Young AM, Perrewé PL: The exchange relationship between mentors and protégés: the development of a framework. Hum Resour Manag Rev 2000, 10:177-209.
• [51]Allen TD, McManus SE, Russell JEA: Newcomer socialization and stress: formal peer relationships as a source of support. J Vocat Behav 1999, 54:453-470.
• [52]Williams M: Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: a threat regulation model of trust and cooperation across boundaries. Acad Manag Rev 2007, 32:595-621.
• [53]Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel SC: When and how diversity benefits teams: the importance of team members' need for cognition. Acad Manag J 2009, 52:581-598.
• [54]Pierce JL, Gardner DG, Dunham RB, Cummings LL: Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition–employee response relationships. Acad Manag J 1993, 36:271-288.
• [55]Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Kolodinsky RW, Ilochwarter WA, Kachmar CJ, Douglas C: Development and validation of the political skill inventory. J Manag 2005, 31(1):126-152.
• [56]Ferris GR, Anthony WP, Kolodinsky R, Gilmore DC, Harvey MG: Development of political skill. In Research in Management Education and Development, Rethinking Management Education for the 21st Century. Volume 3. Edited by Wankel C, DeFillippi R, Greenwich CT. Information Age Publishing; 2002::3-25.
• [57]Ahearn KK, Ferris GR, Hochwarter WA, Douglas C, Ammeter AP: Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management 2004, 30:309-327.
• [58]Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Gavin MB, Perrewé PL, Hall AT, Frink DD: Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability-job tension effects on job performance ratings: a longitudinal investigation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2007, 102:226-239.