Global health impacts of policies: lessons from the UK

Globalization and Health

Nicola F Watt²  Dena Ettehad¹  Sidney Wong⁴  Modi K Mwatsama³ 

[1] King’s College London, School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK;European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK;UK Health Forum, London, UK;NHS, Public Health Specialist, London, UK

关键词: Development;    Policy coherence;    Impact assessment;    Global health;   

Others  :  824789
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-8603-10-13

 received in 2013-08-12, accepted in 2014-02-09,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The UK government committed to undertaking impact assessments of its policies on the health of populations in low and middle-income countries in its cross-government strategy “Health is Global”. To facilitate this process, the Department of Health, in collaboration with the National Heart Forum, initiated a project to pilot the use of a global health impact assessment guidance framework and toolkit for policy-makers. This paper aims to stimulate debate about the desirability and feasibility of global health impact assessments by describing and drawing lessons from the first stage of the project.

Discussion

Despite the attraction of being able to assess and address potential global health impacts of policies, there is a dearth of existing information and experience. A literature review was followed by discussions with policy-makers and an online survey about potential barriers, preferred support mechanisms and potential policies on which to pilot the toolkit. Although policy-makers were willing to engage in hypothetical discussions about the methodology, difficulties in identifying potential pilots suggest a wider problem in encouraging take up without legislative imperatives. This is reinforced by the findings of the survey that barriers to uptake included lack of time, resources and expertise. We identified three lessons for future efforts to mainstream global health impact assessments: 1) Identify a lead government department and champion – to some extent, this role was fulfilled by the Department of Health, however, it lacked a high-level cross-government mechanism to support implementation. 2) Ensure adequate resources and consider embedding the goals and principles of global health impact assessments into existing processes to maximise those resources. 3) Develop an effective delivery mechanism involving both state actors, and non-state actors who can ensure a “voice” for constituencies who are affected by government policies and also provide the “demand” for the assessments.

Summary

This paper uses the initial stages of a study on global health impact assessments to pose the wider question of incentives for policy-makers to improve global health. It highlights three lessons for successful development and implementation of global health impact assessments in relation to stewardship, resources, and delivery mechanisms.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Mwatsama et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Krieger GR, Utzinger J, Winkler MS, Divall MJ, Phillips SD, Balge MZ, Singer BH: New international consensus on health impact assessment - Authors' reply. Lancet 2010, 376(9751):1465.
• [2]UN special rapporteur on the right to health [internet] 2011. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Health/Pages/SRRightHealthIndex.aspx webcite
• [3]MacNaughton G, Hunt P: Health impact assessment: the contribution of the right to the highest attainable standard of health. Public Health 2009, 123(4):302.
• [4]O’Keefe E, Scott-Samuel A: Health impact assessment as an accountability mechanism for the International Monetary Fund: the case of Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Health Serv 2010, 40(2):339-345. PubMed PMID: ISI:000277258100015. English
• [5]Vohra S, Cave B, Viliani F, Harris-Roxas BF, Bhatia R: New international consensus on health impact assessment. Lancet 2010, 376(9751):1464-1465. PubMed PMID: ISI:000284248500024. English
• [6]Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
• [7]Povall SL, Haigh FA, Abrahams D, Scott-Samuel A: Health Equity Impact Assessment. Oxford: Health Promotion International; 2013. Feb 28. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 23449601. English.
• [8]CONCORD - The European NGO confederation for relief and development: Spotlight on EU Policy Coherence for Development. Brussels: CONCORD The European NGO confederation for relief and development; 2011.
• [9]European Commission EuropeAid: Policy Coherence for Development. Brussels: European Commission; 2014. [cited 2014 28/01/2014]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/what/development-policies/policy-coherence/index_en.htm webcite
• [10]European Commission: Sustainability impact assessments [11 October 2012]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/analysis/sustainability-impact-assessments/ webcite
• [11]United Nations System Task Team: Realizing the Future We Want for All. Report to the Secretary General. New York: United Nations; 2012.
• [12]Her Majesty’s Government: Health is Global: A UK Government Strategy 2008–13. London: HMG; 2008.
• [13]Her Majesty’s Government: Health is Global: An Outcomes Framework for Global Health 2011–15. London: HMG; 2011.
• [14]Department of Health: Health Impact Assessment Tools: Simple Tools for Recording the Results of the Health Impact Assessment. London: HMG; 2010.
• [15]Department of Health: Putting Health in the Policy Picture: Review of how Health Impact Assessment is Carried out by Government Departments. London; 2010.
• [16]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
• [17]Monastersky R: Climate crunch: a burden beyond bearing. Nature 2009, 458:1091-1094.
• [18]Her Majesty’s Government: Carbon Plan. London: Change DfEaC; 2011.
• [19]Friel S, Kjellstrom T, McGranahan G, Monge P, Roy J: Urban Health Inequity: The Added Stress of Climate Change. London: Global Research Network on Urban Health Equity, UCL; 2010.
• [20]Friel S, Marmot M, McMichael AJ, Kjellstrom T, Vagero D: Global health equity and climate stabilisation: a common agenda. Lancet 2008, 372:1677-1683.
• [21]Department of Energy and Climate Change: Statistical Release: 2011 UK Greenhouse gas Emissions, Final Figures. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change; 2013.
• [22]Friel S, Dangour AD, Garnett T, Lock K, Chalabi Z, Roberts I, Butler A, Butler CD, Waage J, McMichael AJ, Haines A: Health and climate change for public health. Benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet 2009, 374:2016-2025.
• [23]World Health Organization: Climate Change and Human Health. Risks and Responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
• [24]McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S: Climate change and human health: present and future risks. Lancet 2006, 367(9513):859-869. PubMed PMID: ISI:000236016500031. English
• [25]Shuman EK: Global climate change and infectious diseases. New Engl J Med 2010, 362(12):1061-1063. PubMed PMID: ISI:000275894600001. English
• [26]Tate JE, Chitambar S, Esposito DH, Sarkar R, Gladstone B, Ramani S, Raghava MV, Sowmyanarayanan TV, Gandhe S, Arora R, Parashar UD, Kang G: Disease and economic burden of rotavirus diarrhoea in India. Vaccine 2009, 27(5):F18-F24.
• [27]The World Bank Health Nutrition & Population: Malaria in Africa. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2014. [cited 2014 28 January]. Available from: http://web.worldbank.org/ webcite
• [28]Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K: Is HIA Effective? A synthesis of concepts, methodologies and results. In The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment. Edited by Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2007.
• [29]Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Elliott E, Golby A, van Herten L, Lavin T, Stricka M, Williams G: Implementing and institutionalising HIA in Europe. In The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment. Edited by Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2007:57-80.
• [30]Gagnon M, Labonte R: Understanding how and why health is integrated into foreign policy - a case study of health is global, a UK Government strategy 2008–2013. Glob Health 2013, 9(1):24. PubMed PMID: doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-24 BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Carmichael L, Barton H, Gray S, Lease H, Pilkington P: Integration of health into urban spatial planning through impact assessment: identifying governance and policy barriers and facilitators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2012, 32:187-194.
• [32]Dora C, Racioppi F: Health impact assessment as part of strategic environmental assessment: moving the European policy framework towards a greater integration of health consideration in the development of policies, plans and programs. Epidemiology 2002, 13:S130.
• [33]Posas PJ: The UK’s draft guidance for health in SEA in light of HIA community priorities and the UNECE SEA protocol. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2011, 31(3):320-327.
• [34]Wright J, Parry J, Scully E: Institutionalizing policy-level health impact assessment in Europe: is coupling health impact assessment with strategic environmental assessment the next step forward? Bull World Health Organ 2005, 83:472-477.
• [35]Oxfam: The Great EU Sugar Scam: How Europe’s Sugar Regime is Devastating Livelihoods in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxfam; 2002.
• [36]Johnson B: Brussels is slowly beeting the life out of our sugar industry. London: The Telegraph; 2012. 20 February