Health equity in an unequal country: the use of medical services in Chile

International Journal for Equity in Health

Felipe Vásquez¹  Guillermo Paraje² 

[1] Department of Economics, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile;Business School, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile

关键词: Household surveys;    Chile;    Healthcare use;    Inequality;    Equity;   

Others  :  825996
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-11-81

 received in 2012-04-25, accepted in 2012-12-06,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

A recent health reform was implemented in Chile (the AUGE reform) with the objective of reducing the socioeconomic gaps to access healthcare. This reform did not seek to eliminate the private insurance system, which coexists with the public one, but to ensure minimum conditions of access to the entire population, at a reasonable cost and with a quality guarantee, to cover an important group of health conditions. This paper’s main objective is to enquire what has happened with the use of several healthcare services after the reform was fully implemented.

Methods

Concentration and Horizontal Inequity indices were estimated for the use of general practitioners, specialists, emergency room visits, laboratory and x-ray exams and hospitalization days. The change in such indices (pre and post-reform) was decomposed, following Zhong (2010). A “mean effect” (how these indices would change if the differential use in healthcare services were evenly distributed) and a “distribution effect” (how these indices would change with no change in average use) were obtained.

Results

Changes in concentration indices were mainly due to mean effects for all cases, except for specialists (where “distribution effect” prevailed) and hospitalization days (where none of these effects prevailed over others). This implies that by providing more services across socioeconomic groups, less inequality in the use of services was achieved. On the other hand, changes in horizontal inequity indices were due to distribution effects in the case of GP, ER visits and hospitalization days; and due to mean effect in the case of x-rays. In the first three cases indices reduced their pro-poorness implying that after the reform relatively higher socioeconomic groups used these services more (in relation to their needs). In the case of x-rays, increased use was responsible for improving its horizontal inequity index.

Conclusions

The increase in the average use of healthcare services after the AUGE reform has not always led to improved equity in the use of such services in most services. This indicates that there are still barriers to the equitable use of healthcare services (e.g. insufficient medical human resources, financial barriers, capacity constraints, etc.) that have remained after the reform.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Paraje and Vasquez; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]The World Bank Database. http://data.worldbank.org webcite
• [2]WHO Health Data. http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/countries/en/ webcite
• [3]Departamento de Estadísticas e Información de Salud Database. http://deis.minsal.cl/deis/Grafico_Morta_70_04 versi%C3%B3n 4 (2)_archivos/Defunciones_Grandes_causas_tabla y graficos.htm webcite
• [4]Infante A, Paraje G: Reforma de Salud: Garantías Exigibles como Derecho Ciudadano. In Las Nuevas Políticas de Protección Social en Chile. Edited by Larrañaga O, Contreras D. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Uqbar Editores; 2010:77-118.
• [5]Bitran R, Escobar L, Gassibe P: After Chile’s health reform: increase in coverage and access, decline in hospitalization and death rates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29(12):2161-2170.
• [6]Zhong H: On decomposing the inequality and inequity change in health care utilization: change in means, or change in the distributions? Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2010, 10(4):369-386.
• [7]Estadísticas FONASA. http://www.fonasa.cl/wps/wcm/connect/Internet/SA-General/Informacion+Corporativa/Estadisticas+Institucionales/ webcite
• [8]Vega J: Enfermo de pobre. Rev. Univ 2001, 73:43-56.
• [9]Fundación para la Superación de la Pobreza: Garantías en Salud. In Umbrales Sociales para Chile 2009. Santiago de Chile: Fundación para la Superación de la Pobreza; 2010:127-167.
• [10]Lenz R: Proceso político de la reforma AUGE de salud en Chile: algunas lecciones para América Latina. Una Mirada desde la Economía Política. In Serie Estudios Socio Económicos. Santiago de Chile: CIEPLAN; 2007.
• [11]Vargas V, Poblete S: Health prioritization: the case of Chile. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008, 27(3):782-792.
• [12]Superintendencia de Salud: Garantías Explícitas en Salud (GES-AUGE). http://www.supersalud.gob.cl/documentacion/569/w3-propertyvalue-2976.html webcite
• [13]Urrutia SMT, Poupin BL, Concha PX, Viñales AD, Iglesias NC, Reyes IV: ¿Por qué las mujeres no se toman el Papanicolau?: Barreras percibidas por un grupo de mujeres ingresadas al Programa de Cáncer Cervicouterino AUGE. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2008, 73:98-103.
• [14]Missoni E, Solimano G: Towards Universal Health Coverage: The Chilean Experience. In World Health Report Background Paper. Geneva: The World Health Organization; 2010.
• [15]Altura Management: Listas de Espera Auge y No Auge en Servicios de Salud a nivel Nacional. http://www.alturamanagement.cl/Estudios/Listas_de_Espera2.doc webcite
• [16]González F: Implementación del plan AUGE en pacientes con IRC. Rev Med Chil 2003, 131:545-551.
• [17]Sandoval G: Espera no Auge: se requieren 4.172 cirugías mensuales para terminar lista en marzo 2013. 2011. [La Tercera] http://diario.latercera.com/2011/11/11/01/contenido/pais/31-89993-9-espera-no-auge-se-requieren-4172-cirugias-mensuales-para-terminar-lista-en-marzo.shtml webcite
• [18]FONASA: Lista de Espera No Auge. http://www.fonasa.cl/wps/wcm/connect/db387ca2-d11c-4295-b262-8ea17f91aac4/nomina_sin_2_ss.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&attachment=true&id=1314890251381 webcite
• [19]The World Health Organization: World Health Statistics 2011. Geneva: The World Health Organization; 2011.
• [20]Nazzal NC, Campos TP, Corbalán HR, Lanas ZF, Bartolucci JJ, Sanhueza CP, Cavada Ch G, Prieto DJC: Impacto del plan AUGE en el tratamiento de pacientes con infarto agudo al miocardio con supradesnivel ST, en hospitales chilenos. Rev Med Chil 2008, 136:1231-1239.
• [21]Concha DF, Pastén VN, Espinosa FV, López AF: Impacto de la Implementación del Plan AUGE en la detección antenatal de Cardiopatías Congéntias. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2008, 73:163-172.
• [22]GfK A: Estudio Opinión Usuarios del Sistema de Salud Conocimiento y Posicionamiento de la Superintendencia de Salud, GES-AUGE y otros aspectos de la Reforma. http://www.supersalud.gob.cl/documentacion/569/articles-6953_recurso_1.pdf webcite
• [23]Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E: On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 1991, 33(5):545-557.
• [24]Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E: Measuring and testing for inequity in the delivery of health care. J Hum Resour 2000, 35(4):716-733.
• [25]van Doorslaer E, Koolman X, Jones AM: Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Econ 2004, 13(7):629-647.
• [26]Grossman M: On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 1972, 80(2):223-255.
• [27]Jones AM: Applied health economics. Milton Park, Abingdon, OX; New York, NY: Routledge; 2007.
• [28]Hilbe J: Negative binomial regression. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
• [29]Deb P, Holmes AM: Estimates of use and costs of behavioural health care: a comparison of standard and finite mixture models. Health Econ 2000, 9(6):475-489.
• [30]Jimenez-Martin S, Lebeaga J, Martinez-Granado M: Latent class versus two part models in the demand for physician services across theEuropean Union. In Econometric analysis of health Data. Edited by Jones AM, O'Donnell O. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2002:101-116.
• [31]Cleland JG, Van Ginneken JK: Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: the search for pathways of influence. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27(12):1357-1368.
• [32]Armar-Klemesu M, Ruel MT, Maxwell DG, Levin CE, Morris SS: Poor maternal schooling is the main constraint to good child care practices in Accra. J Nutr 2000, 130(6):1597-1607.
• [33]Deaton A: The analysis of household surveys: a microeconometric approach to development policy. Baltimore, MD: Published for the World Bank by Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
• [34]Huber H: Decomposing the causes of inequalities in health care use: a micro-simulations approach. J Health Econ 2008, 27(6):1605-1613.
• [35]van Doorslaer E, Koolman X: Explaining the differences in income-related health inequalities across European countries. Health Econ 2004, 13(7):609-628.