Effect of empathy trait on attention to faces: an event-related potential (ERP) study

Journal of Physiological Anthropology

Shigeki Watanuki¹  Damee Choi² 

[1] Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan;Department of Kansei Science, Kyushu University, 4-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan

关键词: Face;    Attention;    Event-related potential;    Late positive potential;    Empathy;   

Others  :  861479
DOI  :  10.1186/1880-6805-33-4

 received in 2013-09-24, accepted in 2014-01-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Empathy is deeply linked with the ability to adapt to human social environments. The present study investigated the relationship between the empathy trait and attention elicited by discriminating facial expressions.

Methods

Event-related potentials were measured while 32 participants (17 men and 15 women) discriminated facial expressions (happy or angry) and colors of flowers (yellow or purple) under an oddball paradigm. The empathy trait of participants was measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980).

Results

The empathy trait correlated positively with both the early portion (300 to 600 ms after stimulus onset) and late portion (600 to 800 ms after stimulus onset) of late positive potential (LPP) amplitude elicited by faces, but not with LPP elicited by flowers.

Conclusions

This result suggests that, compared to people with low empathy, people with high empathy pay more attention when discriminating facial expressions. The present study suggests that differences exist in methods of adapting to social environments between people with high and low empathy.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Choi and Watanuki; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Davis MH: Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995.
• [2]Smith A: Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. Psychol Rec 2006, 56:3-21.
• [3]Gazzaniga M: Human: The science behind what makes us unique. New York: HarperCollins Publisher; 2008.
• [4]Davis MH: A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 1980, 10:85.
• [5]Choi D, Watanuki S: Physiological recovery responses to socially pleasant images in stress. Jpn J Physiol Anthropol 2012, 17:167-173. in Japanese with English abstract
• [6]Hooker CI, Verosky SC, Germine LT, Knight RT, D’Esposito M: Mentalizing about emotion and its relationship to empathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2008, 3:204-217.
• [7]Jabbi M, Swart M, Keysers C: Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 34:1744-1753.
• [8]Krämer UM, Mohammadi B, Doñamayor N, Samii A: MünteTF: Emotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition–an fMRI-study. Brain Res 2010, 1311:110-120.
• [9]Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD: Empathy for pain involves the affective but not the sensory components of pain. Science 2004, 303:1157-1161.
• [10]Decety J, Jackson PL: The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004, 3:71-100.
• [11]Jackson PL, Brunet E, Meltzoff AN, Decety J: Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:752-761.
• [12]Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ: Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 2000, 52:95-111.
• [13]Lang P, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN: Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes. Edited by Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban MT, Hillsdale NJ. Erlbaum; 1997:97-136.
• [14]Olofsson JK, Polich J: Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biol Psychol 2007, 75:101-108.
• [15]Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradeley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ: Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:257-261.
• [16]Foti D, Hajcak G, Dien J: Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal‒spatial PCA. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:521-530.
• [17]Weinberg A, Hilgard J, Bartholow BD, Hajcak G: Emotional targets: evaluative categorization as a function of context and content. Int J Psychophysiol 2012, 84:149-154.
• [18]Weinberg A, Ferri J, Hajcak G: Interactions between Attention and Emotion: Insights from the Late Positive Potentia . In Handbook of Cognition and Emotion . Edited by Robinson MD, Watkins ER, Harmon-Jones E. New York: Guilford Press; 2013:35-54.
• [19]Bradley MM, Hamby S, Löw A, Lang PJ: Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:364-373.
• [20]Keil A, Bradley MM, Hauk O, Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Lang PJ: Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:641-649.
• [21]Kujawa A, Weinberg A, Hajcak G, Klein DN: Differentiating event‒related potential components sensitive to emotion in middle childhood: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Dev Psychobiol 2012, 55:539-550.
• [22]Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J: Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 2008, 77:247-265.
• [23]Weinberg A, Hajcak G: The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23:2994-3007.
• [24]Sakurai S: The relationship between empathy and helping behavior in college students. Bulletin of Nara University of Education 1998, 37:149-154. in Japanese with English abstract
• [25]Lundqvist D, Flykt A, Ohman A: The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces -KDEF(CD ROM). Stockholm: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, KarolinskaInstitutet; 2011.
• [26]Fishman I, Ng R, Bellugi U: Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts? Cogn Neurosci 2011, 2:67-73.
• [27]Towle VL, Bolaños J, Suarez D, Tan K, Grzeszczuk R, Levin DN, Cakmur R, Frank SA, Spire JP: The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 86:1-6.
• [28]Ally BA, McKeever JD, Waring JD, Budson AE: Preserved frontal memorial processing for pictures in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2044-2055.
• [29]Decety J, Lamm C: Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. Sci World J 2006, 6:1146-1163.
• [30]Singer T, Lamm C: The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1156:81-96.
• [31]Ferrari V, Codispoti M, Cardinale R, Bradley MM: Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:1753-1761.
• [32]Moratti S, Saugar C, Strange BA: Prefrontal-occipitoparietal coupling underlies late latency human neuronal responses to emotion. J Neurosci 2011, 31:17278-17286.
• [33]Moser JS, Hajcak G, Bukay E, Simons RF: Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:292-296.
• [34]Fan Y, Han S: Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: an event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:160-173.
• [35]Lamm C, Batson CD, Decety J: The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:42-58.