期刊论文详细信息
Genome Integrity
Gamma-H2AX foci in cells exposed to a mixed beam of X-rays and alpha particles
Andrzej Wojcik1  Joanna Czub2  Siamak Haghdoost3  Karl Brehwens3  Elina Staaf3 
[1] Department of Radiobiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland;Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland;Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Toxicology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, Stockholm, 106 91, Sweden
关键词: IRIF;    Foci;    Gamma-H2AX;    Mixed beam;    X-rays;    Alpha particles;    LET;    Ionizing radiation;   
Others  :  815261
DOI  :  10.1186/2041-9414-3-8
 received in 2012-08-06, accepted in 2012-10-30,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Little is known about the cellular effects of exposure to mixed beams of high and low linear energy transfer radiation. So far, the effects of combined exposures have mainly been assessed with clonogenic survival or cytogenetic methods, and the results are contradictory. The gamma-H2AX assay has up to now not been applied in this context, and it is a promising tool for investigating the early cellular response to mixed beam irradiation.

Purpose

To determine the dose response and repair kinetics of gamma-H2AX ionizing radiation-induced foci in VH10 human fibroblasts exposed to mixed beams of 241Am alpha particles and X-rays.

Results

VH10 human fibroblasts were irradiated with each radiation type individually or both in combination at 37°C. Foci were scored for repair kinetics 0.5, 1, 3 and 24 h after irradiation (one dose per irradiation type), and for dose response at the 1 h time point. The dose response effect of mixed beam was additive, and the relative biological effectiveness for alpha particles (as compared to X-rays) was of 0.76 ± 0.52 for the total number of foci, and 2.54 ± 1.11 for large foci. The repair kinetics for total number of foci in cells exposed to mixed beam irradiation was intermediate to that of cells exposed to alpha particles and X-rays. However, for mixed beam-irradiated cells the frequency and area of large foci were initially lower than predicted and increased during the first 3 hours of repair (while the predicted number and area did not).

Conclusions

The repair kinetics of large foci after mixed beam exposure was significantly different from predicted based on the effect of the single dose components. The formation of large foci was delayed and they did not reach their maximum area until 1 h after irradiation. We hypothesize that the presence of low X-ray-induced damage engages the DNA repair machinery leading to a delayed DNA damage response to the more complex DNA damage induced by alpha particles.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Staaf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140710063054316.pdf 1024KB PDF download
Figure 5. 51KB Image download
Figure 4. 99KB Image download
Figure 3. 80KB Image download
Figure 2. 77KB Image download
Figure 1. 34KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Giles NH Jr, Riley HP: Studies on the mechanism of the oxygen effect on the radiosensitivity of tradescantia chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1950, 36:337-344.
  • [2]Wardman P: Chemical radiosensitizers for use in radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007, 19:397-417.
  • [3]Bristow RG, Hill RP: Hypoxia and metabolism. hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8:180-192.
  • [4]Nias AH: Radiation and platinum drug interaction. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1985, 48:297-314.
  • [5]Skov KA: Modification of radiation response by metal complexes: A review with emphasis of nonplatinum studies. Radiat Res 1987, 112:217-242.
  • [6]Sorenson JR: Essential metalloelement metabolism and radiation protection and recovery. Radiat Res 1992, 132:19-29.
  • [7]Wang L, Yang W, Read P, Larner J, Sheng K: Tumor cell apoptosis induced by nanoparticle conjugate in combination with radiation therapy. Nanotechnology 2010, 21:475103.
  • [8]Difilippo F, Papiez L, Moskvin V, Peplow D, DesRosiers C, Johnson J, Timmerman R, Randall M, Lillie R: Contamination dose from photoneutron processes in bodily tissues during therapeutic radiation delivery. Med Phys 2003, 30:2849-2854.
  • [9]Kry SF, Salehpour M, Followill DS, Stovall M, Kuban DA, White RA, Rosen II: Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 62:1204-1216.
  • [10]Takam R, Bezak E, Marcu LG, Yeoh E: Out-of-field neutron and leakage photon exposures and the associated risk of second cancers in high-energy photon radiotherapy: Current status. Radiat Res 2011, 176:508-520.
  • [11]Forman JD, Yudelev M, Bolton S, Tekyi-Mensah S, Maughan R: Fast neutron irradiation for prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002, 21:131-135.
  • [12]Capala J, Stenstam BH, Skold K, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Giusti V, Persson C, Wallin E, Brun A, Franzen L, Carlsson J, Salford L, Ceberg C, Persson B, Pellettieri L, Henriksson R: Boron neutron capture therapy for glioblastoma multiforme: Clinical studies in sweden. J Neurooncol 2003, 62:135-144.
  • [13]Coderre JA, Morris GM: The radiation biology of boron neutron capture therapy. Radiat Res 1999, 151:1-18.
  • [14]Hendry JH, Simon SL, Wojcik A, Sohrabi M, Burkart W, Cardis E, Laurier D, Tirmarche M, Hayata I: Human exposure to high natural background radiation: What can it teach us about radiation risks? J Radiol Prot 2009, 29:A29-42.
  • [15]Simonsen LC, Wilson JW, Kim MH, Cucinotta FA: Radiation exposure for human mars exploration. Health Phys 2000, 79:515-525.
  • [16]Durante M, Cucinotta FA: Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8:465-472.
  • [17]Barendsen GW, Beusker TL, Vergroesen AJ, Budke L: Effects of different radiations on human cells in tissue culture. II. biological experiments. Radiat Res 1960, 13:841-849.
  • [18]Raju MR, Jett JH: RBE and OER variations of mixtures of plutonium alpha particles and X-rays for damage to human kidney cells (T-1). Radiat Res 1974, 60:473-481.
  • [19]Wuttke K, Muller WU, Streffer C: The sensitivity of the in vitro cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay in lymphocytes for different and combined radiation qualities. Strahlenther Onkol 1998, 174:262-268.
  • [20]Furusawa Y, Aoki M, Durante M: Simultaneous exposure of mammalian cells to heavy ions and X-rays. Adv Space Res 2002, 30:877-884.
  • [21]Phoenix B, Green S, Hill MA, Jones B, Mill A, Stevens DL: Do the various radiations present in BNCT act synergistically? cell survival experiments in mixed alpha-particle and gamma-ray fields. Appl Radiat Isot 2009, 67:S318-20.
  • [22]Railton R, Lawson RC, Porter D: Interaction of gamma-ray and neutron effects on the proliferative capacity of chinese hamster cells. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1975, 27:75-82.
  • [23]Bird RP, Zaider M, Rossi HH, Hall EJ, Marino SA, Rohrig N: The sequential irradiation of mammalian cells with X rays and charged particles of high LET. Radiat Res 1983, 93:444-452.
  • [24]Higgins PD, DeLuca PM Jr, Pearson DW, Gould MN: V79 survival following simultaneous or sequential irradiation by 15-MeV neutrons and 60Co photons. Radiat Res 1983, 95:45-56.
  • [25]Higgins PD, DeLuca PM Jr, Gould MN: Effect of pulsed dose in simultaneous and sequential irradiation of V-79 cells by 14.8-MeV neutrons and 60Co photons. Radiat Res 1984, 99:591-595.
  • [26]Brooks AL, Newton GJ, Shyr LJ, Seiler FA, Scott BR: The combined effects of alpha-particles and X-rays on cell killing and micronuclei induction in lung epithelial cells. Int J Radiat Biol 1990, 58:799-811.
  • [27]Zhou G, Bennett PV, Cutter NC, Sutherland BM: Proton-HZE-particle sequential dual-beam exposures increase anchorage-independent growth frequencies in primary human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 2006, 166:488-494.
  • [28]Bennett PV, Cutter NC, Sutherland BM: Split-dose exposures versus dual ion exposure in human cell neoplastic transformation. Radiat Environ Biophys 2007, 46:119-123.
  • [29]Hada M, Meador JA, Cucinotta FA, Gonda SR, Wu H: Chromosome aberrations induced by dual exposure of protons and iron ions. Radiat Environ Biophys 2007, 46:125-129.
  • [30]Rothkamm K, Lobrich M: Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:5057-5062.
  • [31]Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM: DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:5858-5868.
  • [32]Sedelnikova OA, Rogakou EP, Panyutin IG, Bonner WM: Quantitative detection of (125)IdU-induced DNA double-strand breaks with gamma-H2AX antibody. Radiat Res 2002, 158:486-492.
  • [33]Fernandez-Capetillo O, Lee A, Nussenzweig M, Nussenzweig A: H2AX: The histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:959-967.
  • [34]Goodhead DT, Thacker J, Cox R: Effects of radiations of different qualities on cells: Molecular mechanisms of damage and repair. Int J Radiat Biol 1993, 63:543-556.
  • [35]Pilch DR, Sedelnikova OA, Redon C, Celeste A, Nussenzweig A, Bonner WM: Characteristics of gamma-H2AX foci at DNA double-strand breaks sites. Biochem Cell Biol 2003, 81:123-129.
  • [36]Leatherbarrow EL, Harper JV, Cucinotta FA, O'Neill P: Induction and quantification of gamma-H2AX foci following low and high LET-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2006, 82:111-118.
  • [37]Karlsson KH, Stenerlow B: Focus formation of DNA repair proteins in normal and repair-deficient cells irradiated with high-LET ions. Radiat Res 2004, 161:517-527.
  • [38]Desai N, Davis E, O'Neill P, Durante M, Cucinotta FA, Wu H: Immunofluorescence detection of clustered gamma-H2AX foci induced by HZE-particle radiation. Radiat Res 2005, 164:518-522.
  • [39]Desai N, Durante M, Lin ZW, Cucinotta F, Wu H: High LET-induced H2AX phosphorylation around the bragg curve. Adv Space Res 2005, 35:236-242.
  • [40]Aten JA, Stap J, Krawczyk PM, van Oven CH, Hoebe RA, Essers J, Kanaar R: Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 2004, 303:92-95.
  • [41]Magee JL, Chatterjee A: Radiation chemistry of heavy-particle tracks. 1. general considerations. J Phys Chem 1980, 84:3529-3536.
  • [42]Neumaier T, Swenson J, Pham C, Polyzos A, Lo AT, Yang P, Dyball J, Asaithamby A, Chen DJ, Bissell MJ, Thalhammer S, Costes SV: Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose–response nonlinearity in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:443-448.
  • [43]Costes SV, Boissiere A, Ravani S, Romano R, Parvin B, Barcellos-Hoff MH: Imaging features that discriminate between foci induced by high- and low-LET radiation in human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 2006, 165:505-515.
  • [44]Bracalente C, Ibanez IL, Molinari B, Palmieri MA, Maglioco A, Policastro L, Kreiner AJ, Burlon A, Valda A, Davidson J, Davidson M, Vazquez M, Ozafran M, Duran H: Assessment of gamma-H2AX nuclear foci number and size in normal and repair-deficient cells irradiated with low and high linear energy transfer radiation. Int J Low Radiation 2010, 7:393-408.
  • [45]Staaf E, Brehwens K, Haghdoost S, Pachnerova Brabcova K, Czub J, Braziewicz J, Nievaart S, Wojcik A: Characterization of a setup for mixed beam exposures of cells to 241Am alpha particles and X-rays. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012, 151:570-579.
  • [46]Staaf E, Brehwens K, Haghdoost S, Pachnerova Brabcova K, Nievaart S, Czub J, Braziewicz J, Wojcik A: Micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed to mixed beams of X-rays and alpha particles. Radiat Environ Biophys 2012, 51:283-293.
  • [47]Hoglund H, Stenerlow B: Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in normal human skin fibroblasts after exposure to radiation of different linear energy transfer: Possible roles of track structure and chromatin organization. Radiat Res 2001, 155:818-825.
  • [48]Goodhead DT: Energy deposition stochastics and track structure: What about the target? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006, 122:3-15.
  • [49]Pinto M, Prise KM, Michael BD: Evidence for complexity at the nanometer scale of radiation-induced DNA DSBs as a determinant of rejoining kinetics. Radiat Res 2005, 164:73-85.
  • [50]Franken NA, Ten Cate R, Krawczyk PM, Stap J, Haveman J, Aten J, Barendsen GW: Comparison of RBE values of high- LET alpha-particles for the induction of DNA-DSBs, chromosome aberrations and cell reproductive death. Radiat Oncol 2011, 6:64. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [51]Du G, Drexler GA, Friedland W, Greubel C, Hable V, Krucken R, Kugler A, Tonelli L, Friedl AA, Dollinger G: Spatial dynamics of DNA damage response protein foci along the ion trajectory of high-LET particles. Radiat Res 2011, 176:706-715.
  • [52]Cucinotta FA, Pluth JM, Anderson JA, Harper JV, O'Neill P: Biochemical kinetics model of DSB repair and induction of gamma-H2AX foci by non-homologous end joining. Radiat Res 2008, 169:214-222.
  • [53]Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N: Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:1219-1228.
  • [54]Kuhne M, Riballo E, Rief N, Rothkamm K, Jeggo PA, Lobrich M: A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res 2004, 64:500-508.
  • [55]Riballo E, Kuhne M, Rief N, Doherty A, Smith GC, Recio MJ, Reis C, Dahm K, Fricke A, Krempler A, Parker AR, Jackson SP, Gennery A, Jeggo PA, Lobrich M: A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. Mol Cell 2004, 16:715-724.
  • [56]Antonelli F, Belli M, Cuttone G, Dini V, Esposito G, Simone G, Sorrentino E, Tabocchini MA: Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in human cells: Dephosphorylation of histone H2AX and its inhibition by calyculin A. Radiat Res 2005, 164:514-517.
  • [57]Hamada N, Schettino G, Kashino G, Vaid M, Suzuki K, Kodama S, Vojnovic B, Folkard M, Watanabe M, Michael BD, Prise KM: Histone H2AX phosphorylation in normal human cells irradiated with focused ultrasoft X rays: Evidence for chromatin movement during repair. Radiat Res 2006, 166:31-38.
  • [58]Suzuki M, Suzuki K, Kodama S, Watanabe M: Phosphorylated histone H2AX foci persist on rejoined mitotic chromosomes in normal human diploid cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2006, 165:269-276.
  • [59]Suzuki K, Okada H, Yamauchi M, Oka Y, Kodama S, Watanabe M: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phosphorylated ATM foci induced by low-dose ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2006, 165:499-504.
  • [60]Schmid TE, Dollinger G, Beisker W, Hable V, Greubel C, Auer S, Mittag A, Tarnok A, Friedl AA, Molls M, Roper B: Differences in the kinetics of gamma-H2AX fluorescence decay after exposure to low and high LET radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2010, 86:682-691.
  • [61]Jakob B, Splinter J, Conrad S, Voss KO, Zink D, Durante M, Lobrich M, Taucher-Scholz G: DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone H2AX phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:6489-6499.
  • [62]Robichova S, Slamenova D, Chalupa I, Sebova L: DNA lesions and cytogenetic changes induced by N-nitrosomorpholine in HepG2, V79 and VH10 cells: The protective effects of vitamins A. C and E Mutat Res 2004, 560:91-99.
  • [63]Edwards AA, Purrott RJ, Prosser JS, Lloyd DC: The induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by alpha-radiation. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1980, 38:83-91.
  • [64]Pachnerova Brabcova K, Ambrozova I, Spurny F: Spectrometry of linear energy transfer with track-etched detectors in carbon ion beams, MONO and SOBP. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011, 143:440-444.
  • [65]Thomas P, Tracy B, Ping T, Baweja A, Wickstrom M, Sidhu N, Hiebert L: Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of alpha radiation in cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells. Int J Radiat Biol 2007, 83:171-179.
  • [66]Markova E, Schultz N, Belyaev IY: Kinetics and dose–response of residual 53BP1/gamma-H2AX foci: Co-localization, relationship with DSB repair and clonogenic survival. Int J Radiat Biol 2007, 83:319-329.
  • [67]Costes SV, Chiolo I, Pluth JM, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Jakob B: Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization. Mutat Res 2010, 704:78-87.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:47次 浏览次数:78次