Healthier side dishes at restaurants: an analysis of children’s perspectives, menu content, and energy impacts

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Christina D Economos²  Kyle Washburn¹  Miriam E Nelson²  Peter R Dolan¹  Sarah Sliwa²  Franciel Dawes³  Stephanie Anzman-Frasca² 

[1] Child-Obesity-180, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA;Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA;Frances Stern Nutrition Center, Tufts Medical Center, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA

关键词: Childhood obesity;    Healthy eating;    Defaults;    Side dishes;    Vegetables;    Fruit;    Food away from home;    Children;    Restaurants;   

Others  :  1146378
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-11-81

 received in 2013-11-22, accepted in 2014-06-20,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Children consume restaurant-prepared foods at high rates, suggesting that interventions and policies targeting consumption of these foods have the potential to improve diet quality and attenuate excess energy intake. One approach to encouraging healthier dietary intake in restaurants is to offer fruits and vegetables (FV) as side dishes, as opposed to traditional, energy-dense accompaniments like French fries. The aims of the current study were to examine: children's views about healthier side dishes at restaurants; current side dish offerings on children's menus at leading restaurants; and potential energy reductions when substituting FV side dishes in place of French fries.

Methods

To investigate children’s attitudes, a survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of U.S. 8- to 18-year-olds (n = 1178). To examine current side dish offerings, children's menus from leading quick service (QSR; n = 10) and full service restaurant chains (FSR; n = 10) were analyzed. Energy reductions that could result from substituting commonly-offered FV side dishes for French fries were estimated using nutrition information corresponding to the children's menu items.

Results

Two-thirds of children reported that they would not feel negatively about receiving FV sides instead of French fries with kids' meals. Liking/taste was the most common reason that children gave to explain their attitudes about FV side dishes. Nearly all restaurants offered at least 1 FV side dish option, but at most restaurants (60% of QSR; 70% of FSR), FV sides were never served by default. Substituting FV side dishes for French fries yielded an average estimated energy reduction of at least 170 calories.

Conclusions

Results highlight some healthy trends in the restaurant context, including the majority of children reporting non-negative attitudes about FV side dishes and the consistent availability of FV side dish options at leading QSR and FSR. Yet the minority of restaurants offer these FV sides by default. Promoting creative, appealing FV side dishes can result in healthier, less energy-dense meals for children. Substituting or displacing energy-dense default side dishes with such FV dishes show promise as part of continued, comprehensive efforts to increase the healthfulness of meals consumed by children in restaurant settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Anzman-Frasca et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Poti JM, Popkin BM: Trends in energy intake among US children by eating location and food source, 1977–2006. J Am Diet Assoc 2011, 111(8):1156-1164.
• [2]Powell LM, Nguyen BT, Han E: Energy intake from restaurants: demographics and socioeconomics, 2003–2008. Am J Prev Med 2012, 43(5):498-504.
• [3]Batada A, Bruening M, Marchlewicz EH, Story M, Wootan MG: Poor nutrition on the menu: children’s meals at America’s top chain restaurants. Child Obes 2012, 8(3):251-254.
• [4]Powell LM, Nguyen BT: Fast-food and full-service restaurant consumption among children and adolescents effect on energy, beverage, and nutrient intake. JAMA Pediatr 2013, 167(1):14-20.
• [5]Hearst MO, Harnack LJ, Bauer KW, Earnest AA, French SA, Oakes MJ: Nutritional quality at eight U.S. fast-food chains: 14-Year trends. Am J Prev Med 2013, 44(6):589-594.
• [6]Serrano EL, Jedda VB: Comparison of fast-food and non-fast-food children's menu items. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009, 41(2):132-137.
• [7]Kirkpatrick SI, Reedy J, Kahle LL, Harris JL, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Krebs-Smith SM: Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor. Public Health Nutr 2013, 15:1-8.
• [8]Center for Science in the Public Interest: Kids' meals II: Obesity and poor nutrition on the menu. Available at: http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/cspi-kids-meals-2013.pdf webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013
• [9]United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Health and Human Services: Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010 7th Edition. Available at: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/dietaryguidelines2010.pdf webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013
• [10]Dixon HG, Scully ML, Wakefield MA, White VM, Crawford DA: The effects of television advertisements for junk food versus nutritious food on children's food attitudes and preferences. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65(7):1311-1323.
• [11]Coon KA, Tucker KL: Television and children's consumption patterns, A review of the literature. Minerva Pediatr 2002, 54(5):423-436.
• [12]Andreyeva T, Kelly IR, Harris JL: Exposure to food advertising on television: associations with children's fast food and soft drink consumption and obesity. Econ Hum Biol 2011, 9(3):221-233.
• [13]Nicklas TA, Goh ET, Goodell LS, Acuff DS, Reiher R, Buday R, Ottenbacher A: Impact of commercials on food preferences of low-income, minority preschoolers. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011, 43(1):35-41.
• [14]Story M, French S: Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004, 1(1):3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G, Caraher M: Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children: a retrospective summary. Appetite 2012, 62:209-215.
• [16]Gorn GJ, Goldberg M: Behavioral evidence of the effects of televised food messages on children. J Consum Res 1982, 9:200-205.
• [17]Harris JL, Bargh JA, Brownell KD: Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health Psychol 2009, 28(4):404-413.
• [18]Harris JL, Pomeranz JL, Lobstein T, Brownell KD: A crisis in the marketplace: how food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done. Annu Rev Publ Health 2009, 30:211-225.
• [19]Lobstein T, Dibb S: Evidence of a possible link between obesogenic food advertising and child overweight. Obes Rev 2005, 6(3):203-208.
• [20]Elbel B, Gyamfi J, Kersh R: Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: a natural experiment. Int J Obes 2011, 35(4):493-500.
• [21]Tandon PS, Zhou C, Chan NL, Lozano P, Couch SC, Glanz K, Krieger J, Saelens BE: The impact of menu labeling on fast-food purchases for children and parents. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41(4):434-438.
• [22]Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Impact of menu labeling on consumer behavior: A 2008–2012 update. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2013/rwjf406357 webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013
• [23]Tandon PS, Wright J, Zhou C, Rogers CB, Christakis DA: Nutrition menu labeling may lead to lower-calorie restaurant meal choices for children. Peds 2010, 125(2):244-248.
• [24]Downs JS, Loewenstein G, Wisdom J: Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. Am Econ Rev 2009, 99(2):159-164.
• [25]Park CW, Jun SY, MacInnis DJ: Choosing what I want versus rejecting what I do not want: An application of decision framing to product option choice decisions. J Marketing Res 2000, 37(2):187-202.
• [26]Johnson EJ, Bellman S, Lohse GL: Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. J Mar 2003, 67(2):62-75.
• [27]Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG: Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation 2004, 78(12):1713-1716.
• [28]Johnson EJ, Bellman S, Lohse GL: Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Market Lett 2002, 13(1):5-15.
• [29]Wootan MG: Children's meals in restaurants: Families need more help to make healthy choices. Child Obes 2012, 8(1):31-33.
• [30]McCluskey JJ, Mittelhammer RC, Asiseh F: From default to choice: Adding healthy options to kids’ menus. Am J Agr Econ 2012, 94(2):338-343.
• [31]Wansink B, Banks AS: Calorie reductions and within-meal calorie compensation in children’s meal combos. Obesity 2014, 22(3):630-632.
• [32]Bassett R, Chapman G, Beagan B: Autonomy and control: The co-construction of adolescent food choice. Appetite 2008, 50(2–3):325-332.
• [33]Birch LL: Preschool children's food preferences and consumption patterns. J Nutr Educ 1979, 11(4):189-192.
• [34]National Restaurant Association: Top 100 chains: U.S. sales. Available at: http://nrn.com/us-top-100/top-100-chains-us-sales webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013
• [35]United States Department of Agriculture: Food groups. Available at: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/food-groups/ webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013
• [36]Baranowski T, Domel S, Gould R, Baranowski J, Leonard S, Treiber F, Mullis R: Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among 4th and 5th grade students: Results from focus groups using reciprocal determinism. J Nutr Educ 1993, 25(3):114-120.
• [37]Kirby SD, Baranowski T, Reynolds KD, Taylor G, Binkley D: Children's fruit and vegetable intake: socioeconomic, adult-child, regional, and urban–rural influences. J Nutr Educ 1995, 27(5):261-271.
• [38]Drewnowski A: Taste preferences and food intake. Ann Rev Nutr 1997, 17(1):237-253.
• [39]Epstein LH, Salvy SJ, Carr KA, Dearing KK, Bickel WK: Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiol Behav 2010, 100(5):438-445.
• [40]Birch LL, Anzman SL: Learning to eat in an obesogenic environment: a developmental systems perspective on childhood obesity. Child Dev Perspect 2010, 4(2):138-143.
• [41]Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW: Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 2010, 140(10):1832-1838.
• [42]Urban LE, Dallal GE, Robinson LM, Ausman LM, Saltzman E, Roberts SB: The accuracy of stated energy contents of reduced-energy, commercially prepared foods. J Am Diet Assoc 2010, 110(1):116-123.
• [43]Rolls BJ: The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav 2009, 97(5):609-615.
• [44]Leahy KE, Birch LL, Rolls BJ: Reducing the energy density of multiple meals decreases the energy intake of preschool-age children. Am J Clin Nutr 2008, 88(6):1459-1468.
• [45]Wansink B, Chandon P: Can "low-fat" nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal Marketing Res 2006, 43(4):605-617.
• [46]Hudson Institute: Lower-calorie foods. It's just good business; 2013. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2013/rwjf404136 webcite. Accessed September 15, 2013