期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Preparation and characterization of poly (ethersulfone) nanofiltration membranes for amoxicillin removal from contaminated water
Ali Akbar Safekordi1  Mohammad Soltanieh1  Seyed mahmoud Mousavi2  Maryam Omidvar1 
[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
关键词: Separation;    Amoxicillin;    Surfactant;    Membrane;    Poly(ethersulfone);   
Others  :  810735
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-336X-12-18
 received in 2013-04-04, accepted in 2013-11-02,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Nowadays, antibiotics such as amoxicillin have been entered in water bodies. Nanofiltration has been proposed as an attractive technology for removal of antibiotics from aquatic environment instead of conventional wastewater treatment. In this paper, novel asymmetric flat sheet nanofiltration membranes were prepared via immersion precipitation technique and by using the poly(ethersulfone)/Brij®S100/Poly(vinylpirrolidone)/1-methyl-2-pyrolidone casting solutions. The effect of addition of Brij®S100 as a non-ionic surfactant additive as well as concentration of poly (ethersulfone) on morphology, wettability, pure water flux and rejection of amoxicillin were studied using the scanning electron microscopy, water contact angle apparatus and experimental set-up. The results indicated that the addition of Brij®S100 to the casting solutions resulted in the formation of membranes with higher hydrophilicity and relatively noticeable rejection of amoxicillin up to 99% in comparison with unmodified poly(ethersulfone) membrane. Contrary to amoxicillin rejection, pure water flux was decreased when higher poly(ethersulfone) concentration was employed.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Omidvar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709050832160.pdf 2558KB PDF download
Figure 8. 35KB Image download
Figure 7. 35KB Image download
Figure 6. 26KB Image download
Figure 5. 36KB Image download
Figure 4. 149KB Image download
Figure 3. 150KB Image download
Figure 2. 40KB Image download
Figure 1. 11KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Elmolla E, Chaudhuri M: Biodegradability improvement of antibiotics aqueous solution by fenton process. National postgraduate conference (NPC). Universiti Teknologi Petronas; 2009.
  • [2]Zazouli MA, Ulbrich M, Nasseri S, Susanto H: Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic organic matteron amoxicillin and cephalexin residuals rejection from water by nanofiltration. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2010, 7:15-24.
  • [3]Ghauch A, Tuqan A, Assi HA: Elimination of amoxicillin and ampicillin by micro scale and nano scale iron particles. Environ Pollut 2009, 157:1626-1635.
  • [4]Zhang W, He G, Gao P, Chen G: Development and characterization of composite nanofiltration membranes and their application in concentration of antibiotics. Sep Purif Technol 2003, 30:27-35.
  • [5]Koyuncu I, Arikana OA, Wiesner MR, Rice C: Removal of hormones and antibiotics by nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2008, 309:94-101.
  • [6]Zazouli MA, Susanto H, Nasseri S, Ulbricht M: Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration. Water Res 2009, 43:3270-3280.
  • [7]Shah AD, Huang CH, Kim JH: Mechanisms of antibiotic removal by nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2012, 389:234-244.
  • [8]Wang KY, Chung TS: The characterization of flat composite nanofiltration membranes and their applications in the separation of Cephalexin. J Membr Sci 2005, 247:37-50.
  • [9]Shahtalebi A, Sarrafzadeh MH, Montazer Rahmati MM: Application of nanofiltration membrane in the separation of amoxicillin from pharmaceutical waste water. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2011, 8:109-116.
  • [10]Sun SP, Hatton TA, Chan SU, Shung Chung T: Novel thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with double repulsion for effective removal of emerging organic matters from water. J Membr Sci 2012, 401–402:152-162.
  • [11]Saha NK, Balakrishnan M, Ulbricht M: Fouling control in sugarcane juice ultrafiltration with surface modified polysulfone and polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination 2009, 249:1124-1131.
  • [12]Amirilargani M, Saljoughi E, Mohammadi T: Improvement of permeation performance of polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membranes via addition of tween-20. J Appl Polym Sci 2010, 115:504-513.
  • [13]Reddy AVR, Patel HR: Chemically treated polyethersulfone/polyacrylonitrile blend ultrafiltration membranes for better fouling resistance. Desalination 2008, 221:318-323.
  • [14]Rahimpour A, Madaeni SS, Mehdipour-Ataei S: Synthesis of a novel poly (amide-imide) (PAI) and preparation and characterization of PAI blended polyethersulfone (PES) membranes. J Membr Sci 2008, 311:349-359.
  • [15]Rahman NA, Maruyama T, Matsuyama H: Performance of polyethersulfone /tetronic-1307 hollow fiber membrane for drinking water production. J Appl Sci Environ Sanit 2008, 3:1-7.
  • [16]Rahimpour A, Madaeni SS, Mansour panah Y: The effect of anionic, non-ionic and cationic surfactants on morphology and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for milk concentration. J Membr Sci 2007, 296:110-121.
  • [17]Amirilargani M, Saljoughi E, Mohammadi T: Effects of tween 80 concentration as a surfactant additive on morphology and permeability of flat sheet polyethersulfone (PES) membranes. Desalination 2009, 249:837-842.
  • [18]Salager JL: Surfactants-Types and Uses, Version2. Merida-Venezuela: Laboratory of Formulation, Interfaces Rheology and Processes (FIRP); 2002:1-49.
  • [19]Ghaemi N, Madaeni SS, Alizadeh A, Daraei P, Vatanpour V, Falsafi M: Fabrication of cellulose acetate/sodium dodecyl sulfate nanofiltration membrane characterization and performance in rejection of pesticides. Desalination 2012, 290:99-106.
  • [20]Abachi MQA, Haddi H, Abachi AMA: Spectrophotometric determination of amoxicillin by reaction with N, N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine and potassium hexacyanoferrate (III). Anal Chim Acta 2005, 554:184-189.
  • [21]Saljoughi E, Mousavi SM: Preparation and characterization of novel polysulfone nanofiltration membranes for removal of cadmium from contaminated water. Sep Purif Technol 2012, 90:22-30.
  • [22]Saljoughi E, Amirilargani M, Mohammadi T: Effect of PEG additive and coagulation bath temperature on the morphology, permeability and thermal/chemical stability of asymmetric CA membranes. Desalination 2010, 262:72-78.
  • [23]Saljoughi E, Amirilargani M, Mohammadi T: Asymmetric cellulose acetatedialysis membranes: synthesis, characterization, and performance. J Appl Polym Sci 2010, 116:2251-2259.
  • [24]Saljoughi E, Amirilargani M, Mohammadi T: Effect of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) concentration and coagulation bath temperature on the morphology, permeability and thermal stability of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 2009, 111:2537-2544.
  • [25]Mousavi SM, Saljoughi E, Sheikhi-Kouhsar MR: Preparation and characterization of nanoporous polysulfone membranes with high hydrophilic property using variation in CBT and addition of tetronic-1107 surfactant. J Appl Polym Sci 2012, 127:4177-4185.
  • [26]Saljoughi E, Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T: Effect of preparation variables on morphology and pure water permeation flux through asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes. J Membr Sci 2009, 326:627-634.
  • [27]Amirilargani M, Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T: Synthesis and characterization of polyethersulfone membranes. J Polym Res 2010, 17:363-377.
  • [28]Boussu K, Van der Bruggen B, Volodin A, Van Haesendonck C, Delcour JA, Van der Meeren P, Vandecasteele C: Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes and comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination 2006, 191:245-253.
  • [29]Stefan B, Marius B, Lidia B: New technologies and products in machine manufacturing technologies. TEHNOMUS 2011, 18:227-232.
  • [30]Susanto H, Ulbricht M: Characteristics, performance and stability of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes prepared by phase separation method using different macro molecular additives. J Membr Sci 2009, 327:125-135.
  • [31]Amirilargani M, Saljoughi E, Mohammadi T, Moghbeli MR: Effects of coagulation bath temperature and polyvinylpyrrolidone content on flat sheet asymmetric polyethersulfone membranes. Polym Eng Sci 2010, 50:885-893.
  • [32]Ghaemi N, Madaeni SS, Alizadeh A, Daraei P, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimpour F: Separation of nitrophenols using cellulose acetate nanofiltration membrane: influence of surfactant additives. Sep Purif Technol 2012, 85:147-156.
  • [33]Li P, Li J, Wu C, Wu Q, Li J: Synergistic antibacterial effects of β-lactam antibiotic combined with silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16:1912-1917.
  • [34]Nghiem LD, Schafer AI, Elimelech M: Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39:7698-7705.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:161次 浏览次数:39次