The relevance of timing of illness and death events in the household life cycle for coping outcomes in rural Uganda in the era of HIV

International Journal for Equity in Health

Janet Seeley²  Flora Hajdu¹  Jovita Amurwon³ 

[1] Department of Urban and Rural Developmen, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SE-750 07, Sweden;London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute, Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda

关键词: Coping;    Struggling;    Shock;    Longitudinal studies;    Livelihood;    Diversification;    Dependency-ratio;    Capability;    Age;   

Others  :  1231351
DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0253-0

 received in 2014-10-14, accepted in 2015-10-21,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Predicting the household’s ability to cope with adult illness and death can be complicated in low-income countries with high HIV prevalence and multiple other stressors and shocks. This study explored the link between stage of the household in the life cycle and the household’s capacity to cope with illness and death of adults in rural Uganda.

Methods

Interviews focusing on life histories were combined with observations during monthly visits to 22 households throughout 2009, and recorded livelihood activities and responses to illness and death events. For the analysis, households were categorised into three life cycle stages (‘Young’, ‘Middle-aged’ and ‘Old’) and the ability to cope and adapt to recorded events of prolonged illness or death was assessed.

Results

In 16 of the 26 recorded events, a coping or struggling outcome was found to be related to household life cycle stage. ‘Young’ households usually had many dependants too young to contribute significantly to livelihoods, so were vulnerable to illness or death of the household head specifically. ‘Middle-aged’ households had adult children who participated in activities that contributed to livelihoods at home or sent remittances. More household members meant livelihood diversification, so these households usually coped best. Worst off were ‘Old’ households, where members were unable to work hard and often supported young grandchildren, while their adult children had stopped sending remittances as they had established households of their own.

Conclusions

While households may adopt diverse coping mechanisms, the stage in the household life cycle when stressful events occur is important for coping outcomes. Households of the elderly and households with many young dependents are clearly vulnerable. These results demonstrate that household life cycle analysis can be useful in assessing ability to respond to stressors and shocks, including AIDS-related illness and death.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Amurwon et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Barnett T, Blaikie P. AIDS in Africa: its present and future impact. 1992: Guilford Press.
• [2]Serwadda D, Mugerwa RD, Sewankambo NK, Lwegaba A, Carswell JW, Kirya GB. Slim disease: a new disease in Uganda and its association with HTLV-III infection. Lancet. 1985;326(8460):849–52.
• [3]Barnett T. A long-wave event. HIV/AIDS, politics, governance and ‘security’: Sundering the intergenerational bond? International Affairs, 2006. 82(2): p. 297-313 + ii.
• [4]Ekoru K, Bukenya D, Lutalo T, Pain A, Seeley J. The longitudinal impact of HIV and AIDS on rural livelihoods in East Africa, (MRC/UVRI and RHSP Uganda component), in A report for the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 2010
• [5]Hosegood V. The demographic impact of HIV and AIDS across the family and household life-cycle: Implications for efforts to strengthen families in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Care. 2009;21 Suppl 1:13–21.
• [6]Taylor B, Bukenya D, van Asten P, Agol D, Pain A, Seeley J et al.. Review: The impact of HIV on agricultural livelihoods in southern Uganda and the challenges of attribution. Tropical Med Int Health. 2011; 16(3):324-333.
• [7]Mushongah J. Dimensions of Vulnerability: The Impact of HIV/AIDS on Livelihoods in Southern Zimbabwe, 1986–2007. J South Afr Stud. 2012; 38(3):551-577.
• [8]Drinkwater M, McEwan M, Samuels F. The Effects of HIV/AIDS on Agricultural Production Systems in Zambia: A Restudy 1993–2005. IFPRI RENEWAL report, 2006
• [9]Hosegood V, Preston-Whyte E, Busza J, Moitse S, Timaeus IM. Revealing the full extent of households’ experiences of HIV and AIDS in rural South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(6):1249–59.
• [10]Loewenson R, Hadingham J, Whiteside A. Household impacts of AIDS: Using a life course approach to identify effective, poverty-reducing interventions for prevention, treatment and care. AIDS Care. 2009; 21(8):1032-1041.
• [11]Moen P, Firebaugh FM. Family policies and effective families: A life course perspective. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. 1994; 14(1/2):29-52.
• [12]Cain MT. The Household Life Cycle and Economic Mobility in Rural Bangladesh. Popul Dev Rev. 1978; 4(3):421-438.
• [13]Nasirumbi P, Seeley J, Floyd S. Household Surveys - Using Qualitative Data to Enhance Our Understanding of Household Dynamics over Time, in Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. p. 19.
• [14]Golaz V, Rutaremwa G. The vulnerability of older adults: what do census data say? An application to Uganda. African Population Studies, 2011. 25(2).
• [15]Asiki G, Murphy G, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, Seeley J, Nsubuga RN, Karabarinde A et al.. The general population cohort in rural south-western Uganda: a platform for communicable and non-communicable disease studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42(1):129-141.
• [16]Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994: Sage.
• [17]Merriam S. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 2014: John Wiley & Sons.
• [18]Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills; 1985.
• [19]Rugalema G. Coping or Struggling? A Journey into the Impact of HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 2000; 27(86):537-545.
• [20]Van Rooyen J, Du P. Plessis, A conceptual and empirical validation of the household lifecycle concept in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2003. 29(3)
• [21]Baylies C. The impact of AIDS on rural households in Africa: a shock like any other? Dev Chang. 2002; 33(4):611-632.
• [22]UNAIDS, Global Report. 2012: AIDSinfo.
• [23]Seeley J, Dercon S, Barnett T. The effects of HIV/AIDS on rural communities in East Africa: a 20‐year perspective. Tropical Med Int Health. 2010; 15(3):329-335.