Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials

João C Belloti¹  Flavio Faloppa¹  João B G dos Santos¹  Marcelo H Matsumoto¹  Marcel J S Tamaoki¹  Fabio T Matsunaga¹ 

[1] Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil

关键词: Orthopaedic fixation devices;    Internal;    Fracture fixation;    Immobilisation;    Humeral fractures;   

Others  :  1093278
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-246

 received in 2012-05-30, accepted in 2013-08-01,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace.

Methods/Design

This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. The primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs.

Discussion

According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN24835397

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Matsunaga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Emmett JE, Breck LW: A review and analysis of 11,000 fractures seen in a private practice of orthopaedic surgery, 1937–1956. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958, 40-A:1169-1175.
• [2]Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Talbot M: Fractures of the humeral shaft. In Skeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management and Reconstruction. volume 2. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008:1593-1594.
• [3]Rose SH, Melton LJ 3rd, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL: Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 1982, 168:24-30.
• [4]Brinker MR, O’Connor DP: The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:290-297.
• [5]Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidemark J, Hanson K, Törnkvist H, Ponser S: Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88-B:1469-1473.
• [6]Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG: Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59:596-601.
• [7]Balfour GW, Marrero CE: Fracture brace for the treatment of humerus shaft fractures caused by gunshot wounds. Orthop Clin North Am 1995, 26:55-63.
• [8]Rosenberg N, Soudry M: Shoulder impairment following treatment of diaphysial fractures of humerus by functional brace. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006, 126:437-440.
• [9]Denard A Jr, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, Tucker MC, Floyd M, Herzog GA: Outcome of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics 2010, 11:33(8).
• [10]Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA: Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma 1997, 11:283-287.
• [11]Amillo S, Barrios RH, Martinez-Peric R, Losada JI: Surgical treatment of the radial nerve lesions associated with fractures of the humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1993, 7:211-215.
• [12]Foster RJ, Swiontkowski MF, Bach AW, Sack JT: Radial nerve palsy caused by open humeral shaft fractures. J Hand Surg 1993, 18:121-124.
• [13]Pollock FH, Drake D, Bovill EG, Day L, Trafton PG: Treatment of radial neuropathy associated with fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981, 63:239-243.
• [14]Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H, Adami J, Ponzer S: Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006, 20:591-596.
• [15]Rutgers M, Ring D: Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 2006, 20:597-601.
• [16]Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D: Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:2343-2347.
• [17]Bell MJ, Beauchamp CG, Kellam JK, McMurty RY: The results of plating humeral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries: the Sunnybrook experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985, 67:293-296.
• [18]Dabezies EJ, Banta CJ, Murphy CP, d’Ambrosia RD: Plate fixation of the humeral shaft for acute fractures with and without radial nerve injuries. J Orthop Trauma 1992, 6:10-13.
• [19]Heim D, Herkert F, Hess P, Regazzoni P: Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures: the Basel experience. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 1993, 35:226-232.
• [20]Robinson CM, Bell KM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM: Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74:558-562.
• [21]Crolla RMPH, de Vries LS, Clevers GJ: Locked intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures. Injury 1993, 24:403-405.
• [22]Habernek H, Orthner E: A locking nail for fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:651-653.
• [23]Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG: Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011., 15CD005959
• [24]Livani B, Belangero WD: Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury 2004, 35:587-595.
• [25]Zhiquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, Chi Z, Peiyan H: Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007, 21:628-633.
• [26]Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, Mei GH: Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007, 127:531-535.
• [27]An Z, Zeng B, He X, Chen Q, Hu S: Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeralshaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique. Int Orthop 2010, 34:131-135.
• [28]Gosler MW, Testroote M, Morrenhof J, Janzing HM: Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 18:1. CD00832
• [29]Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010, 8:18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996, 29:602-608.
• [31]Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003, 4:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Drozd M, Miles S: Davies J: Casting: U-slabs. Emerg Nurse 2009, 17:20-22.
• [33]Flandry F, Hunt JP, Terry GC, Hughstons JC: Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales. Am L Sport Med 1991, 19:112-118.
• [34]Orfale AG, Araujo PMP, Ferraz MB, Natour J: Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005, 38:293-302.
• [35]Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Taromi B, Akl EA, Bassler D, Alonso-Coello P, Rigau D, Bryant D, Smith SE, Walter SD, Guyatt GH: Blinding of outcomes in trials of orthopaedic trauma: an opportunity to enhance the validity of clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:1026-1033.
• [36]Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483.
• [37]Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR: Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 1999, 39:143-150.
• [38]Constant CR, Murley AH: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 214:160-164.
• [39]Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ: Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 2005, 29:10-13.