Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research

Implementation Science

Paul Cairney¹  Kerstin Roback³  Christian Ståhl²  Per Nilsen³ 

[1] Division of History and Politics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland;National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden;Division of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden

关键词: Interdisciplinarity;    Context;    Determinants;    Bottom-up;    Top-down;    Implementation;    Policy;   

Others  :  813591
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-5908-8-63

 received in 2013-01-12, accepted in 2013-05-29,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science.

Discussion

Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature.

Summary

There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Nilsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Grol R: Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001, 39:46-54.
• [2]Korenstein D, Keyhani S, Mendelson A, Ross JS: Adherence of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals to FDA guidelines and content for safe prescribing. PLoS One 2011, 6:e23336.
• [3]McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2635-2645.
• [4]Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO: Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care 2001, 10:152-158.
• [5]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Ten great public health achievements – United States, 1990–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999, 48:241-243.
• [6]Howlett M, Ramesh M: Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
• [7]Winter SC: Implementation. In Handbook of Public Policy. Edited by Peters BG, Pierre J. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006:151-166.
• [8]O’Toole LJ Jr: Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects. J Public Admin Res Theory 2000, 10:263-288.
• [9]Schofield J: Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Int J Manag Rev 2001, 3:245-263.
• [10]O’Toole LJ Jr: The theory-practice issue in policy implementation research. Public Admin 2004, 82:309-329.
• [11]Barrett SM: Implementation studies: time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Admin 2004, 82:249-262.
• [12]Schofield J, Sausman C: Symposium on implementing public policy: learning from theory and practice. Introduction. Public Admin 2004, 82:235-248.
• [13]Saetren H: Facts and myths about research on public policy implementation: out-of-fashion, allegedly dead, but still very much alive and relevant. Policy Stud J 2005, 33:559-582.
• [14]Sabatier PA: Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2007.
• [15]Hill M: The Public Policy Process. 5th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009.
• [16]Hill M, Hupe P: Implementing Public Policy. 2nd edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
• [17]Paudel NR: A critical account of policy implementation theories: status and reconsideration. Nepalese J Public Policy Govern 2009, 25:36-54.
• [18]Johansson S: Implementing evidence-based practices and programmes in the human services: lessons from research in public administration. Eur J Social Work 2010, 13:109-125.
• [19]Cairney P: Understanding Public Policy – Theories and Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
• [20]John P: Analyzing Public Policy. 2nd edition. London: Routledge; 2012.
• [21]Trinder L, Reynolds S: Evidence-based practice – a critical appraisal. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2000.
• [22]Grol R, Jones R: Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract 2000, 17:S32-S35.
• [23]Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations: a Systematic Literature Review. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
• [24]Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M: Improving Patient Care: the Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005.
• [25]Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJE, Hofmeyer A: A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26:25-36.
• [26]Scott NA, Moga C, Barton P, Rashiq S, Schopflocher D, Taenzer P, Harstall C on behalf of the Alberta Ambassador Program Team: Creating clinically relevant knowledge from systematic reviews: the challenges of knowledge translation. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13:681-688.
• [27]Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO: Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.
• [28]Estabrooks CA, Derksen L, Winther C, Lavis JN, Scott SD, Wallin L, Profetto-McGrath J: The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implement Sci 2008, 3:49. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID: Knowledge Translation in Health Care – Moving from Evidence to Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2009.
• [30]Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T: Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
• [31]Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK: Dissemination and implementation research in health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
• [32]Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE: Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012, 7:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Pressman JL, Wildavsky A: Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1973.
• [34]Rothstein B: Just institutions matter. The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
• [35]Lipsky M: Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Sage Publications; 1980.
• [36]Hanf K, Scharpf FW: Interorganizational policy making: limits to Co-ordination and central control. London: Sage Publications; 1978.
• [37]Hjern B: Implementation research – the link gone missing. J Public Policy 1982, 2:301-308.
• [38]Hull C, Hjern B: Helping small firms grow. London: Croom Helm; 1987.
• [39]Sabatier PA: Top down and bottom up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy 1986, 6:21-48.
• [40]Matland RE: Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. J Public Admin Res Theory 1995, 5:145-177.
• [41]Van Meter D, Van Horn CE: The policy implementation process, a conceptual framework. Admin Soc 1975, 6:445-488.
• [42]Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA: Implementation and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman: Glenview, IL; 1983.
• [43]Winter S: Integrating implementation research. In Implementation and the Policy Process. Edited by Palumbo DJ, Calista DJ. New York: Greenwood Press; 1990:19-38.
• [44]Goggin ML, Bowman AOM, Lester JP, O’Toole LJ Jr: Implementation theory and practice: toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Foresman/Little, Brown; 1990.
• [45]Cairney P: Implementation and the governance problem a pressure participant perspective. Public Policy and Administration 2009, 24:355-377.
• [46]Ferlie E, Pettigrew A, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L: The New public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
• [47]Newman J: Constructing accountability: Network governance and managerial agency. Public Policy and Administration 2004, 19:17-33.
• [48]Bevir M, Rhodes R: Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge; 2003.
• [49]Room G: Complexity, institutions and public policy: agile decision-making in a turbulent world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2011.
• [50]Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC: Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1993.
• [51]Weible C, Sabatier P, McQueen K: Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Stud J 2009, 37:121-141.
• [52]Cairney P, Studlar D, Mamudu M: Global tobacco control: power, policy, governance and transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012.
• [53]Chambers D: Foreword. In Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. Edited by Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:vii-x.
• [54]Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E: Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet 2004, 364:1615-1621.
• [55]Brownson RC, Dreisinger M, Colditz GA, Proctor EK: The path forward in dissemination and implementation research. In Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. Edited by Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:498-508.
• [56]Smith K, Larimer C: The public policy primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2009.
• [57]Grol R: Implementation of changes in practice. In Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005:6-14.
• [58]Grol R, Wensing M, Hulscher M, Eccles M: Theories on implementation of change in healthcare. In Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005:15-40.
• [59]Graham ID, Tetroe J, KT Theories Group: Planned action theories. In Knowledge translation in health care – moving from evidence to practice. Edited by Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2009:185-195.
• [60]Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seer K, Titchen A: Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci 2008, 3:1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [61]Titler MG, Kleiber C, Steelman VJ, Rake BA, Budreau G, Everett LQ, Buckwalter KC, Tripp-Reimer T, Goode CJ: The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care. Crit Care Nurse Clin North Am 2001, 13:497-509.
• [62]Graham ID, Tetroe J: How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action. Healthcare Q 2007, 10:20-22.
• [63]Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009, 4:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [64]Nilsen P, Roback K, Krevers B: Förklaringsfaktorer för implementeringsutfall – ett ramverk [Factors that explain implementation outcomes - a framework]. In Implementering: Teori och Tillämpning inom Hälso- och Sjukvården [Implementation: Theory and Applications in Health Care]. Edited by Nilsen P. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2010:71-90.
• [65]Bucknall T, Rycroft-Malone J: Evidence-based practice: doing the right thing for patients. In Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice. Edited by Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:1-22.
• [66]Wilson R: Policy analysis as policy advice. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Edited by Moran M, Rein M, Goodin RE. Oxford: Oxford Publishing; 2006:152-168.
• [67]May PJ: Policy design and implementation. In Handbook of Public Administration. Edited by Peters G, Pierre J. London: Sage Publications; 2003:223-233.
• [68]Lowi T: Four systems of policy, politics and choice. Public Admin Rev 1972, 32:298-310.
• [69]John P: Making Policy Work. London: Routledge; 2011.
• [70]Ingram H, Schneider A, DeLeon P: Social construction and policy design. In Theories of the Policy Process. Edited by Sabatier P. Cambridge, MA: Westview; 2007:93-126.
• [71]Marchionni C, Ritchie J: Organizational factors that support the implementation of a nursing best practice guideline. J Nurs Manag 2008, 16:266-274.
• [72]Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Scott S, Cummings GG, Kang SH, Midodzi WK, Stevens B: Assessment of variation in the Alberta Context Tool: the contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings. BMC Health Services Res 2011, 11:251. BioMed Central Full Text
• [73]Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. New York: Free Press; 2003.
• [74]Grol R, Wensing M: Selection of strategies. In Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005:122-134.
• [75]Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8:1-72.
• [76]Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, DeLong ER, Lytle BL, Brindis RG, Smith SC Jr, Pollack CV Jr, Newby LK, Harrington RA, Gibler WB, Ohman EM: Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2006, 295:1912-1920.
• [77]Smith W: Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques to change physician behavior. Chest 2000, 118:8S-17S.
• [78]Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R: Developing and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action. CMAJ 2010, 182:E85-E88.
• [79]Dopson S, Fitzgerald L: The active role of context. In Knowledge to Action? Evidence-Based Care in Context. Edited by Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:79-103.
• [80]Aarons GA, Horowitz JD, Dlugosz LR, Erhart MG: The role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research. In Dissemination and implementation research in health. Edited by Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:128-153.
• [81]Rabin BA, Brownson RC: Developing the terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. Edited by Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:23-54.
• [82]Ferlie E: Conclusion: from evidence to actionable knowledge? In Knowledge to action? evidence-based care in context. Edited by Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:182-197.
• [83]Parchman ML, Scoglio CM, Schumm P: Understanding the implementation of evidence-based care: a structural network approach. Implement Sci 2011, 6:14-23. BioMed Central Full Text
• [84]Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J: Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2012. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187
• [85]Wensing M, Grol R: Characteristics of successful interventions. In Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005:60-70.
• [86]Trinder L: A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In Evidence-based practice – a critical appraisal. Edited by Trinder L, Reynolds S. Oxford: Oxford Publishing; 2000:212-241.
• [87]Braun E, Landsman K, Zuckerman R, Berger G, Meilik A, Azzam ZS, American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, European Society of Cardiology: Adherence to guidelines improves the clinical outcome of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Isr Med Assoc J 2009, 11:348-353.
• [88]Hubbard IJ, Harris D, Kilkenny MF, Faux SG, Pollack MR, Cadilhac DA: Adherence to clinical guidelines improves patient outcomes in Australian audit of stroke rehabilitation practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 93:965-971.
• [89]Moore BM, Laguna TA, Liu M, McNamara JJ: Increased adherence to CFF practice guidelines for pulmonary medications correlates with improved FEV1. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012. doi:10.1002/ppul.22665
• [90]Hood C: Public service management by numbers: why does it vary? where has it come from? what are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money Management 2007, 27:95-102.
• [91]Meyer JW, Rowan B: Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 1977, 83:340-363.
• [92]DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW: The Iron Cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 1983, 48:147-160.