Validity, intra- and inter-observer reliability of automated devices for the assessment of ankle brachial index using photo-plethysmography

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Markus Scholz¹  Markus Loeffler¹  Kerstin Wirkner³  Frank Beutner²  Andrej Teren² 

[1] Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, LIFE, University of Leipzig, Haertelstrasse 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany;Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center of the University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany;LIFE- Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

关键词: Vicorder;    Vascular explorer;    Feasibility;    Ankle-brachial index;   

Others  :  856816
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2261-13-81

 received in 2013-03-18, accepted in 2013-10-03,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Ankle-brachial-Index (ABI) measured by manual Dopplersonography is an easily assessable marker of global cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to establish novel photo-plethysmography (PPG)-based ABI assessments in an epidemiologic context and to compare its results with those of Doppler.

Methods

Two devices for PPG-based ABI assessments (Vicorder, Vascular Explorer) were tested and compared against Doppler in 56 putatively healthy subjects. We determined acceptance, time requirements, agreement of repeat measurements, agreement with Doppler and intra- and inter-observer concordances for both devices and compared the results. Differences between cuff inflation- and deflation-based methods were also studied for Vascular Explorer.

Results

Acceptance was similar for both devices but Vascular Explorer was more time consuming. Agreement of multiple measurements was moderate for both methods highlighting the importance of measurement replicates. Both automated devices showed significantly higher ABI compared to Doppler which can be traced back to higher brachial pressures (Vicorder) or higher ankle pressures (Vascular Explorer). This effect is more pronounced for Vascular Explorer but can be ameliorated using the deflation method of measurement. Intra-observer concordances were similar. Inter-observer concordance was non-significantly better for Vicorder.

Conclusions

Both devices proved to be feasible in epidemiologic studies, but compared to Doppler, do not constitute an advantage regarding time requirement and accuracy of ABI assessment. Since PPG-based ABI values are inflated compared to Doppler, it will be necessary to adjust Doppler-based cut-offs for risk stratification.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Teren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Morillas P, Cordero A, Bertomeu V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Quiles J, Guindo J, Soria F, Mazon P, Nieto V, Anguita M, et al.: Prognostic value of low ankle-brachial index in patients with hypertension and acute coronary syndromes. J Hypertens 2009, 27(2):341-347.
• [2]Heald CL, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Price JF: Risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with the ankle-brachial index: systematic review. Atherosclerosis 2006, 189(1):61-69.
• [3]Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, Bond MG, Clark LT, Criqui MH, Crouse JR 3rd, Friedman L, Fuster V, Herrington DM, et al.: Prevention conference V: beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: writing group III. Circulation 2000, 101(1):E16-22.
• [4]Beutner F, Teren A, Gielen S, Schuler G, Wirkner K, Tiller D, Loeffler M, Scholz M: Automated photoplethysmography-based determination of ankle-brachial index: a validation study against Doppler sonography. Clin Res Cardiol 2012, 101(11):875-83. doi:10.1007/s00392-012-0471-z Epub 2012 May 15. PubMed PMID: 22584382
• [5]Beutner F, Teupser D, Gielen S, Holdt LM, Scholz M, Boudriot E, Schuler G, Thiery J: Rationale and design of the Leipzig (LIFE) heart study: phenotyping and cardiovascular characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS One 2011, 6(12):e29070.
• [6]Lin LI: A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989, 45(1):255-268.
• [7]Barnhart HX, Haber M, Song J: Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 2002, 58(4):1020-1027.
• [8]Efron B: Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika 1981, 68(3):589-599.
• [9]Jobbagy A: Using photoplethysmographic signal for increasing the accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurement. Proc Est Acad Sci Eng 2004, 10(2):110-122.