期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Monitoring sedation for bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients by using the Ramsay sedation scale versus auditory-evoked potentials
Kam-Fai Wong4  David Lin Lee2  Kuo-An Chu2  Shu-Fen Sun1  Chien-Wei Hsu3 
[1] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung First Road, Kaohsiung City 813, Taiwan;Chest Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1st Road, 813 Kaohsiung City, Taiwan;Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, 155 sec.2 Linong Street, Taipei City 112, Taiwan;Institute of Statistics, National University of Kaohsiung, 700 Kaohsiung University Road, Nanzih District, Kaohsiung City 811, Taiwan
关键词: Sedation;    Ramsay sedation score;    Critical care;    Bronchoscopy;    Auditory-evoked potential;   
Others  :  865435
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2466-14-15
 received in 2013-11-04, accepted in 2014-02-03,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Appropriate sedation benefits patients by reducing the stress response, but it requires an appropriate method of assessment to adjust the dosage of sedatives. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in the sedation of mechanically ventilated patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FB) monitored by auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) or the Ramsay sedation scale (RSS).

Methods

In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, all patients who underwent FB with propofol sedation were monitored and their sedation adjusted. During FB, one group was monitored by AEP and another group was monitored by RSS. The propofol dosage was adjusted by the nursing staff during examination to maintain the Alaris AEP index (AAI) value between 25 and 40 in the AEP group and the RSS at 5 or 6 in the RSS group. Before FB and during FB, the AAI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded every 5 min. The percentages of time at the sedation target and the propofol dosages were calculated.

Results

Nineteen patients received AEP monitoring and 18 patients received RSS monitoring. The percentage of time at the sedation target during FB was significantly higher in the AEP monitoring group (51.3%; interquartile range [IQR], 47.0–63.5%) than in the RSS group (15.4%; IQR, 9.5–23.4%), (P < 0.001). During FB, the RSS group had a significantly higher AAI (P = 0.011), HR (P < 0.001), and MAP (P < 0.001) than the AEP group.

Conclusions

In mechanically ventilated patients undergoing FB, AEP monitoring resulted in less variation in AAI, HR, and MAP, and a higher percentage of time at the sedation target than RSS monitoring.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01448811.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hsu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140726072854670.pdf 730KB PDF download
100KB Image download
79KB Image download
23KB Image download
32KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Diette GB, White P, Terry P, Jenckes M, Wise RA, Rubin HR: Quality assessment through patient self-report of symptoms prefiberoptic and postfiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1998, 114:1446-1453.
  • [2]Putinati S, Ballerin L, Corbetta L, Trevisani L, Potena A: Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for bronchoscopy. Chest 1999, 115:1437-1440.
  • [3]Wahidi MM, Jain P, Jantz M, Lee P, Mackensen GB, Barbour SY, Lamb C, Silvestri GA: American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the use of topical anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in adult patients. Chest 2011, 140:1342-1350.
  • [4]Cohen D, Horiuchi K, Kemper M, Weissman C: Modulating effects of propofol on metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to stressful intensive care unit procedures. Crit Care Med 1996, 24:612-617.
  • [5]Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB: Clinical practice guideline for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:119-141.
  • [6]Walder B, Tramèr MR: Analgesia and sedation in critically ill patients. Swiss Med Wkly 2004, 134:333-346.
  • [7]Kress JP, Hall JB: Sedation in the mechanically ventilated patient. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:2541-2546.
  • [8]Thornton C, Sharpe RM: Evoked responses in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1998, 81:771-781.
  • [9]Olson DM, Thoyre SM, Auyong DB: Perspectives on sedation assessment in critical care. AACN Adv Crit Care 2007, 18:380-395.
  • [10]Lu CH, Ou-Yang HY, Man KM, Hsiao PC, Ho ST, Wong CS: Relative reliability of the auditory evoked potential and bispectral index for monitoring sedation level in surgical intensive care patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008, 36:553-559.
  • [11]Thornton C: Evoked potentials in anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1991, 8:89-107.
  • [12]Iselin-Chaves IA, EI Moalem HE, Gan TJ, Ginsberg B, Glass PS: Changes in the auditory-evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 2000, 92:1300-1310.
  • [13]Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13:818-829.
  • [14]Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R: Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 1974, 2:656-659.
  • [15]Doi M, Morita K, Mantzaridis H, Sato S, Kenny GN: Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:41-47.
  • [16]Carrasco G: Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care 2000, 4:217-225. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Gonzalez R, De-La-Rosa-Ramirez I, Maldonado-Hernandez A, Dominquez-Cherit G: Should patients undergoing a bronchoscopy be sedated? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003, 47:411-415.
  • [18]Young C, Knudsen N, Hilton A, Reves JG: Sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2000, 28:854-866.
  • [19]Woods JC, Mion LC, Connor JT, Viray F, Jahan L, Huber C, McHugh R, Gonzale JP, Stoller JK, Arroliga AC: Severe agitation among ventilated medical intensive care unit patients: frequency, characteristics and outcomes. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1066-1072.
  • [20]Azoulay E, Mokart D, Rabbat A, Pene F, Kouatchet A, Bruneel F, Vincent F, Hamidfar R, Moreau D, Mohammedi I, Epinette G, Beduneau G, Castelain V, de Lassence A, Gruson D, Lemiale V, Renard B, Chevret S, Schlemmer B: Diagnostic bronchoscopy in hematology and oncology patients with acute respiratory failure: prospective multicenter data. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:100-107.
  • [21]Kress JP, O’Connor MF, Pohlman AS, Olson D, Lavoie A, Toledano A, Hall JB: Sedation of critically ill patients during mechanical ventilation. A comparison of propofol and midazolam. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996, 153:1012-1018.
  • [22]Lamas A, López-Herce J, Sancho L, Mencía S, Carrillo A, Santiago MJ, Martínez V: Assessing sedation in critically ill children by bispectral index, auditory-evoked potentials and clinical scales. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:2092-2099.
  • [23]Musialowicz T, Hynynen M, Yppärilä H, Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Jakob SM: Midlatency auditory-evoked potentials in the assessment of sedation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004, 18:559-562.
  • [24]Sessler CN, Grap MJ, Ramsay MA: Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2008, 12:S2.
  • [25]De Jonghe B, Cook D, Appere-De-Vecchi C, Guyatt G, Meade M, Outin H: Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26:275-285.
  • [26]Hansen-Flaschen J, Cowen J, Polomano RC: Beyond the Ramsay scale: need for a validated measure of sedating drug efficacy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:732-733.
  • [27]Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL: Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:1325-1329.
  • [28]Mirski MA, LeDroux SN, Lewin JJ 3rd, Thompson CB, Mirski KT, Griswold M: Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1674-1684.
  • [29]Ge SJ, Zhuang XL, He RH, Wang YT, Zhang X, Huang SW: Neuromuscular block with vecuronium reduces the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index during steady state anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2003, 50:1017-1022.
  • [30]Absalom AR, Sutcliffe N, Kenny GN: Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2001, 87:778-780.
  • [31]Sessler CN, Varney K: Patient-focused sedation and analgesia in the ICU. Chest 2008, 133:552-565.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:45次 浏览次数:12次