Structural analysis of eyespots: dynamics of morphogenic signals that govern elemental positions in butterfly wings

BMC Systems Biology

Joji M Otaki¹ 

[1] The BCPH Unit of Molecular Physiology, Department of Chemistry, Biology and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, 903-0213, Japan

关键词: Morphogenic signal;    Induction model;    Parafocal element;    Eyespot;    Colour-pattern determination;    Butterfly wing;   

Others  :  1144704
DOI  :  10.1186/1752-0509-6-17

 received in 2011-12-20, accepted in 2012-03-13,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

To explain eyespot colour-pattern determination in butterfly wings, the induction model has been discussed based on colour-pattern analyses of various butterfly eyespots. However, a detailed structural analysis of eyespots that can serve as a foundation for future studies is still lacking. In this study, fundamental structural rules related to butterfly eyespots are proposed, and the induction model is elaborated in terms of the possible dynamics of morphogenic signals involved in the development of eyespots and parafocal elements (PFEs) based on colour-pattern analysis of the nymphalid butterfly Junonia almana.

Results

In a well-developed eyespot, the inner black core ring is much wider than the outer black ring; this is termed the inside-wide rule. It appears that signals are wider near the focus of the eyespot and become narrower as they expand. Although fundamental signal dynamics are likely to be based on a reaction-diffusion mechanism, they were described well mathematically as a type of simple uniformly decelerated motion in which signals associated with the outer and inner black rings of eyespots and PFEs are released at different time points, durations, intervals, and initial velocities into a two-dimensional field of fundamentally uniform or graded resistance; this produces eyespots and PFEs that are diverse in size and structure. The inside-wide rule, eyespot distortion, structural differences between small and large eyespots, and structural changes in eyespots and PFEs in response to physiological treatments were explained well using mathematical simulations. Natural colour patterns and previous experimental findings that are not easily explained by the conventional gradient model were also explained reasonably well by the formal mathematical simulations performed in this study.

Conclusions

In a mode free from speculative molecular interactions, the present study clarifies fundamental structural rules related to butterfly eyespots, delineates a theoretical basis for the induction model, and proposes a mathematically simple mode of long-range signalling that may reflect developmental mechanisms associated with butterfly eyespots.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Otaki; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Nijhout HF: Pattern formation on lepidopteran wings: determination of an eyespot. Dev Biol 1980, 80:275-288.
• [2]Nijhout HF: Cautery-induced colour patterns in Precis coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Embryol Exp Morphol 1985, 86:191-203.
• [3]French V, Brakefield PM: The development of eyespot patterns on butterfly wings: morphogen sources or sinks? Development 1992, 116:103-109.
• [4]French V, Brakefield PM: Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the focal signal. Dev Biol 1995, 168:112-123.
• [5]Brakefield PM, French V: Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the epidermal response to damage. Dev Biol 1995, 168:98-111.
• [6]Otaki JM, Ogasawara T, Yamamoto H: Morphological comparison of pupal wing cuticle patterns in butterflies. Zool Sci 2005, 22:21-34.
• [7]Wolpert L: Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol 1969, 25:1-47.
• [8]Nijhout HF: The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Washington, USA: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1991.
• [9]Nijhout HF: Elements of butterfly wing patterns. J Exp Zool 2001, 291:213-225.
• [10]Monteiro A, Glaser G, Stockslager S, Glansdorp N, Ramos D: Comparative insights into questions of lepidopteran wing pattern homology. BMC Dev Biol 2006, 6:52. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Carroll SB, Gates J, Keys DN, Paddock SW, Panganiban GEF, Selegue JE, Williams JA: Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 1994, 265:109-114.
• [12]Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, Kesbeke F, Wijngaarden PJ, Monteiro A, French V, Carroll SB: Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 1996, 384:236-242.
• [13]Brunetti CR, Selegue JE, Monteiro A, French V, Brakefield PM, Carroll SB: The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr Biol 2001, 11:1578-1585.
• [14]Otaki JM: Color-pattern analysis of eyespots in butterfly wings: a critical examination of morphogen gradient models. Zool Sci 2011, 28:403-413.
• [15]Otaki JM: Generation of butterfly wing eyespot patterns: a model for morphological determination of eyespot and parafocal element. Zool Sci 2011, 28:817-827.
• [16]Gierer A, Meinhardt H: A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 1972, 12:30-39.
• [17]Meinhardt H: Models of biological pattern formation. London, UK: Academic Press; 1982.
• [18]Meinhardt H, Gierer A: Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. BioEssays 2000, 22:753-760.
• [19]Otaki JM: Artificially induced changes of butterfly wing colour patterns: dynamic signal interactions in eyespot development. Sci Rep 2011, 1:111.
• [20]Meinhardt H: A model for pattern-formation of hypostome, tentacles, and foot in hydra: how to form structures close to each other, how to form them at a distance. Dev Biol 1993, 157:321-333.
• [21]Smith KM, Gee L, Bode HR: HyAlx, an aristaless-related gene, is involved in tentacle formation in hydra. Development 2000, 127:4743-4752.
• [22]Hobmayer B, Rentzsch F, Kuhn K, Happel CM, Cramer von Laue C, Snyder P, Rothbächer U, Holstein TW: WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature 2000, 407:186-189.
• [23]Philipp I, Aufschnaiter R, Özbek S, Pontasch S, Jenewein M, Watanabe H, Rentzsch F, Holstein TW, Hobmayer B: Wnt/β-Catenin and noncanonical Wnt signaling interact in tissue evagination in the simple eumetazoan Hydra. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:4290-4295.
• [24]Meinhardt H, Klingler M: A model for pattern formation on the shells of molluscs. J Theor Biol 1987, 126:63-89.
• [25]Meinhardt H: The algorithmic beauty of sea shells. 4th edition. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2009.
• [26]Otaki JM: Reversed type of color-pattern modifications of butterfly wings: a physiological mechanism of wing-wide color-pattern determination. J Insect Physiol 2007, 53:526-537.
• [27]Otaki JM: Physiologically induced color-pattern changes in butterfly wings: mechanistic and evolutionary implications. J Insect Physiol 2008, 54:1099-1112.
• [28]Otaki JM: Color-pattern analysis of parafocal elements in butterfly wings. Entomol Sci 2009, 12:74-83.
• [29]Dhungel B, Otaki JM: Local pharmacological effects of tungstate on the color-pattern determination of butterfly wings: a possible relationship between the eyespot and parafocal element. Zool Sci 2009, 26:758-764.
• [30]Otaki JM: Color-pattern modifications of butterfly wings induced by transfusion and oxyanions. J Insect Physiol 1998, 44:1181-1190.
• [31]Mahdi SH, Gima S, Tomita Y, Yamasaki H, Otaki JM: Physiological characterization of the cold-shock-induced humoral factor for wing color-pattern changes in butterflies. J Insect Physiol 2010, 56:1022-1031.
• [32]Mahdi SH, Yamasaki H, Otaki JM: Heat-shock-induced color-pattern changes of the blue pansy butterfly Junonia orithya: physiological and evolutionary implications. J Therm Biol 2011, 36:312-321.
• [33]Nijhout HF: The color patterns of butterflies and moths. Sci Am 1981, 245:104-115.
• [34]Kusaba K, Otaki JM: Positional dependence of scale size and shape in butterfly wings: wing-wide phenotypic coordination of color-pattern elements and background. J Insect Physiol 2009, 55:174-182.
• [35]Takayama E, Yoshida A: Color pattern formation on the wing of a butterfly Pieris rapae. 1. Cautery induced alteration of scale color and delay of arrangement formation. Dev Growth Differ 1997, 39:23-31.
• [36]Takayama E, Motoyama M, Yoshida A: Color pattern formation on the wing of a butterfly Pieris rapae. 2. Color determination and scale development. Dev Growth Differ 1997, 39:485-491.
• [37]Edwards JR, Gibson WG: A model for Ca2+ waves in networks of glial cells incorporating both intercellular and extracellular communication pathways. J Theor Biol 2010, 263:45-58.
• [38]Uriu K, Morishita Y, Iwasa Y: Traveling wave formation in vertebrate segmentation. J Theor Biol 2009, 257:385-396.
• [39]Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M: Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nat Physics 2010, 6:988-992.
• [40]Astumian RD: Thermodynamics and kinetics of a Brownian motor. Science 1997, 276:917-922.