期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Validity and reproducibility of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire for the measurement of the physical activity level in patients after total knee arthroplasty
Nicola A Maffiuletti2  Franco M Impellizzeri2  Nicola C Casartelli1  Sylvain Bolszak2 
[1]INSERM U1093 - Cognition, Action and Sensory Plasticity, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
[2]Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词: Knee;    Arthroplasty;    Questionnaire;    Physical Activity;   
Others  :  1128797
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-46
 received in 2013-05-22, accepted in 2014-02-12,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The need for valid and reproducible questionnaires to routinely assess the physical activity level of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of particular concern in clinical settings. Aims of this study were to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE) questionnaire in TKA patients, with a particular view on gender differences.

Methods

A total of 50 elderly patients (25 women and 25 men aged 70 ± 6 years) following primary unilateral TKA were recruited. The reproducibility was evaluated by administering the PASE questionnaire during two occasions separated by 7 days. The construct (criterion) validity was investigated by comparing the physical activity level reported by patients in the PASE questionnaire to that measured by accelerometry. Reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) for reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) for agreement, while validity was investigated with Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results

Reliability of the PASE total score was acceptable for men (ICC = 0.77) but not for women (ICC = 0.58). Its agreement was low for both men and women, as witnessed by high SEM (32% and 35%, respectively) and SDC (89% and 97%, respectively). Construct validity of the PASE total score was low in both men (r = 0.45) and women (r = 0.06).

Conclusions

The PASE questionnaire has several validity and reproducibility shortcomings, therefore its use is not recommended for the assessment of physical activity level in patients after TKA, particularly in women.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Bolszak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150225082931293.pdf 275KB PDF download
Figure 1. 19KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Kington RS, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, Sowers M, McAlindon T, Spector TD, Poole AR, Yanovski SZ, Ateshian G, Sharma L, Buckwalter JA, Brandt KD, Fries JF: Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2000, 133(8):635-646.
  • [2]Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY: Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(5):963-974.
  • [3]OECD: "Hip and knee replacement" in Health at a Glance 2011: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing; 2011:92-93.
  • [4]Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD: Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(1):57-63.
  • [5]Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, Cross WW 3rd, MacDonald RM, Rutks I: Total knee replacement. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2003, 86:1-8.
  • [6]de Groot IB, Bussmann HJ, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA: Small increase of actual physical activity 6 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(9):2201-2208.
  • [7]Brandes M, Ringling M, Winter C, Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D: Changes in physical activity and health-related quality of life during the first year after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011, 63(3):328-334.
  • [8]Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE, Belcher G, Amstutz HC: Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80(1):54-59.
  • [9]Forsen L, Loland NW, Vuillemin A, Chinapaw MJ, van Poppel MN, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB: Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med 2010, 40(7):601-623.
  • [10]Plasqui G, Westerterp KR: Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity 2007, 15(10):2371-2379.
  • [11]Ainsworth BE: How do I measure physical activity in my patients? Questionnaires and objective methods. Br J Sports Med 2009, 43(1):6-9.
  • [12]Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, van Mechelen W, de Vet HC: Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires: a checklist. Sports Med 2010, 40(7):525-537.
  • [13]Terwee CB, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland SL, de Vet HC, Dekker J: Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19(6):620-633.
  • [14]Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA: The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46(2):153-162.
  • [15]Dinger MK, Oman RF, Taylor EL, Vesely SK, Able J: Stability and convergent validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004, 44(2):186-192.
  • [16]Hagiwara A, Ito N, Sawai K, Kazuma K: Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in Japanese elderly people. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2008, 8(3):143-151.
  • [17]Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL: An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33(6):962-970.
  • [18]Martin KA, Rejeski WJ, Miller ME, James MK, Ettinger WH Jr, Messier SP: Validation of the PASE in older adults with knee pain and physical disability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999, 31(5):627-633.
  • [19]Schuit AJ, Schouten EG, Westerterp KR, Saris WH: Validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method. J Clin Epidemiol 1997, 50(5):541-546.
  • [20]Svege I, Kolle E, Risberg MA: Reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012, 13:26. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Washburn RA, Ficker JL: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): the relationship with activity measured by a portable accelerometer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1999, 39(4):336-340.
  • [22]Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15(12):1833-1840.
  • [23]Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, Greer JL, Vezina J, Whitt-Glover MC, Leon AS: 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(8):1575-1581.
  • [24]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 1996, 13-33.
  • [25]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB: Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000, 25(24):3186-3191.
  • [26]Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40(1):181-188.
  • [27]Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR: Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37(11 Suppl):S531-S543.
  • [28]Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP: Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 167(7):875-881.
  • [29]Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS: Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011, 14(5):411-416.
  • [30]Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS: Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(8):1561-1567.
  • [31]de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM: When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59(10):1033-1039.
  • [32]Tsonga T, Kapetanakis S, Papadopoulos C, Papathanasiou J, Mourgias N, Georgiou N, Fiska A, Kazakos K: Evaluation of improvement in quality of life and physical activity after total knee arthroplasty in greek elderly women. Open Orthop J 2011, 5:343-347.
  • [33]Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Fulton J, Hebert JR: The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 2005, 161(4):389-398.
  • [34]Sims J, Smith F, Duffy A, Hilton S: The vagaries of self-reports of physical activity: a problem revisited and addressed in a study of exercise promotion in the over 65 s in general practice. Fam Pract 1999, 16(2):152-15730.
  • [35]Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL: The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Qual Life Res 2007, 16(5):815-822.
  • [36]Pols MA, Peeters PH, Kemper HC, Grobbee DE: Methodological aspects of physical activity assessment in epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 1998, 14(1):63-70.
  • [37]Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM: Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Med 2001, 31(2):91-100.
  • [38]Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60(1):34-42.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:24次