BMC Medical Education | |
Female residents experiencing medical errors in general internal medicine: a qualitative study | |
David Gachoud1  Gérard Waeber3  Cindy Ottiger Mankaka2  | |
[1] Educational Unit, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 21, BU21/05-246, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;Medical School, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;Service of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland | |
关键词: Qualitative research; Gender; Internal medicine; Medical education; Patient safety; Medical errors; | |
Others : 864980 DOI : 10.1186/1472-6920-14-140 |
|
received in 2013-04-27, accepted in 2014-07-04, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Doctors, especially doctors-in-training such as residents, make errors. They have to face the consequences even though today’s approach to errors emphasizes systemic factors. Doctors’ individual characteristics play a role in how medical errors are experienced and dealt with. The role of gender has previously been examined in a few quantitative studies that have yielded conflicting results. In the present study, we sought to qualitatively explore the experience of female residents with respect to medical errors. In particular, we explored the coping mechanisms displayed after an error. This study took place in the internal medicine department of a Swiss university hospital.
Methods
Within a phenomenological framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight female residents in general internal medicine. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed.
Results
Seven main themes emerged from the interviews: (1) A perception that there is an insufficient culture of safety and error; (2) The perceived main causes of errors, which included fatigue, work overload, inadequate level of competences in relation to assigned tasks, and dysfunctional communication; (3) Negative feelings in response to errors, which included different forms of psychological distress; (4) Variable attitudes of the hierarchy toward residents involved in an error; (5) Talking about the error, as the core coping mechanism; (6) Defensive and constructive attitudes toward one’s own errors; and (7) Gender-specific experiences in relation to errors. Such experiences consisted in (a) perceptions that male residents were more confident and therefore less affected by errors than their female counterparts and (b) perceptions that sexist attitudes among male supervisors can occur and worsen an already painful experience.
Conclusions
This study offers an in-depth account of how female residents specifically experience and cope with medical errors. Our interviews with female residents convey the sense that gender possibly influences the experience with errors, including the kind of coping mechanisms displayed. However, we acknowledge that the lack of a direct comparison between female and male participants represents a limitation while aiming to explore the role of gender.
【 授权许可】
2014 Mankaka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140726045913447.pdf | 211KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Kroll L, Singleton A, Collier J, Rees Jones I: Learning not to take it seriously: junior doctors’ accounts of error. Med Educ 2008, 42:982-990.
- [2]Wu AW, Folkman S, McPhee SJ, Lo B: Do house officers learn from their mistakes? JAMA 1991, 265:2089-2094.
- [3]Engel KG, Rosenthal M, Sutcliffe KM: Residents’ responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change. Acad Med 2006, 8:86-93.
- [4]Hobgood C, Hevia A, Tamayo-Sarver JH, Weiner B, Riviello R: The influence of the causes and contexts of medical errors on emergency medicine residents’ responses to their errors: an exploration. Acad Med 2005, 80:758-764.
- [5]West CP: Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 2006, 296:1071-1078.
- [6]Mizrahi T: Managing medical mistakes: ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training. Soc Sci Med 1984, 19:135-146.
- [7]Jagsi R, Kitch BT, Weinstein DF, Camp EG, Hutter M, Weiss JS: Residents report on adverse events and their causes. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165:2607-2613.
- [8]Varjavand N, Bachegowda LS, Gracely E, Novack DH: Changes in intern attitudes toward medical error and disclosure. Med Educ 2012, 46:668-677.
- [9]Waterman AD, Garbutt J, Hazel E, Dunagan WC, Levinson W, Fraser VJ, Gallgher TH: The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007, 33:467-476.
- [10]Aasland OG, F∅rde R: Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:13-17.
- [11]Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Bauer G, Häemmig O, Knecht M, Klaghofer R: The impact of gender and parenthood on physicians’ careers‾professional and personal situation seven years after graduation. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:40.
- [12]Lazarus RS: Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom Med 1993, 55:234-247.
- [13]Schwappach DL, Boluarte TA: The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organisational accountability. Swiss Med Wkly 2009, 139:9-15.
- [14]Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc; 1984.
- [15]Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges B: Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ 2008, 337:a949. doi:10.1136/bmj.a949
- [16]Smith D: Husserl. London: Routledge; 2007.
- [17]Kvale S, Brinkmann S: Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousank Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996.
- [18]Kuzel AJ: Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In Doing Qualitative Research. Edited by Crabtree F, Miller WL. Thousank Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:33-45.
- [19]Lincoln YS, Guba GE: Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
- [20]Dead by mistake, Hearst Corporation. 2013. [http://www.hearst.com/newsroom/hearst-national-investigation-finds-americans-are-continuing-to-die-in-staggering-numbers-from-preventable-medical-injuries webcite]
- [21]Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS: To Err is Human: Building A Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
- [22]Wears RL, Wu AW: Dealing with failure: the aftermath of errors and adverse events. Ann Emerg Med 2002, 39:344-346.
- [23]Babaria P, Bernheim S, Nunez-Smith M: Gender and the pre-clinical experiences of female medical students: a taxonomy. Med Educ 2011, 45:249-260.
- [24]Babaria P, Abedin S, Berg D, Nunez-Smith M: ≪ I’m too used to it ≫: a longitudinal qualitative study of third year female medical students’ experiences of gendered encounters in medical education. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:1013-1020.
- [25]Witz A: Patriarchy and professions: the gendered politics of occupational closure. Sociology 1990, 24:675-690.
- [26]Goldberg RM, Kuhn G, Andrew LB, Thomas HA Jr: Coping with medical mistakes and errors in judgment. Ann Emerg Med 2002, 39:287-292.
- [27]Hilfiker D: Facing our mistakes. N Engl J Med 1984, 310:118-122.
- [28]Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS: Sex differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2002, 6:2-30.
- [29]Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Dodge KL: Gender differences in coping with stress: when stressor and appraisals do not differ. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1994, 20:421-430.
- [30]Matud MP: Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Pers Individ Differ 2004, 37:1401-1415.
- [31]O’Connor E, Coates HM, Yardley IE, Wu AW: Disclosure of patient safety incidents: a comprehensive review. Int J Qual Health Care 2010, 22:371-379.