Real-time ultrasound elastography in 180 axillary lymph nodes: elasticity distribution in healthy lymph nodes and prediction of breast cancer metastases

BMC Medical Imaging

Peter Hillemanns³  Michael Cassel⁴  Werner Schmidt¹  Jennifer Dupont²  Sebastian Wojcinski³ 

[1] University Hospital of Saarland, Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Homburg/Saar, Germany;Main-Taunus-Kreis Hospital, Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bad Soden, Germany;Hannover Medical School, Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, OE 6410, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover 30625, Germany;University of Potsdam, Center for Sports Medicine, Recreational and High Performance Sports, Potsdam, Germany

关键词: Lymph node metastases;    HI-RTE;    Elasticity imaging;    Cancer detection;    Real-time tissue elastography;    Sonoelastography;    Axillary lymph nodes;    Breast ultrasound;   

Others  :  1091553
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2342-12-35

 received in 2012-09-09, accepted in 2012-12-18,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

To determine the general appearance of normal axillary lymph nodes (LNs) in real-time tissue sonoelastography and to explore the method′s potential value in the prediction of LN metastases.

Methods

Axillary LNs in healthy probands (n=165) and metastatic LNs in breast cancer patients (n=15) were examined with palpation, B-mode ultrasound, Doppler and sonoelastography (assessment of the elasticity of the cortex and the medulla). The elasticity distributions were compared and sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) were calculated. In an exploratory analysis, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated based upon the estimated prevalence of LN metastases in different risk groups.

Results

In the elastogram, the LN cortex was significantly harder than the medulla in both healthy (p=0.004) and metastatic LNs (p=0.005). Comparing healthy and metastatic LNs, there was no difference in the elasticity distribution of the medulla (p=0.281), but we found a significantly harder cortex in metastatic LNs (p=0.006). The SE of clinical examination, B-mode ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound and sonoelastography was revealed to be 13.3%, 40.0%, 14.3% and 60.0%, respectively, and SP was 88.4%, 96.8%, 95.6% and 79.6%, respectively. The highest SE was achieved by the disjunctive combination of B-mode and elastographic features (cortex >3mm in B-mode or blue cortex in the elastogram, SE=73.3%). The highest SP was achieved by the conjunctive combination of B-mode ultrasound and elastography (cortex >3mm in B-mode and blue cortex in the elastogram, SP=99.3%).

Conclusions

Sonoelastography is a feasible method to visualize the elasticity distribution of LNs. Moreover, sonoelastography is capable of detecting elasticity differences between the cortex and medulla, and between metastatic and healthy LNs. Therefore, sonoelastography yields additional information about axillary LN status and can improve the PPV, although this method is still experimental.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Wojcinski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P: The sentinel node in breast cancer–a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998, 339(14):941-6.
• [2]Kuehn T, Bembenek A, Decker T, Munz DL, Sautter-Bihl ML, Untch M, Wallwiener D: Consensus committee of the german society of, senology: a concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance. Cancer 2005, 103(3):451-61.
• [3]Veronesi U, Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Pigatto F, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Paganelli G, Sciascia V, Viale G: Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an indicator for axillary dissection in early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2001, 37(4):454-8.
• [4]Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, Costa A, de Cicco C, Geraghty JG, Luini A, Sacchini V, Veronesi P: Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 1997, 349(9069):1864-7.
• [5]Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MB, Hansen NM, Kelley MC, Ye W, Glass EC, Turner RR: Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18(13):2553-9.
• [6]Esen G, Gurses B, Yilmaz MH, Ilvan S, Ulus S, Celik V, Farahmand M, Calay OO: Gray scale and power doppler US in the preoperative evaluation of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes. Eur Radiol 2005, 15(6):1215-23.
• [7][http://www.nccn.org] webciteThe NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology^TMBREAST CANCER (V.2.2012). © 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc;
• [8]Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Giuliano AE: American college of surgeons oncology, group: surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the american college of surgeons oncology group trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25(24):3657-63.
• [9]Kocak Z, Overgaard J: Risk factors of arm lymphedema in breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2000, 39(3):389-92.
• [10]Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M: Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011, 305(6):569-75.
• [11]Giuliano AE, Han SH: Local and regional control in breast cancer: role of sentinel node biopsy. Adv Surg 2011, 45:101-16.
• [12]Nori J, Vanzi E, Bazzocchi M, Bufalini FN, Distante V, Branconi F, Susini T: Role of axillary ultrasound examination in the selection of breast cancer patients for sentinel node biopsy. Am J Surg 2007, 193(1):16-20.
• [13]Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P, Lopez F, Alonso I, Cortes J: Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186(5):1342-8.
• [14]March DE, Wechsler RJ, Kurtz AB, Rosenberg AL, Needleman L: CT-pathologic correlation of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991, 15(3):440-4.
• [15]Bonnema J, van Geel AN, van Ooijen B, Mali SP, Tjiam SL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Schmitz PI, Wiggers T: Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy for detection of nonpalpable axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients: new diagnostic method. World J Surg 1997, 21(3):270-4.
• [16]Lam WW, Yang WT, Chan YL, Stewart IE, Metreweli C, King W: Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma by technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy, ultrasound and conventional mammography. Eur J Nucl Med 1996, 23(5):498-503.
• [17]Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin MW, Taylor I: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997, 169(2):417-24.
• [18]Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A: Prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1997, 203(2):317-21.
• [19]Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K: In vitro high-resolution helical CT of small axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: correlation of CT and histology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001, 176(4):1069-74.
• [20]Tateishi T, Machi J, Feleppa EJ, Oishi R, Furumoto N, McCarthy LJ, Yanagihara E, Uchida S, Noritomi T, Shirouzu K: In vitro B-mode ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 1999, 18(5):349-56.
• [21]Hahn M, Roessner L, Krainick-Strobel U, Gruber IV, Kramer B, Gall C, Siegmann KC, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO: [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing]. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012, 33(3):270-4.
• [22]Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F: Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS(R)-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2010, 31(5):484-91.
• [23]Schulz-Wendtland R, Bock K, Aichinger U, de Waal J, Bader W, Albert US, Duda VF: [Ultrasound examination of the breast with 7.5 MHz and 13 MHz-transducers: scope for improving diagnostic accuracy in complementary breast diagnostics?]. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2005, 26(3):209-15.
• [24]Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F: [Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions]. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2011, 32(4):400-5.
• [25]Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T: Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol 2010, 17(5):558-63.
• [26]Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA: Ultrasonographic differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: a meta-analytic comparison of elasticity and BIRADS scoring. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 133(1):23-35.
• [27]Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Hiraoka M, Insana MF, Brill AB, Saga T, Togashi K: Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography–initial experience. Radiology 2007, 243(1):258-67.
• [28]Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K: Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191(2):604-10.
• [29]Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH, Rasalkar DD, King AD, Ahuja AT: Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010, 36(12):1990-7.
• [30]Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q: Ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. Acad Radiol 2010, 17(7):849-55.
• [31]Janssen J, Dietrich CF, Will U, Greiner L: Endosonographic elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. Endoscopy 2007, 39(11):952-7.
• [32]Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G, Delpero JR: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy 2006, 38(4):344-8.
• [33]Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B, Christian P, Fabrice C, Benjamin E, Genevieve M, Paolo A, Pierre D, Robert Y, Walter S, Hanz S, Carl S, Christoph D, Pierre E, Jean-Luc VL, Jacques D, Peter V, Andrian S: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15(13):1587-93.
• [34]Aoyagi S, Izumi K, Hata H, Kawasaki H, Shimizu H: Usefulness of real-time tissue elastography for detecting lymph-node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009, 34(8):e744-7.
• [35]Choi JJ, Kang BJ, Kim SH, Lee JH, Jeong SH, Yim HW, Song BJ, Jung SS: Role of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2011, 30(4):429-36.
• [36]Taylor K, O′Keeffe S, Britton PD, Wallis MG, Treece GM, Housden J, Parashar D, Bond S, Sinnatamby R: Ultrasound elastography as an adjuvant to conventional ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of axillary lymph nodes in suspected breast cancer: a pilot study. Clin Radiol 2011, 66(11):1064-71.
• [37][http://www.degum.de/Mehrstufenkonzept_Mammasonogra.634.0.html] webciteDEGUM (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin). Mehrstufenkonzept Mammasonographie;
• [38]Frey H, Ignee A, Dietrich CF: Elastographie, ein neues bildgebendes verfahren. Endosk heute 2006, 19:117-120. 117
• [39]Stavros AT: Breast ultrasound. 1st edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
• [40]Ueno E, Tohno E, Soeda S, Asaoka Y, Itoh K, Bamber JC, Blaszczyk M, Davey J, McKinna JA: Dynamic tests in real-time breast echography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988, 14(Suppl 1):53-7.
• [41]Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Brauer K, Jordan L, Purdie C, McLean D, Baker L, Vinnicombe S, Thompson A: Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Br J Cancer 2012, 107(2):224-9.
• [42]Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, Takahashi H, Yoneda M, Suda T, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E: Performance of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat 2012, 19(2):e212-9.
• [43]Newcombe RG: Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998, 17(8):873-90.
• [44]Tan LG, Tan YY, Heng D, Chan MY: Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with early breast cancer in singapore. Singapore Med J 2005, 46(12):693-7.
• [45]Chan GS, Ho GH, Yeo AW, Wong CY: Correlation between breast tumour size and level of axillary lymph node involvement. Asian J Surg 2005, 28(2):97-9.
• [46]UICC: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
• [47]Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R, Boyages J: Is there a role for axillary dissection for patients with operable breast cancer in this era of conservatism? ANZ J Surg 2002, 72(11):786-792.
• [48]Yip CH, Taib NA, Tan GH, Ng KL, Yoong BK, Choo WY: Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: is there a role for minimal axillary surgery? World J Surg 2009, 33(1):54-57.
• [49]Wojcinski S, Cassel M, Farrokh A, Soliman AA, Hille U, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F, Hillemanns P: Variations in the elasticity of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle determined by real-time sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med 2012, 31(1):63-72.
• [50]Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CR, Rubin E: BI-RADS: Ultrasound. In In In Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - Breast Imaging Atlas. Edited by D′Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2002.
• [51]Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T: Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006, 239(2):341-50.
• [52]Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H, Gorunescu F: Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2006, 27(6):535-42.