Chromatin structure is distinct between coding and non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms

BMC Molecular Biology

Lingjie Liu²  Kun Luo¹  Jinchen Zhai²  Hongde Liu² 

[1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Evidence-Based Medicine Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China

[2]State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

关键词: Mutation;    DNA methylation;    Histone modification;    Nucleosome;    Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP);   

Others  :  1090246
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2199-15-22

 received in 2014-01-30, accepted in 2014-09-26,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Previous studies suggested that nucleosomes are enriched with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in humans and that the occurrence of mutations is closely associated with CpG dinucleotides. We aimed to determine if the chromatin organization is genomic locus specific around SNPs, and if newly occurring mutations are associated with SNPs.

Results

Here, we classified SNPs according their loci and investigated chromatin organization in both CD4⁺ T cell and lymphoblastoid cell in humans. We calculated the SNP frequency around somatic mutations. The results indicated that nucleosome occupancy is different around SNPs sites in different genomic loci. Coding SNPs are mainly enriched at nucleosomes and associated with repressed histone modifications (HMs) and DNA methylation. Contrastingly, intron SNPs occur in nucleosome-depleted regions and lack HMs. Interestingly, risk-associated non-coding SNPs are also enriched at nucleosomes with HMs but associated with low GC-content and low DNA methylation level. The base-transversion allele frequency is significantly low in coding-synonymous SNPs (P < 10^-11). Another finding is that at the -1 and +1 positions relative to the somatic mutation sites, the SNP frequency was significantly higher (P < 3.2 × 10^-5).

Conclusions

The results suggested chromatin structure is different around coding SNPs and non-coding SNPs. New mutations tend to occur at the -1 and +1 position immediately near the SNPs.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sasaki S, Mello CC, Shimada A, Nakatani Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa M, Matsushima K, Gu SG, Kasahara M, Ahsan B, Sasaki A, Saito T, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Kohara Y, Takeda H, Fire A, Morishita S: Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites. Science 2009, 323:401-404.
• [2]Higasa K, Hayashi K: Periodicity of SNP distribution around transcription start sites. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:66. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Tolstorukov MY, Volfovsky N, Stephens RM, Park PJ: Impact of chromatin structure on sequence variability in the human genome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:510-515.
• [4]Jiang C, Pugh BF: Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:161-172.
• [5]Hongde LX, Sun : Analysis of Nucleosome Positioning in The Vicinity of Sites of Nucleotide Polymorphism in Human Genome. Progress Biochem Biophysics 2011, 38:5.
• [6]Schork NJ, Fallin D, Lanchbury JS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms and the future of genetic epidemiology. Clin Genet 2000, 58:250-264.
• [7]Fryxell KJ, Moon WJ: CpG mutation rates in the human genome are highly dependent on local GC content. Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22:650-658.
• [8]Chen X, Chen Z, Chen H, Su Z, Yang J, Lin F, Shi S, He X: Nucleosomes suppress spontaneous mutations base-specifically in eukaryotes. Science 2012, 335:1235-1238.
• [9]Prendergast JG, Semple CA: Widespread signatures of recent selection linked to nucleosome positioning in the human lineage. Genome Res 2011, 21:1777-1787.
• [10]Prendergast JG, Campbell H, Gilbert N, Dunlop MG, Bickmore WA, Semple CA: Chromatin structure and evolution in the human genome. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7:72. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Peng W, Zhang MQ, Zhao K: Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 2008, 40:897-903.
• [12]Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Humphray SJ, Greenman CD, Varela I, Lin ML, Ordonez GR, Bignell GR, Ye K, Alipaz J, Bauer MJ, Beare D, Butler A, Carter RJ, Chen L, Cox AJ, Edkins S, Kokko-Gonzales PI, Gormley NA, Grocock RJ, Haudenschild CD, Hims MM, James T, Jia M, Kingsbury Z, Leroy C, Marshall J, Menzies A, et al.: A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 2010, 463:191-196.
• [13]Langley SA, Karpen GH, Langley CH: Nucleosomes shape DNA polymorphism and divergence. PLoS Genet 2014, 10(7):e1004457.
• [14]Bandele OJ, Wang X, Campbell MR, Pittman GS, Bell DA: Human single-nucleotide polymorphisms alter p53 sequence-specific binding at gene regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:178-189.
• [15]Ameur A, Rada-Iglesias A, Komorowski J, Wadelius C: Identification of candidate regulatory SNPs by combination of transcription-factor-binding site prediction, SNP genotyping and haploChIP. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:e85.
• [16]Gaffney DJ, McVicker G, Pai AA, Fondufe-Mittendorf YN, Lewellen N, Michelini K, Widom J, Gilad Y, Pritchard JK: Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1003036.
• [17]Supek F, Minana B, Valcarcel J, Gabaldon T, Lehner B: Synonymous mutations frequently act as driver mutations in human cancers. Cell 2014, 156:1324-1335.
• [18]Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA: Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:9362-9367.
• [19]Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K: High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 2007, 129:823-837.
• [20]Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, Wang Z, Wei G, Zhao K: Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 2008, 132:887-898.
• [21]Han J, Park SG, Bae JB, Choi J, Lyu JM, Park SH, Kim HS, Kim YJ, Kim S, Kim TY: The characteristics of genome-wide DNA methylation in naive CD4+ T cells of patients with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012, 422:157-163.
• [22]Wang Z, Zang C, Cui K, Schones DE, Barski A, Peng W, Zhao K: Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 2009, 138:1019-1031.
• [23]Kundaje A, Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S, Libbrecht M, Smith CL, Raha D, Winters EE, Johnson SM, Snyder M, Batzoglou S, Sidow A: Ubiquitous heterogeneity and asymmetry of the chromatin environment at regulatory elements. Genome Res 2012, 22:1735-1747.
• [24]Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, Zhang X, Wang L, Issner R, Coyne M, Ku M, Durham T, Kellis M, Bernstein BE: Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 2011, 473:43-49.
• [25]Liu H, Luo K, Wen H, Ma X, Xie J, Sun X: Quantitative analysis reveals increased histone modifications and a broad nucleosome-free region bound by histone acetylases in highly expressed genes in human CD4(+) T cells. Genomics 2013, 101:113-119.