期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
Maria Victoria Zunzunegui2  Elodie Samson1  Slim Haddad2  Ellen E Freeman1  Samia Djemâa Mechakra-Tahiri2 
[1]Centre de Recherche de Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
[2]Centre de Research de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
关键词: Gender-related development index;    Human development index;    Mobility;    Inequality;    Gender;   
Others  :  1163377
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-598
 received in 2012-03-26, accepted in 2012-07-24,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Several studies have demonstrated that women have greater mobility disability than men. The goals of this research were: 1) to assess the gender gap in mobility difficulty in 70 countries; 2) to determine whether the gender gap is explained by sociodemographic and health factors; 3) to determine whether the gender gap differs across 6 regions of the world with different degrees of gender equality according to United Nations data.

Methods

Population-based data were used from the World Health Survey (WHS) conducted in 70 countries throughout the world. 276,647 adults aged 18 years and over were recruited from 6 world regions. Mobility was measured by asking the level of difficulty people had moving around in the last 30 days and then creating a dichotomous measure (no difficulty, difficulty). The human development index and the gender-related development index for each country were obtained from the United Nations Development Program website. Poisson regression with Taylor series linearized variance estimation was used.

Results

Women were more likely than men to report mobility difficulty (38% versus 27%, P < 0.0001). The age-adjusted prevalence rate ratio for female gender was 1.35 (95% CI 1.31–1.38). The addition of education, marital status, and urban versus rural setting reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.30 (95% CI 1.26–1.33). The addition of the presence of back pain, arthritis, angina, depressive symptoms, and cognitive difficulties further reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.12 (95% CI 1.09–1.15). There was statistical interaction on the multiplicative scale between female gender and region (P < 0.01). The Eastern Mediterranean region, which had the greatest loss of human development due to gender inequality, showed the largest gender gap in mobility difficulty, while the Western Pacific region, with the smallest loss of human development due to gender inequality, had the smallest gender gap in mobility difficulty.

Conclusions

These are the first world-wide data to examine the gender gap in mobility. Differences in chronic diseases are the main reasons for this gender gap. The gender gap seems to be greater in regions with the largest loss of human development due to gender inequality.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Mechakra-Tahiri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413095838954.pdf 341KB PDF download
Figure 1. 66KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB: Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995, 332(9):556-561.
  • [2]Ostir GV, Markides KS, Black SA, Goodwin JS: Lower body functioning as a predictor of subsequent disability among older Mexican Americans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998, 53(6):M491-M495.
  • [3]Peek MK, Ottenbacher KJ, Markides KS, Ostir GV: Examining the disablement process among older Mexican American adults. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57(3):413-425.
  • [4]Lubitz J, Cai L, Kramarow E, Lentzner H: Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003, 349(11):1048-1055.
  • [5]Newman AB, Brach JS: Gender gap in longevity and disability in older persons. Epidemiol Rev 2001, 23(2):343-350.
  • [6]Leveille SG, Penninx BW, Melzer D, Izmirlian G, Guralnik JM: Sex differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: the dynamics of incidence, recovery, and mortality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2000, 55(1):S41-S50.
  • [7]Leveille SG, Resnick HE, Balfour J: Gender differences in disability: evidence and underlying reasons. Aging (Milano) 2000, 12(2):106-112.
  • [8]Merrill SS, Seeman TE, Kasl SV, Berkman LF: Gender differences in the comparison of self-reported disability and performance measures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997, 52(1):M19-M26.
  • [9]Whitson HE, Landerman LR, Newman AB, Fried LP, Pieper CF, Cohen HJ: Chronic medical conditions and the sex-based disparity in disability: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010, 65(12):1325-1331.
  • [10]Petrea RE, Beiser AS, Seshadri S, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Wolf PA: Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study. Stroke 2009, 40(4):1032-1037.
  • [11]Murtagh KN, Hubert HB: Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Public Health 2004, 94(8):1406-1411.
  • [12]Yount KM, Hoddinott J, Stein AD: Disability and self-rated health among older women and men in rural Guatemala: the role of obesity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71(8):1418-1427.
  • [13]Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado BE, Beland F, Vissandjee B: Explaining health differences between men and women in later life: a cross-city comparison in Latin America and the Caribbean. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(2):235-242.
  • [14]Kaneda T, Zimmer Z, Fang X, Tang Z: Gender Differences in Functional Health and Mortality Among the Chinese Elderly: Testing an Exposure Versus Vulnerability Hypothesis. Res Aging 2009, 31(3):361-388.
  • [15]Ahacic K, Parker MG, Thorslund M: Mobility limitations in the Swedish population from 1968 to 1992: age, gender and social class differences. Aging (Milano) 2000, 12(3):190-198.
  • [16]Miszkurka M, Zunzunegui MV, Langlois EV, Freeman EE, Kouanda S, Haddad S: Gender differences in mobility disability during young, middle and older age in West African adults. Glob, Public Health; 2011.
  • [17]Tay T, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Lindley R, Wang JJ: Eye care service utilization in older people seeking aged care. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006, 34(2):141-145.
  • [18]Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B: Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 2007, 370(9590):851-858.
  • [19]Palagyi A, Ramke J, du Toit R, Brian G: Eye care in Timor-Leste: a population-based study of utilization and barriers. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008, 36(1):47-53.
  • [20]Schuler D: The uses and misuses of the gender-related development index and the gender empowerment measure: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 2007, 7(2):161-181.
  • [21]Yount KM, Hoddinott J, Stein AD: Disability and self-rated health among older women and men in rural Guatemala: the role of obesity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71(8):1418-1427.
  • [22]United, Nations: Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases: Report of the Secretary-General. , ; 2011.
  • [23]Alvarado BE, Guerra RO, Zunzunegui MV: Gender differences in lower extremity function in Latin American elders: seeking explanations from a life-course perspective. J Aging Health 2007, 19(6):1004-1024.
  • [24]Guerra RO, Alvarado BE, Zunzunegui MV: Life course, gender and ethnic inequalities in functional disability in a Brazilian urban elderly population. Aging Clin Exp Res 2008, 20(1):53-61.
  • [25]Yount KM, Agree EM: Differences in disability among older women and men in Egypt and Tunisia. Demography 2005, 42(1):169-187.
  • [26]Zeki Al Hazzouri A, Mehio Sibai A, Chaaya M, Mahfoud Z, Yount KM: Gender differences in physical disability among older adults in underprivileged communities in Lebanon. J Aging Health 2011, 23(2):367-382.
  • [27]Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R: Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002, 50(5):889-896.
  • [28]Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, 39(2):142-148.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:23次