Validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of Actinobacillus suis

BMC Research Notes

Janet I MacInnes¹  Adina R Bujold¹ 

[1] Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Ontario, Canada

关键词: Pasteurellaceae;    Reference gene;    qPCR;   

Others  :  1139910
DOI  :  10.1186/s13104-015-1045-8

 received in 2014-11-06, accepted in 2015-03-04,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Quantitative real-time PCR is a valuable tool for evaluating bacterial gene expression. However, in order to make best use of this method, endogenous reference genes for expression data normalisation must first be identified by carefully validating the stability of expression under experimental conditions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate eight reference genes of the opportunistic swine pathogen, Actinobacillus suis, grown in aerobic cultures with (Epinephrine) or without (Aerobic) epinephrine in the growth medium and in anoxic static cultures (Anoxic), and sampled during exponential and stationary phases.

Results

Using the RefFinder tool, expression data were analysed to determine whether comprehensive stability rankings of selected reference genes varied with experimental design. When comparing Aerobic and Epinephrine cultures by growth phase, pyk and rpoB were both among the most stably expressed genes, but when analysing both growth phases together, only pyk remained in the top three rankings. When comparing Aerobic and Anoxic samples, proS ranked among the most stable genes in exponential and stationary phase data sets as well as in combined rankings. When analysing the Aerobic, Epinephrine, and Anoxic samples together, only gyrA ranked consistently among the top three most stably expressed genes during exponential and stationary growth as well as in combined rankings; the rho gene ranked as least stably expressed gene in this data set.

Conclusions

Reference gene stability should be carefully assessed with the design of the experiment in mind. In this study, even the commonly used reference gene 16S rRNA demonstrated large variability in stability depending on the conditions studied and how the data were analysed. As previously suggested, the best approach may be to use a geometric mean of multiple genes to normalise qPCR results. As researchers continue to validate reference genes for various organisms in multiple growth conditions and sampling time points, it may be possible to make informed predictions as to which genes may be most suitable to validate for a given experimental design, but in the meantime, the reference genes used to normalise qPCR data should be selected with caution.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Bujold and MacInnes; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kernaghan S, Bujold AR, MacInnes JI: The microbiome of the soft palate of swine. Anim Health Res Rev 2012, 13:110-20.
• [2]MacInnes JI, Desrosiers R: Agents of the “suis-ide diseases” of swine: Actinobacillus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, and Streptococcus suis. Can J Vet Res 1999, 63:83-9.
• [3]Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A: Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 2005, 6:279-84.
• [4]Derveaux S, Vandesompele J, Hellemans J: How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods 2010, 50:227-30.
• [5]Dheda K, Huggett JF, Chang JS, Kim LU, Bustin SA, Johnson MA, et al.: The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene for real-time reverse transcription PCR data normalization. Anal Biochem 2005, 344:141-3.
• [6]Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A: Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 313:856-62.
• [7]Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al.: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002, 3:RESEARCH0034. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Klitgaard Nielsen K, Boye M: Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of expression stability of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae housekeeping genes during in vitro growth under iron-depleted conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:2949-54.
• [9]Ren W, Liu S, Chen S, Zhang F, Li N, Yin J, et al.: Dietary L-glutamine supplementation increases Pasteurella multocida burden and the expression of its major virulence factors in mice. Amino Acids 2013, 45:947-55.
• [10]MacInnes JI, Mackinnon J, Bujold AR, Ziebell K, Kropinski AM, Nash JH: Complete genome sequence of Actinobacillus suis H91-0380, a virulent serotype O2 strain. J Bacteriol 2012, 194:6686-7.
• [11]Van Ostaaijen J, Frey J, Rosendal S, MacInnes JI: Actinobacillus suis strains isolated from healthy and diseased swine are clonal and carry apxICABDvar. suis and apxIICAvar. suis toxin genes. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:1131-7.
• [12]Deslandes V, Denicourt M, Girard C, Harel J, Nash JH, Jacques M: Transcriptional profiling of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during the acute phase of a natural infection in pigs. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:98. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Thornton B, Basu C: Real-time PCR (qPCR) primer design using free online software. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2011, 39:145-54.
• [14]Bustin SA, Benes V, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR - a perspective. J Mol Endocrinol 2005, 34:597-601.
• [15]Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, Merckx R, Van Eldere J: Quantification of expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis housekeeping genes with Taqman quantitative PCR during in vitro growth and under different conditions. J Bacteriol 2001, 183:7094-101.
• [16]Hildyard JC, Wells DJ: Identification and validation of quantitative PCR reference genes suitable for normalizing expression in normal and dystrophic cell culture models of myogenesis. PLoS Curr 2014, 6:6.
• [17]Gangaiah D, Zhang X, Fortney KR, Baker B, Liu Y, Munson RS Jr, et al.: Activation of CpxRA in Haemophilus ducreyi primarily inhibits the expression of its targets, including major virulence determinants. J Bacteriol 2013, 195:3486-502.
• [18]Labandeira-Rey M, Mock JR, Hansen EJ: Regulation of expression of the Haemophilus ducreyi LspB and LspA2 proteins by CpxR. Infect Immun 2009, 77:3402-11.
• [19]Tremblay YD, Deslandes V, Jacques M: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae genes expression in biofilms cultured under static conditions and in a drip-flow apparatus. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:364. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Richardson J, Craighead JC, Cao SL, Handfield M: Concurrence between the gene expression pattern of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in localized aggressive periodontitis and in human epithelial cells. J Med Microbiol 2005, 54:497-504.
• [21]Longo PL, Nunes AC, Umeda JE, Mayer MP: Gene expression and phenotypic traits of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in response to environmental changes. J Periodontal Res 2013, 48:766-72.
• [22]Sathiamoorthy S, Shewen PE, Hodgins DC, Lo RY: In vivo gene expression in Mannheimia haemolytica A1 during a time-course trial in the bovine host. Vet Microbiol 2012, 158:163-71.
• [23]Metcalf D, Sharif S, Weese JS: Evaluation of candidate reference genes in Clostridium difficile for gene expression normalization. Anaerobe 2010, 16:439-43.