Effectiveness of a peer-led HIV prevention intervention in secondary schools in Rwanda: results from a non-randomized controlled trial

BMC Public Health

Marleen Temmerman⁴  Ronan Van Rossem¹  Kristien Roelens²  Wim Delva³  Roxanne Beauclair³  Kristien Michielsen⁴ 

[1] Department of Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Korte Meer 3, 9000, Gent, Belgium;Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan, 185P3, 9000, Gent, Belgium;South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Stellenbosch, South Africa;International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan, 185 6K4, 9000, Gent, Belgium

关键词: Rwanda;    Young people;    Effectiveness;    HIV prevention;    Peer education;   

Others  :  1163162
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-729

 received in 2012-03-21, accepted in 2012-08-27,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

While the HIV epidemic is levelling off in sub-Saharan Africa, it remains at an unacceptably high level. Young people aged 15-24 years remain particularly vulnerable, resulting in a regional HIV prevalence of 1.4% in young men and 3.3% in young women. This study assesses the effectiveness of a peer-led HIV prevention intervention in secondary schools in Rwanda on young people’s sexual behavior, HIV knowledge and attitudes.

Methods

In a non-randomized longitudinal controlled trial, fourteen schools were selected in two neighboring districts in Rwanda Bugesera (intervention) and Rwamagana (control). Students (n = 1950) in eight intervention and six control schools participated in three surveys (baseline, six and twelve months in the intervention). Analysis was done using linear and logistic regression using generalized estimation equations adjusted for propensity score.

Results

The overall retention rate was 72%. Time trends in sexual risk behavior (being sexually active, sex in last six months, condom use at last sex) were not significantly different in students from intervention and control schools, nor was the intervention associated with increased knowledge, perceived severity or perceived susceptibility. It did significantly reduce reported stigma.

Conclusions

Analyzing this and other interventions, we identified several reasons for the observed limited effectiveness of peer education: 1) intervention activities (spreading information) are not tuned to objectives (changing behavior); 2) young people prefer receiving HIV information from other sources than peers; 3) outcome indicators are not adequate and the context of the relationship in which sex occurs and the context in which sex occurs is ignored. Effectiveness of peer education may increase through integration in holistic interventions and redefining peer educators’ role as focal points for sensitization and referral to experts and services. Finally, we argue that a narrow focus on sexual risks will never significantly turn the tide.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Michielsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

【 参考文献 】

• [1]UNAIDS: UNAIDS World AIDS Day Report 2011. How to get to zero: faster. smarter. better. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2011.
• [2]Marston C, King E: Factors that shape young people's behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet 2006, 368(9547):1581-1586.
• [3]United Nations: United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS. New York: United Nations; 2001.
• [4]United Nations: United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations; 2000.
• [5]Ministry of Education, Technology and Scientific Research, Republic of Rwanda: Education Sector Policy. Kigali; 2003.
• [6]Ministry of Education, Republic of Rwanda: MINEDUC Strategic Issues Paper 2008-2012. Kigali: Republic of Rwanda; 2007.
• [7]UN Interagency Group on Young People's Health: Peer Education Training of Trainers Manual. New York: UNFPA/UNICEF; 2003.
• [8]Bayingana C: Rwanda situation of the Reproductive Health and Sexual Education targeting adolescents and youth. Kigali: Rwanda Paediatric Conference on HIV and AIDS; Nov 2010.
• [9]FHI-YouthNet: Youth Peer Education in Reproductive Health and HIV/AIDS: Progress, Process, and Programming for the Future. Arlington, USA: FHI; 2006.
• [10]Save the Children: Effective Peer Education: working with children and young people on sexual and reproductive health. London: Save the Chilren; 2004.
• [11]YouthNet: Standards for Peer Education Programmes. New York: UNFPA; 2005.
• [12]Celis H: Evaluation of a Peer Education based HIV/AIDS Prevention Project with Rwandan Youth. Ghent: Ghent University; 2010.
• [13]Demidenko E: Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction. Stat Med 2008, 27(1):36-46.
• [14]Bausell RB, Li Y: Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical, and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
• [15]Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Routledge Academic; 1988.
• [16]World Health Organization: Ethical Issues. [ http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/hrp/guidelines_adolescent.html, accessed 10/12/2008 webcite]
• [17]Society for Adolescent Medicine: Guidelines for Adolescent Health Research. J Adolesc Health 2003, 33:410-415.
• [18]American Sociological Association: Code of Ethics and Policies and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Washington: American Sociological Association; 1999.
• [19]Weithorn L: Children’s capacities to decide about participation in research. IRB 1983, 5:1-5.
• [20]Susman E, Dorn L, Fletcher J: Participation in biomedical research: the consent process as viewed by children, adolescents, young adults, and physicians. J Pediatr 1992, 121(4):547-552.
• [21]Zuch M, Mason-Jones AJ, Mathews C, Henley L: Changes to the law on consent in South Africa: implications for school-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012., 12(3)
• [22]Oakes MJ, Johnson PJ: Propensity score matching for social epidemiology. In Methods in social epidemiology. Edited by Oakes MJ, Kaufman JS. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
• [23]Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB: The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 1983, 70(1):41-55.
• [24]Lux KM, Petosa R: Using the Health Belief Model to Predict Safer Sex Intentions of Incarcerated Youth. Health Educ Q 1994, 21(4):487-497.
• [25]Senn TE, Carey MP, Vanable PA, Coury-Doniger P, Urban M: Sexual partner concurrency among STI clinic patients with a steady partner: correlates and associations with condom use. Sex Transm Infect 2009, 85(5):343-347.
• [26]Njue C, Voeten HACM, Remes P: Porn video shows, local brew, and transactional sex: HIV risk among youth in Kisumu, Kenya. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:635. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Kenyon C, Zondo S, Badri M: Determinants of self-perceived HIV risk in young south Africans engaged in concurrent sexual relationship. Afr J Reprod Health 2010, 14(3):171-181.
• [28]Winter L: The Role of Sexual Self-Concept in the Use of Contraceptives. Fam Plann Perspect 1988, 20(3):123-127.
• [29]DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Rose E, Sales JM, Crosby RA: Evaluation of an HIV/STD Sexual Risk-Reduction Intervention for Pregnant African American Adolescents Attending a Prenatal Clinic in an Urban Public Hospital: preliminary Evidence of Efficacy. J Pediatr Adol Gynec 2010, 23(1):32-38.
• [30]Salazar LF, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby RA, Harrington K, Davies S, Hook EW, Oh MK: Self-concept and adolescents' refusal of unprotected sex: a test of mediating mechanisms among African American girls. Prev Sci 2004, 5(3):137-149.
• [31]Dilorio C, Resnicow K, Thomas S, Wang DQT, Dudley WN, Van Marter DF, Lipana J: Keepin' it REAL!: program description and results of baseline assessment. Health Educ Behav 2002, 29(1):104-123.
• [32]Kim CR, Free C: Recent evaluations of the peer-led approach in adolescent sexual health education: a systematic review. Perspect Sex Repro H 2008, 40(3):144-151.
• [33]Agha S: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a peer sexual health intervention among secondary-school students in Zambia. AIDS Educ Prev 2002, 14(4):269-281.
• [34]Borgia P, Marinacci C, Schifano P, Perucci CA: Is peer education the best approach for HIV prevention in schools? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Adolescent Health 2005, 36(6):508-516.
• [35]Mason-Jones AJ, Mathews C, Flisher AJ: Can Peer Education Make a Difference? Evaluation of a South African Adolescent Peer Education Program to Promote Sexual and Reproductive Health. AIDS Behav 2011, 15(8):1605-1611.
• [36]Fritz K, McFarland W, Wyrod R, Chasakara C, Makumbe K, Chirowodza A, Mashoko C, Kellogg T, Woelk G: Evaluation of a Peer Network-Based Sexual Risk Reduction Intervention for Men in Beer Halls in Zimbabwe: results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. AIDS Behav 2011, 15(8):1732-1744.
• [37]Delva W, Michielsen K, Meulders B, Groeninck S, Wasonga E, Ajwang P, Temmerman M, Vanreusel B: HIV prevention through sport: the case of the Mathare Youth Sport Association in Kenya. Aids CarePsychol SocioMed Aspects of Aids/Hiv 2010, 22(8):1012-1020.
• [38]Simoni JM, Nelson KM, Franks JC, Yard SS, Lehavot K: Are Peer Interventions for HIV Efficacious? A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav 2011, 15(8):1589-1595.
• [39]Agha S, Van Rossem R: Impact of a school-based peer sexual health intervention on normative beliefs, risk perceptions, and sexual behavior of Zambian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2004, 34(5):441-452.
• [40]Doyle AM, Ross DA, Maganja K, Baisley K, Masesa C, Andreasen A, Plummer ML, Obasi AIN, Weiss HA, Kapiga S, et al.: Long-Term Biological and Behavioural Impact of an Adolescent Sexual Health Intervention in Tanzania: follow-up Survey of the Community-Based MEMA kwa Vijana Trial. PLoS Medicine 2010, 7(6):e1000287.
• [41]Speizer IS, Tambashe BO, Tegang SP: An Evaluation of the "Entre Nous Jeunes" Peer-educator Program for Adolescents in Cameroon. Stud Fam Plann 2001, 31(4):339-351.
• [42]van der Maas F, Otte WM: Evaluation of HIV/AIDS secondary school peer education in rural Nigeria. Health Educ Res 2009, 24(4):547-557.
• [43]Ross DA, Dick B, Ferguson J: Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people. a systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. In Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
• [44]Mavedzenge SMN, Doyle AM, Ross DA: HIV Prevention in Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Systematic Review. J Adolescent Health 2011, 49(6):568-586.
• [45]Brieger WR, Delano GE, Lane CG, Oladepo O, Oyediran KA: West African Youth Initiative: outcome of a reproductive health education program. J Adolesc Health 2001, 29(6):436-446.
• [46]Obasi AI, Cleophas B, Ross DA, Chima KL, Mmassy G, Gavyole A, Plummer ML, Makokha M, Mujaya B, Todd J, et al.: Rationale and design of the MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual and reproductive health intervention in Mwanza Region, Tanzania. Aids CarePsychol SocioMed Aspects of Aids/Hiv 2006, 18(4):311-322.
• [47]Harvey B, Stuart J, Swan T: Evaluation of a drama-in-education programme to increase AIDS awareness in South African high schools: a randomized community intervention trial. Intl J STD AIDS 2000, 11(2):105-111.
• [48]Fitzgerald AM, Stanton BF, Terreri N, Shipena H, Li X, Kahihuata J, Ricardo IB, Galbraith JS, De Jaeger AM: Use of Western-based HIV risk-reduction interventions targeting adolescents in an African setting. J Adolesc Health 1999, 25(1):52-61.
• [49]Visser MJ: HIV/AIDS prevention through peer education and support in secondary schools in South Africa. J Soc Asp HIV/AIDS 2007, 4(3):678-694.
• [50]Kirby D, Short L, Collins J, Rugg D, Kolbe L, Howard M, Miller B, Sonenstein F, Zabin LS: School-based programs to reduce sexual risk behaviors: a review of effectiveness. Public Health Rep 1994, 109(3):339-360.
• [51]James S, Reddy SP, Taylor M, Jinabhai C: Young people, HIV/AIDS/STIs and sexuality in South Africa: the gap between awareness and behaviour. Acta Paediatr 2004, 93(2):264-269.
• [52]Odu OO, Asekun-Olarinmoye EO, Bamidele JO, Egbewale BE, Amusan OA, Olowu AO: Knowledge, attitudes to HIV/AIDS and sexual behaviour of students in a tertiary institution in south-western Nigeria. Eur J Contracep Repr 2008, 13(1):90-96.
• [53]Bronfenbrenner U: The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design: cambridge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.
• [54]Guttmacher Institute: Learning from adolescents to prevent HIV and unintended pregnancy. In In Brief. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2007.
• [55]Van Rossem R, Meekers D: Perceived social approval and condom use with casual partners among youth in urban Cameroon. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:632. BioMed Central Full Text
• [56]McKay A, Holowaty P: Sexual health education: a study of adolescents' opinions, self-perceived needs, and current and preferred sources of information. Can J Hum Sex 1997, 6:29-38.
• [57]HeadsUp: Sex Education - Do you get enough?. London: HeadsUp; 2010.
• [58]Planken M, Boer H: Effects of a 10-minutes peer education protocol to reduce binge drinking among adolescents during holidays. J Alcohol Drug Educ 2010.
• [59]Ward JD, Hunter G, Power R: Peer education as a means of drug prevention and education among young people. Health Educ J 1997, 56:251-263.
• [60]Price N, Knibbs S: How effective is peer education in addressing young people's sexual and reproductive health needs in developing countries? Child Soc 2009, 23(4):291-302.
• [61]Shiner M, Newburn T: Young people, drugs and peer education: an evaluation of the youth awareness programme. London: Central Drugs Prevention Unit; 1996.
• [62]Wellings F, Nanchahal K, Macdowall W, McManus S, Erens B, Mercer CH, Johnson AM, Copas AJ, Korovessis C, Fenton FA, et al.: Sexual behaviour in Britain: early heterosexual experience. Lancet 2001, 358(9296):1843-1850.