Clinical benefit and improvement of activity level after reconstruction surgery of Charcot feet using external fixation: 24-months results of 292 feet

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Hans H Wetz³  Jan Siewe²  Nani Osada¹  Inna Frohne³  Tymo Budny³  Ulrich Illgner³ 

[1] Institut for clinical mathematics, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany;Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;Clinic for Technical Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany

关键词: External fixator;    Diabetes mellitus;    Reconstructive surgery;    Charcot neuropathy;    Charcot feet;   

Others  :  1091601
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-392

 received in 2014-03-14, accepted in 2014-11-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Reconstruction of Charcot feet remains a surgical challenge. The goal of this study was to investigate safety and clinical benefit from reconstruction of Charcot feet using an external fixator. There is limited valid data regarding long-term outcomes for Charcot foot procedures.

Methods

In a retrospective study, 292 Charcot feet (282 patients) undergoing reconstructive procedures in our clinic from 1996–2010 were included (93 female, 189 male, mean age 57.9 years). Average follow-up was 24.1 months. Exclusion criteria were previous major amputation on the same side. All patients underwent surgery using a Hoffmann II external fixator for six to eight weeks with offloading. The fixator was then removed, and a customized AFO with full weight bearing was applied for another 11 months. After one year, patients received customized orthopedic shoes.

Results

Initial amputations were avoided. Patient activity improved significantly by more than 1 level (SD 0.67, p < .001) according to the Hoffer activity score for lower limb amputees. The most common minor complication was persistent or recurrent ulceration in 67 feet (23%). Secondary amputation (after failure of external fixation) was required in only 12 patients (6.2%). Orthopedic shoes were used by approximately 34% of patients 18 months after surgery.

Conclusions

Reconstructive surgery of Charcot feet using external fixation is a safe and economically feasible procedure. Activity levels improved significantly by more than 1 level (p < 0.01), severe complications were rare, and secondary amputation was required in only 12 patients (6.2%) of a high-risk patient population. Use of an external fixator offers the advantage that all extraneous material is removed after six weeks; thus, there is no risk of broken screws or plates and the associated potential complications.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Illgner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Charcot JM: Sur quelques arthropathies qui paraissent depender d’une lesion du cerveau ou de la moele epinere. Arch Des Norm et Path 1868, 1:161-171.
• [2]Rogers LC, Frykberg RG, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ, Edmonds M, Van GH, Hartemann A, Game F, Jeffcoate W, Jirkovska A, Jude E, Morbach S, Morrison WB, Pinzur M, Pitocco D, Sanders L, Wukich DK, Uccioli L: The Charcot foot in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011, 34:2123-2129.
• [3]Jeffcoate WJ, Game FL, Cavanagh PR: The role of proinflammatory cytokines in the cause of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (acute Charcot foot) in diabetes. Lancet 2005, 366:2058-2061.
• [4]Wetz HH: Diabetisch-neuropathische Osteoarthropathie: behandlungsergebnisse und orthopädisch-chirurgische Aspekte. Dt Ärztebl 1995, 43:A-2701-A-2705. German
• [5]Lankisch M1, Füth R, Schotes D, Rose B, Lapp H, Rathmann W, Haastert B, Gülker H, Scherbaum WA, Martin S: High prevalence of undiagnosed impaired glucose regulation and diabetes mellitus in patients scheduled for an elective coronary angiography. Clin Res Cardiol 2006, 95:80-87.
• [6]World Health Organizationhttp://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/Updated webcite Nov 2014. Accessed Nov 2014
• [7]Illgner U, Uekoetter A, Runge S, Wetz HH: Infections with pseudomonas aeruginosa in charcot arthropathy of the foot. Foot Ankle Int 2013, 34:234.
• [8]Shibuya N, Humphers JM, Fluhman BL, Jupiter D: Factors associated with nonunion, delayed union, and malunion in foot and ankle surgery in diabetic patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 2013, 52:207-211.
• [9]Wukich DK, McMillen RL, Lowery NJ, Frykberg RG: Surgical site infections after foot and ankle surgery. a comparison of patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011, 34:2211.
• [10]Sammarco VJ, Chevillet J: The role of internal fixation in surgery of the Charcot foot and the evolution of “super- construct” techniques. Curr Orthop Pract 2010, 21(3):233-239.
• [11]Grant WP, Garcia-Lavin SE, Sabo RT, Tam HS, Jerlin E: A retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive charcot diabetic salvage reconstructions. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009, 48(1):30-38.
• [12]Facaros Z, Ramanujam C, Stapleton JJ: Combined circular external fixation and open reduction internal fixation with pro-syndesmotic screws for repair of a diabetic ankle fracture. Diabet Foot Ankle 2010, 1:5554.
• [13]Gil J, Schiff AP, Pinzur MS: Cost comparison: limb salvage versus amputation in diabetic patients with charcot foot. Foot Ankle Int 2013, 34(8):1097-1099.
• [14]Pinzur MS: Neutral ring fixation for high-risk nonplantigrade Charcot midfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2007, 28(9):961-966.
• [15]Pinzur M: Surgical versus accommodative treatment for Charcot arthropathy of the midfoot. Foot Ankle Int 2004, 25(8):545-549.
• [16]Pinzur MS, Gil J, Belmares J: Treatment of osteomyelitis in charcot foot with single-stage resection of infection, correction of deformity, and maintenance with ring fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2012, 33(12):1069-74. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.1069
• [17]Grear BJ, Alexander R, Brodsky JW: Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2013, 34:1541. originally published online 30 July 2013 doi:10.1177/1071100713500490
• [18]Bariteau JT, Tenenbaum S, Rabinovich A, Brodsky JW: Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle in patients with idiopathic neuropathy. Foot Ankle Int 2014. Aug 7. [Epub ahead of print]