期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Multicentre RCT and economic evaluation of a psychological intervention together with a leaflet to reduce risk behaviour amongst men who have sex with men (MSM) prescribed post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV following sexual exposure (PEPSE): A protocol
Martin Fisher4  Paul Benn1  Alex Pollard2  Helen Smith2  Alec Miners5  Charles Abraham3  Carrie Llewellyn2 
[1] Camden Provider Services at Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK;Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK;Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry, Exeter, UK;Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK;London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
关键词: Intervention;    Post-exposure-prophylaxis;    Motivational interviewing;    HIV;    Sexual behaviour;   
Others  :  1175420
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-12-70
 received in 2012-01-13, accepted in 2012-03-22,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following sexual exposure to HIV has been recommended as a method of preventing HIV infection in the UK. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are the group most affected by HIV in the UK and their sexual risk taking behaviour is reported to be increasing. One-to-one behavioural interventions, such as motivational interviewing (MI) have been recommended to reduce HIV in high risk groups. The Information, Motivation and Behavioral skills (IMB) model has been shown to provide a good basis for understanding and predicting HIV-relevant health behaviour and health behaviour change, however the IMB has yet to be applied to PEP after risky sexual exposure. The primary aim of this trial is to examine the impact of MI augmented with information provision and behavioural skills building (informed by the IMB Model), over and above usual care, on risky sexual behaviour in MSM prescribed PEP after potential sexual exposure. A secondary aim of this research is to examine the impact of the intervention on adherence to PEP. This study will also provide estimates of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Methods

A manualised parallel group randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation will be conducted. The primary outcome is the proportion of risky sexual practices. Secondary outcomes include: i) Levels of adherence to PEP treatment; ii) Number of subsequent courses of PEP; iii) Levels of motivation to avoid risky sexual behaviours; iv) Levels of HIV risk-reduction information/knowledge; v) Levels of risk reduction behavioural skills; vi) Diagnosis of anal gonorrhoea, Chlamydia and/or HIV. 250 participants will be asked to self-complete a questionnaire at four time points during the study (at 0,3,6,12 months). The intervention will consist of a two-session, fixed duration, telephone administered augmented MI intervention based on the IMB model. A newly developed treatment manual will guide the selection of persuasive communication strategies as appropriate for each participant and will be based on underlying change mechanisms specified by the IMB theoretical framework. Information provision and skills building will also be included in the intervention package through the use of information leaflets and tailored action plans. Fidelity of intervention delivery will be assessed.

Discussion

The results from this NIHR funded study will identify whether it is appropriate and cost-effective to intervene using one-to-one telephone calls with MSM seeking PEP. If the intervention is effective, further work will be needed on training staff to deliver the intervention competently.

Trial registration numbers

UKCRN ID:11436; ISRCTN00746242.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Llewellyn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150428031041709.pdf 209KB PDF download
Figure 2. 52KB Image download
Figure 1. 13KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Department of Health: National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV. London: DOH; 2001.
  • [2]Department of Health: Moving forward: progress and priorities -working together for high quality sexual health: Government response to the Independent Advisory Group's review of the Sexual Health and HIV Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2009.
  • [3]Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV: Building on progress. Enhancing the response to HIV in England. London: Department of Health; 2009.
  • [4]Fisher M, Benn P, Evans B, Pozniak A, Jones M, MacLean S, Davidson O, Summerside J, Hawkins D: Clinical Effectiveness Group (British Association for Sexual Health and HIV). United Kingdom Guidelines for the use of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV following sexual exposure. Int J STD AIDS 2006, 17:81-92.
  • [5]Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, Heptonstall J, Ippolito G, Lot F, McKibben PS, Bell DM: A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure to HIV-infected blood: clinical and public health implications. New Engl J Med 1997, 337(21):1485-1490.
  • [6]Katz M, Gerberding J: Postexposure treatment of people exposed to the HIV virus through sexual contact or injection-drug use. New Engl J Med 1997, 336:1097-1100.
  • [7]Otten RA, Smith DK, Adams DR, Pullium JK, Jackson E, Kim CN, Jaffe H, Janssen R, Butera S, Folks TM: Efficacy of postexposure prophylaxis after intravaginal exposure of pig-tailed macaques to a human-derived retrovirus (human immunodeficiency virus type 2). J Virol 2000, 74(20):9771-9775.
  • [8]Schecter M, do Lago RF, Mendelsohn AB, Moreira RI, Moulton LH, the Praça Onze Study Team: Behavioral impact, acceptability, and HIV incidence among homosexual men with access to postexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV. J Acq Immun Def Synd 2004, 35(5):519-525.
  • [9]Dodds C, Hammond G, Keogh P, Hickson F, Weatherburn P: PEP talk. Awareness of, access to post-exposure prophylaxis among Gay & Bisexual men in the UK. London: Sigma Research; 2006.
  • [10]Kahn JO, Martin JN, Rowland ME, Bamberger JD, Chesney M, Chambers D, et al.: Feasibility of Postexposure Prophylaxis (PEP) against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection after sexual or injection drug use exposure: The San Francisco PEP Study. J Infect Dis 2001, 183(5):707-714.
  • [11]The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI surveillance: Mapping the issues. HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom. London: Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections; 2005.
  • [12]Dodds JP, Mercey DE, Perry JV, Johnson AM: Increasing risk behaviour and high levels of undiagnosed HIV infection in a community sample of homosexual men. Sex Transm Infect 2004, 80:451-454.
  • [13]Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G: Trends in sexual behaviour among London homosexual men 1998-2003: implications for HIV prevention and sexual health promotion. Sex Transm Infect 2004, 80:451-454.
  • [14]Herbst JH, Beeker C, Mathew A, et al.: The effectiveness of individual-, group-, and community-level HIV behavioral risk-reduction interventions for adult men who have sex with men: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med 2007, 32(4S):S38-S67.
  • [15]Global HIV Prevention Working Group: Behavior Change and HIV Prevention: (Re) Considerations for the 21st Century. Global HIV Prevention Working Group 2008.
  • [16]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: One to one interventions to reduce the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV, and to reduce the rate of under 18 conceptions, especially among vulnerable and at risk groups. NICE public health intervention guidance 3. London: NICE; 2007.
  • [17]Medical Foundation for AIDS & Sexual Health: Recommended standards for sexual health services. United Kingdom. 2005.
  • [18]Rietmeijer C: Risk reduction counselling for prevention of sexually transmitted infections: how it works and how to make it work. Sex Transm Infect 2007, 83:2-9.
  • [19]Waldo CR, Stall RD, Coates TJ: Is offering post-exposure prevention for sexual exposures to HIV related to sexual risk behaviour in gay men? AIDS 2000, 14:1035-1039.
  • [20]Miller W, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing, preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: The Guildford Press; 1991.
  • [21]Rubak S, Sandboek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B: Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit J Gen Pract 2005, 55:305-312.
  • [22]Cosio D, Heckman TG, Anderson T, Heckman BD, Garske J, McCarthy J: Telephone-administered motivational interviewing to reduce risky sexual behavior in HIV-infected rural persons: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Sex Transm Dis 2010, 37:140-146.
  • [23]Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Cornman DH, Amico RK, Bryan A, Friedland GH: Clinician-delivered intervention during routine clinical care reduces unprotected sexual behaviour among HIV-infected patients. J Acq Immun Def Synd 2006, 41:44-52.
  • [24]Fisher JD, Fisher WA: The information-motivation-behavioral skills model. In Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. Edited by DiClemente R, Crosby R, Kegler M. San Fransisco: Jossy-Bass; 2002:40-70.
  • [25]Fisher JD, Fisher WA: Changing AIDS risk behaviour. Psychol Bull 1992, 111:455-474.
  • [26]Fisher JD, Cornman DH, Norton WE, Fisher WA: Involving behavioral scientists, health care providers, and HIV-infected patients as collaborators in theory-based HIV prevention and antiretroviral adherence interventions. J Acq Iimmun Def Synd 2006, 43(Supplement 1):S10-S17.
  • [27]Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, et al.: An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol 2006, 25:462-473.
  • [28]Starace F, Mayer KH, Amico KR, et al.: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Health Psychol 2006, 25:153-162.
  • [29]Miller WR: The Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) Manual, version 1. [http://casaa.unm.edu/download/misc1.pdf] webcite 2000. 15-4-2010
  • [30]Abraham C, Michie S: A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 2008, 27:379-387.
  • [31]Abraham C: Mapping change mechanisms and behaviour change techniques: A systematic approach to promoting behaviour change through text. In Writing Health Communication: An Evidence-Based Guide for Professionals. Edited by Abraham C, Kools M. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011.
  • [32]British Psychological Society Health Psychology Team: Improving Health: Changing Behaviour, NHS Health Trainer Handbook. London: Department of Health; 2008.
  • [33]Morisky D, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward H: Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens 2008, 10(5):348-354.
  • [34]Misovich S, Fisher W, Fisher J: A measure of AIDS prevention information, motivation, behavioral skills, and behavior. In Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Edited by Davis C, Yarber W, Bauserman R, et al. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE; 1998:328-337.
  • [35]Shepherd J, Kavanagh J, Picot J, Cooper K, Harden A, Barnett-Page E, Jones J, Clegg A, Hartwell D, Frampton GK, Price A: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural interventions for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in young people aged 13-19: a systematic review and economic evaluation. HTA 2010., 14(7)
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:190次 浏览次数:24次