期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Unintended pregnancy and subsequent use of modern contraceptive among slum and non-slum women in Nairobi, Kenya
Rhoune Ochako2  Teresa Saliku3  Chimaraoke Izugbara1  Jean Christophe Fotso4 
[1] African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya;Population Services International, Nairobi, Kenya;Twaweza East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya;P.O. Box 34323, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya
关键词: Kenya;    Urban poor;    Contraceptive use;    Unplanned pregnancy;    Unintended pregnancy;   
Others  :  840662
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-14-224
 received in 2013-08-05, accepted in 2014-07-03,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

In spite of major gains in contraceptive prevalence over the last few decades, many women in most parts of the developing world who would like to delay or avoid pregnancy do not use any method of contraception. This paper seeks to: a) examine whether experiencing an unintended pregnancy is associated with future use of contraception controlling for a number factors including poverty at the household and community levels; and b) investigate the mechanisms through which experiencing an unintended pregnancy leads to uptake of contraception.

Methods

Quantitative and qualitative data from a cross-sectional research project conducted in 2009/10 in two slum settlements and two non-slum settings of Nairobi, Kenya are used. The quantitative component of the project was based on a random sample of 1,259 women aged 15–49 years. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of unintended pregnancy on future contraceptive use. The qualitative component of the project successfully interviewed a total of 80 women randomly selected from survey participants who had reported having at least one unintended pregnancy.

Results

Women whose last pregnancy was unintended were more likely to be using a modern method of contraception, compared to their peers whose last pregnancy was intended, especially among the wealthier group as shown in the interaction model. Among poor women, unintended pregnancy was not associated with subsequent use of contraception. The qualitative investigation with women who had an unplanned pregnancy reveals that experiencing an unintended pregnancy seems to have served as a “wake-up call”, resulting in greater attention to personal risks, including increased interest in pregnancy prevention. For some women, unintended pregnancy was a consequence of strong opposition by their partners to family planning, while others reported they started using contraceptives following their unintended pregnancy, but discontinued after experiencing side effects.

Conclusion

This study provides quantitative and qualitative evidence that women who have had an unintended pregnancy are “ready for change”. Family planning programs may use the contacts with antenatal, delivery and post-delivery care system as an opportunity to identify women whose pregnancy is unplanned, and target them with information and services.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Fotso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140716080656669.pdf 226KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Singh S, Darroch JE: Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services Estimates for 2012. New York: Guttmacher Institute & UNFPA; 2012.
  • [2]Tsui OA, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke EA: Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev 2010, 32:152-174.
  • [3]Zuehlke E: Reducing Unintended Pregnancy and Unsafe Abortion through Contraceptive Use. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau (PRB); 2009.
  • [4]Hubacher D, Mavranezouli I, McGinn E: Unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: magnitude of the problem and potential role of contraceptive implants to alleviate it. Contraception 2008, 78:73-78.
  • [5]Moreland S, Talbird S: Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: The Contribution of Fulfilling the Unmet Need for Family Planning. Washington, DC: Futures Group & U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); 2006.
  • [6]Smith R, Ashford L, Gribble J, Clifton D: Family Planning Saves Lives. 4th edition. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2009.
  • [7]Ashford L: Unmet Need for Family Planning: Recent Trends and Their Implications for Programs. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau; MEASURE Communication; 2003.
  • [8]Magadi MA: Unplanned childbearing in Kenya: the socio-demographic correlates and the extent of repeatability among women. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:167-178.
  • [9]Shah I, Ahman E: Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences and challenges. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009, 31:1149-1158.
  • [10]Ross JA, Winfrey WL: Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001, 27:20-27.
  • [11]Kuroki LM, Allsworth JE, Redding CA, Blume JD, Peipert JF: Is a previous unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199(517):e1-e7.
  • [12]Matteson KA, Peipert JF, Allsworth J, Phipps MG, Redding CA: Unplanned pregnancy: does past experience influence the use of a contraceptive method? Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107:121-127.
  • [13]Orcutt HK, Cooper ML: The effects of pregnancy experience on contraceptive practice. J Youth Adolesc 1997, 26:763-778.
  • [14]National Council for Population and Development (NCPD), Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS): Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 1993. Calverton, Maryland: NCPD, CBS, and MI; 1994.
  • [15]Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro: Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro; 2010.
  • [16]National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development (NCAPD): Gaining Ground: Recouping the Lost Decade for Family Planning. Nairobi, Kenya: National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development (NCAPD); 2010.
  • [17]Gebreselassie H, Gallo MF, Monyo A, Johnson R: The magnitude of abortion complications in Kenya. BJOG 2005, 112:1229-1235.
  • [18]Agwanda A, Khasakhala A, Kimani M: Assessment of Family Planning services in Kenya: Evidence from the 2004 Kenya Service Provision Assessment Survey. Kenya. Calverton, MD: Macro International; 2009. Working Papers No. 4, 2009
  • [19]Aloo-Obunga C: Country Analysis of Family Planning and HIV/AIDS: Kenya. Washington, DC, USA: Policy Project; 2003.
  • [20]Zulu E, Dodoo FN, Ezeh A: Sexual risk-taking in the slums of Nairobi, Kenya, 1993–98. Popul Stud 2002, 56:311-323.
  • [21]United Nations (UN): World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division Population; 2010.
  • [22]Ezeh A, Kodzi I, Emina J: Reaching the urban poor with family planning services. Stud Fam Plann 2010, 41:109-116.
  • [23]Fotso JC: Child Health inequities in developing countries: differences across urban and rural areas. Int J Equity Health 2006, 5(9):1-10.
  • [24]Kyobutungi C, Ziraba A, Ezeh A, Yé Y: The burden of disease profile of residents of Nairobi’s slums: results from a Demographic Surveillance System. Popul Health Metr 2008, 6:1. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]Izugbara C, Ochako R, Izugbara C: Gender scripts and unwanted pregnancy among urban Kenyan women. Cult Health Sex 2011, 13:1031-1045.
  • [26]Ikamari L, Izugbara L, Ochako R: Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy among women in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13:69. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [27]Filmer D, Pritchett L: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in States of India. Demography 2001, 38:115-132.
  • [28]Kleman LV: The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Matern Child Health J 2000, 4:155-162.
  • [29]Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R, Hirsch JS, Schieve L, Unintended Pregnancy Working group: The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003, 35:94-101.
  • [30]D’Angelo DV, Gilbert BC, Rocha RW, Santelli JS, Herold JM: Differences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have live births. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004, 36:192-197.
  • [31]Fotso JC, Kizito P, Guilkey D, Lumumba V, Wamukoya M: Levels, Trends and Differentials in Family Planning and Reproductive Health Indicators in Urban Kenya. Chapel Hill, NC: Measurement, Learning and Evaluation (MLE) Project & National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development (NCAPD) [Kenya]; 2011.
  • [32]Weinstein ND: Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychol Bull 1989, 105:31-50.
  • [33]Ringheim K, Gribble J, Foreman M: Integrating Family Planning and Maternal and Child Health Care: Saving Lives, Money and Time. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau (PRB); 2011.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:32次