期刊论文详细信息
BMC Clinical Pharmacology
Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol
Michael Eddleston1  Nicholas Bateman1  Ian L Megson4  David J Webb1  Jane Goddard5  Neal Uren3  Ivor Mackenzie4  Neil R Johnston1  Adrian Thompson1  Julie Donnelly2  Jane Crowe2  Lesley Briody2  Sam Donaldson2  Frances Paterson2  Sharon Cameron2  Euan A Sandilands1 
[1] Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK;Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Department of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Free Radical Research Facility, University of the Highlands & Islands, Inverness, UK;Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
关键词: contrast media;    kidney;    prevention;    acetylcysteine;    Contrast-induced nephropathy;   
Others  :  860802
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6904-12-3
 received in 2012-01-04, accepted in 2012-02-03,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common complication of contrast administration in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Its pathophysiology is not well understood; similarly the role of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine is unclear. Randomized controlled trials to date have been conducted without detailed knowledge of the effect of acetylcysteine on renal function. We are conducting a detailed mechanistic study of acetylcysteine on normal and impaired kidneys, both with and without contrast. This information would guide the choice of dose, route, and appropriate outcome measure for future clinical trials in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Methods/Design

We designed a 4-part study. We have set up randomised controlled cross-over studies to assess the effect of intravenous (50 mg/kg/hr for 2 hrs before contrast exposure, then 20 mg/kg/hr for 5 hrs) or oral acetylcysteine (1200 mg twice daily for 2 days, starting the day before contrast exposure) on renal function in normal and diseased kidneys, and normal kidneys exposed to contrast. We have also set up a parallel-group randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine on patients with chronic kidney disease stage III undergoing elective coronary angiography. The primary outcome is change in renal blood flow; secondary outcomes include change in glomerular filtration rate, tubular function, urinary proteins, and oxidative balance.

Discussion

Contrast-induced nephropathy represents a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality. Over the last ten years, acetylcysteine has been administered prior to contrast to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Randomized controlled trials, however, have not reliably demonstrated renoprotection; a recent large randomized controlled trial assessing a dose of oral acetylcysteine selected without mechanistic insight did not reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Our study should reveal the mechanism of effect of acetylcysteine on renal function and identify an appropriate route for future dose response studies and in time randomized controlled trials.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00558142; EudraCT: 2006-003509-18.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Sandilands et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140724200321825.pdf 334KB PDF download
13KB Image download
30KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Parfrey P: The clinical epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005, 28(Suppl 2):S3-11.
  • [2]McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, et al.: Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:5K-13K.
  • [3]Mehran R, Caixeta A: N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy. To give, or not to give: that is the question. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010, 63:9-11.
  • [4]Stacul F: Reducing the risks for contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005, 28(Suppl 2):S12-S18.
  • [5]Rich MW, Crecelius CA: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical course of acute renal insufficiency after cardiac catheterization in patients 70 years of age or older. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 1990, 150:1237-1242.
  • [6]Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S: Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004, 183:1673-1689.
  • [7]Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S: Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 39:930-936.
  • [8]Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Gangas G, Lansky AJ, Kent KM, et al.: The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 36:1542-1548.
  • [9]Murphy SW, Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS: Contrast nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000, 11:177-182.
  • [10]Baker CS, Wragg A, Kumar S, De Palma R, Baker LR, Knight CJ: A rapid protocol for the prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction: the RAPPID study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:2114-2118.
  • [11]Stacul F, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, McCullough PA, et al.: Strategies to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:59K-77K.
  • [12]Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Renal Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Angiography: Main Results From the Randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Trial (ACT) Circulation 2011, 124:1250-1259.
  • [13]Briguori C, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Airoldi F, Valgimigli M, Sangiorgi GM, et al.: Renal Insufficiency After Contrast Media Administration Trial II (REMEDIAL II): RenalGuard System in High-Risk Patients for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Circulation 2011.
  • [14]Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, Holleman JH, Roush TS, Kowalchuk GJ, et al.: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 291:2328-2334.
  • [15]Erdogan A, Davidson CJ: Recent clinical trials of iodixanol. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003, 4(Suppl 5):S43-S50.
  • [16]Sandler CM: Contrast-agent-induced acute renal dysfunction--is iodixanol the answer? N Engl J Med 2003, 348:551-553.
  • [17]Solomon R: The role of osmolality in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review of angiographic contrast media in high risk patients. Kidney Int 2005, 68:2256-2263.
  • [18]Briguori C, Colombo A, Airoldi F, Morici N, Sangiorgi GM, Violante A, et al.: Nephrotoxicity of low-osmolality versus iso-osmolality contrast agents: impact of N-acetylcysteine. Kidney Int 2005, 68:2250-2255.
  • [19]Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, Strasser R, Willenbrock R, Berg KJ: Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:491-499.
  • [20]Bartholomew BA, Harjai KJ, Dukkipati S, Boura JA, Yerkey MW, Glazier S, et al.: Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification. Am J Cardiol 2004, 93:1515-1519.
  • [21]Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, et al.: A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:1393-1399.
  • [22]Rudnick MR, Davidson C, Laskey W, Stafford JL, Sherwin PF: Nephrotoxicity of iodixanol versus ioversol in patients with chronic kidney disease: the Visipaque Angiography/Interventions with Laboratory Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (VALOR) Trial. Am Heart J 2008, 156:776-782.
  • [23]Bagshaw SM, McAlister FA, Manns BJ, Ghali WA: Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:161-166.
  • [24]Eddleston M, Goddard J, Bateman N: N-acetylcysteine for contrast nephropathy: more clinical science is required. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:1668-1669.
  • [25]Sunman W, Hughes AD, Sever PS: Anaphylactoid response to intravenous acetylcysteine. Lancet 1992, 339:1231-1232.
  • [26]Manjunath G, Sarnak MJ, Levey AS: Estimating the glomerular filtration rate. Dos and don'ts for assessing kidney function. Postgrad Med 2001, 110:55-62.
  • [27]Hoffmann U, Fischereder M, Kruger B, Drobnik W, Kramer BK: The value of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast agent-induced nephropathy seems questionable. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15:407-410.
  • [28]Jakobsen JA: Renal effects of iodixanol in healthy volunteers and patients with severe renal failure. Acta Radiol Suppl 1995, 399:191-195.
  • [29]Nelson L, Lewin N, Howland M, Hoffman R, Goldfrank L, Flomenbaum N: Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 9th edition. 2010.
  • [30]Shalansky SJ, Vu T, Pate GE, Levin A, Humphries KH, Webb JG: N-acetylcysteine for prevention of radiographic contrast material-induced nephropathy: is the intravenous route best? Pharmacotherapy 2005, 25:1095-1103.
  • [31]Prescott LF, Donovan JW, Jarvie DR, Proudfoot AT: The disposition and kinetics of intravenous N-acetylcysteine in patients with paracetamol overdosage. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989, 37:501-506.
  • [32]Sandilands EA, Bateman DN: Adverse reactions associated with acetylcysteine. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009, 47:81-88.
  • [33]GE Healthcare: Visipaque 320: summary of product characteristics. Accessed 13 Jan 06
  • [34]Sweetman SCE: Martindale: the extra pharmacopoeia. 34th edition. 2005.
  • [35]Nyman U, Almen T, Aspelin P, Hellstrom M, Kristiansson M, Sterner G: Contrast-medium-Induced nephropathy correlated to the ratio between dose in gram iodine and estimated GFR in ml/min. Acta Radiol 2005, 46:830-842.
  • [36]Schnurr E, Lahme W, Kuppers H: Measurement of renal clearance of inulin and PAH in the steady state without urine collection. Clin Nephrol 1980, 13:26-29.
  • [37]Stevens LA, Levey AS: Measurement of kidney function. Med Clin North Am 2005, 89:457-473.
  • [38]Rickli H, Benou K, Ammann P, Fehr T, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Petridis H, et al.: Time course of serial cystatin C levels in comparison with serum creatinine after application of radiocontrast media. Clin Nephrol 2004, 61:98-102.
  • [39]Vaidya VS, Ferguson MA, Bonventre JV: Biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2008, 48:463-493.
  • [40]Nielsen BS, Borregaard N, Bundgaard JR, Timshel S, Sehested M, Kjeldsen L: Induction of NGAL synthesis in epithelial cells of human colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 1996, 38:414-420.
  • [41]Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, Mitsnefes M, Zahedi K, Yang J, et al.: Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003, 14:2534-2543.
  • [42]Wagener G, Jan M, Kim M, Mori K, Barasch JM, Sladen RN, et al.: Association between increases in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and acute renal dysfunction after adult cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2006, 105:485-491.
  • [43]Dhaun N, MacIntyre IM, Kerr D, Melville V, Johnston NR, Haughie S, et al.: Selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism reduces proteinuria, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness in chronic proteinuric kidney disease. Hypertension 2011, 57:772-779.
  • [44]Fang LS, Sirota RA, Ebert TH, Lichtenstein NS: Low fractional excretion of sodium with contrast media-induced acute renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1980, 140:531-533.
  • [45]Imai K, Toyo'oka T, Watanabe Y: A novel fluorogenic reagent for thiols: ammonium 7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-sulfonate. Anal Biochem 1983, 128:471-473.
  • [46]Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72:248-254.
  • [47]Compton SJ, Jones CG: Mechanism of dye response and interference in the Bradford protein assay. Anal Biochem 1985, 151:369-374.
  • [48]Goddard J, Johnston NR, Hand MF, Cumming AD, Rabelink TJ, Rankin AJ, et al.: Endothelin-A receptor antagonism reduces blood pressure and increases renal blood flow in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure: a comparison of selective and combined endothelin receptor blockade. Circulation 2004, 109:1186-1193.
  • [49]Tepel M, van der GM, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W: Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:180-184.
  • [50]Gonzales DA, Norsworthy KJ, Kern SJ, Banks S, Sieving PC, Star RA, et al.: A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity. BMC Med 2007, 5:32. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [51]Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, Bernstein SJ, Carlos RC: Meta-analysis: effectiveness of drugs for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 2008, 148:284-294.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:48次