Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe

BMC Public Health

Simon Gregson²  Constance Nyamukapa²  Lorraine Sherr³  Shungu Munyati¹  Laura Robertson²  Phyllis Mushati¹  Morten Skovdal⁴ 

[1] Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe;School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK;Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK;Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

关键词: Zimbabwe;    Community participation HIV/AIDS;    Child health;    Incentives;    Social protection;    Cash transfers;   

Others  :  1162338
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-342

 received in 2012-07-12, accepted in 2013-04-10,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Cash transfer programmes are increasingly recognised as promising and scalable interventions that can promote the health and development of children. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for cash transfers to contribute to social division, jealousy and conflict at a community level. Against this background, and in our interest to promote community participation in cash transfer programmes, we examine local perceptions of a community-led cash transfer programme in Eastern Zimbabwe.

Methods

We collected and analysed data from 35 individual interviews and three focus group discussions, involving 24 key informants (community committee members and programme implementers), 24 cash transfer beneficiaries, of which four were youth, and 14 non-beneficiaries. Transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis and coding to generate concepts.

Results

Study participants described the programme as participatory, fair and transparent – reducing the likelihood of jealousy. The programme was perceived to have had a substantial impact on children’s health and education, primarily through aiding parents and guardians to better cater for their children’s needs. Moreover, participants alluded to the potential of the programme to facilitate more transformational change, for example by enabling families to invest money in assets and income generating activities and by promoting a community-wide sense of responsibility for the support of orphaned and vulnerable children.

Conclusion

Community participation, combined with the perceived impact of the cash transfer programme, led community members to speak enthusiastically about the programme. We conclude that community-led cash transfer programmes have the potential to open up for possibilities of participation and community agency that enable social acceptability and limit social divisiveness.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Skovdal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Standing G: How cash transfers promote the case for basic income. Basic Income Stud 2008, 3(1):1-30.
• [2]Hanlon J, Barrientos A, Hulme D: Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2010.
• [3]Attanasio O, Fitzsimons E, Gomez A, Gutierrez MI: Children's schooling and work in the presence of a conditional cash transfer program in Rural Colombia. Econ Dev Cult Change 2010, 58(2):181-210.
• [4]Fernald LCH, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM: 10-year effect of oportunidades, Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme, on child growth, cognition, language, and behaviour: a longitudinal follow-up study (vol 374, pg 1997, 2009). Lancet 2010, 376(9755):1828-1828.
• [5]Fernald LCH, Hidrobo M: Effect of Ecuador’s cash transfer program (Bono de Desarrollo Humano) on child development in infants and toddlers: A randomized effectiveness trial. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72(9):1437-1446.
• [6]Handa S, Davis B: The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Dev Pol Rev 2006, 24(5):513-536.
• [7]Jones N, Vargas R, Villar E: Cash transfers to tackle childhood poverty and vulnerability: An analysis of Peru's Juntos Programme. Environment and Urbanization 2008, 20(1):255-273.
• [8]Chant SH: Gender, generation and poverty : exploring the feminisation of poverty in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar; 2007.
• [9]Molyneux M: Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: progresa/oportunidades, Mexico's conditional transfer programme. Soc Pol Admin 2006, 40(4):425-449.
• [10]Smith-Oka V: Unintended consequences: exploring the tensions between development programs and indigenous women in Mexico in the context of reproductive health. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:2069-2077.
• [11]Saucedo Delgado OA: The gendered reading of conditionality in antipoverty programmes: unintended effects on Mexican rural households' interactions with public health institutions. Bull Lat Am Res 2012.
• [12]Handa S, Devereux S, Webb D: Social Protection for Africa's Children. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
• [13]Devereux S, Marshall J, MacAskill J, Pelham L: Making Cash Count – lessons from Cash Transfer Schemes in East and Southern Africa for support the most vulnerable children and households: Save the Children UK, HelpAge International and Institute of Development Studies. 2005. URL: http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/MakingCashCountfinal.pdf webcite - last retrieved on 15/04/2013
• [14]Adato M, Bassett L: Social protection to support vulnerable children and families: the potential of cash transfers to protect education, health and nutrition. AIDS Care 2009, 21(sup1):60-75.
• [15]Baird S, Chirwa E, McIntosh C, Özler B: The short-term impacts of a schooling conditional cash transfer program on the sexual behavior of young women. Health Econ 2010, 19(S1):55-68.
• [16]Robertson L, Mushati P, Eaton J, Dumba L, Mavise G, Makoni J, Schumacher C, Crea T, Monasch R, Sherr L: Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet 2013, 381(9874):1283-1292.
• [17]MacAuslan I, Riemenschneider N: Richer but resented: what do cash transfers do to social relations? IDS Bulletin 2011, 42(6):60-66.
• [18]Ellis F: ‘We Are All Poor Here’: economic difference, social divisiveness and targeting cash transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Stud 2012, 48(2):201-214.
• [19]Patel L, Hochfeld T: It buys food but does it change gender relations? Child support grants in Soweto South Africa. Gend Dev 2011, 19(2):229-240.
• [20]Hochfeld T, Plagerson S: Dignity and stigma among South African female cash transfer recipients. IDS Bulletin 2011, 42(6):53-59.
• [21]Ressler P: The Social Impact of Cash Transfers: A Study of the Impact of Cash Transfers on Social Networks of Kenyan Households Participating in Cash Transfer Programs. International Food Policy Research InstituteAccessed from http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/kenyacashtransfers.pdf webcite on 12/06/2012; 2008
• [22]Gregson S, Gonese E, Hallett TB, Taruberekera N, Hargrove JW, Lopman B, Corbett EL, Dorrington R, Dube S, Dehne K: HIV decline in Zimbabwe due to reductions in risky sex? Evidence from a comprehensive epidemiological review. Int J Epidemiol 2010, 39(5):1311-1323.
• [23]Halperin DT, Mugurungi O, Hallett TB, Muchini B, Campbell B, Magure T, Benedikt C, Gregson S: A surprising prevention success: why did the HIV epidemic decline in Zimbabwe? PLoS Med 2011, 8(2):e1000414.
• [24]UNICEF, GoZ,: A Situational Analysis on the Status of Women’s and Children’s Rights in Zimbabwe, 2005–2010 - A Call for Reducing Disparities and Improving Equity. Harare: UNICEF Zimbabwe and Government of Zimbabwe; 2011.
• [25]Robertson L: Quantification of orphanhood, assessment of its impacts on child health and design of an impact mitigation trial. London: Imperial College London; 2010.
• [26]Watts H, Lopman B, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S: Rising incidence and prevalence of orphanhood in Manicaland, Zimbabwe, 1998 to 2003. AIDS 2005, 19(7):717-725.
• [27]Robertson L, Mushati P, Eaton JW, Sherr L, Makoni JC, Skovdal M, Crea T, Mavise G, Dumba L, Schumacher C, Munyati S, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S: Household-based cash transfer targeting strategies in Zimbabwe: are we reaching the most vulnerable children? Soc Sci Med 2012, 75(12):2503-2508.
• [28]Skovdal M, Abebe T: Reflexivity and dialogue: methodological and socio-ethical dilemmas in research with HIV-affected children in East Africa. Ethics Pol Environ 2012, 15(1):77-96.
• [29]Attride-Stirling J: Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 2001, 1(3):385-405.
• [30]Miller CM, Tsoka M, Reichert K, Hussaini A: Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of poverty with the Malawi Social Cash Transfer. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 2010, 5(2):108-121.
• [31]Roelen K: Social protection to address the drivers of vulnerability: a bridge too far? IDS Bulletin 2011, 42(6):35-37.
• [32]Tessitore S: One step beyond: from social protection recipients to citizens. IDS Bulletin 2011, 42(6):13-20.
• [33]Skovdal M, Mwasiaji W, Morrison J, Tomkins A: Community-based capital cash transfer to support orphans in Western Kenya: A consumer perspective. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 2008, 3(1):1-15.
• [34]Skovdal M, Mwasiaji W, Webale A, Tomkins A: Building orphan competent communities: experiences from a community-based capital cash transfer initiative in Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2011, 26(3):233-241.