Environmental mobility barriers and walking for errands among older people who live alone vs. with others

BMC Public Health

Taina Rantanen¹  Johanna Eronen¹  Milla Saajanaho¹  Anne Viljanen¹  Erja Portegijs¹  Merja Rantakokko¹  Li-Tang Tsai¹ 

[1] Gerontology Research Center and Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O.Box 35, Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Finland

关键词: Living arrangements;    Environmental barriers;    Mobility;    Aging;   

Others  :  1161573
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-1054

 received in 2013-05-28, accepted in 2013-11-04,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Walking is the most popular form of physical activity among older people and for community-dwelling older people walking for errands is especially important. The aim of this study is to examine the association between self-reported environmental mobility barriers and amount of walking for errands among older people who live alone compared to those who live with others.

Methods

This observational study is based on cross-sectional data on 657 people aged 75–81 living in Jyväskylä, Central Finland. Self-reports of environmental mobility barriers were collected under four categories: Traffic, Terrain, Distances and Entrance. Persons who reported walking for errands ≤ 1.5 km/week or at most once a week were categorized as having low amount of walking for errands (LOWER). High walking for errands (HIGWER) was defined as the highest quartile of kilometers walked per week (cut-off 8.5 km, referent). The rest were defined as having moderate amount of walking for errands (MODWER). Multinominal regression analysis was used to compare the odds for LOWER vs. HIGWER and MODWER vs. HIGWER, which were formed for each environmental mobility barrier separately.

Results

Participants walked on average 6.5 km (SD 5.2) and 4.0 times (SD 2.2) per week and 14% reported LOWER. Persons living alone (57% of the participants) reported environmental mobility barriers more often than those living with others. LOWER was more common among those living with others. Among those living with others, all the environmental mobility barriers increased the odds for LOWER. In turn, among those living alone, only Distance- and Entrance- related environmental mobility barriers increased the odds for LOWER. People living alone typically run errands by themselves and become better aware of the barriers to environmental mobility, while those living with others have less exposure to environmental mobility barriers, as their walking for errands is more likely to be low.

Conclusions

These findings emphasize the need to take living arrangements into account when analyzing the association between environmental mobility barriers and walking for errands. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to better understand the temporal order of events and to find ways to enhance walking for errands among older people.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Tsai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Simonsick EM, Guralnik JM, Volpato S, Balfour J, Fried LP: Just get out the door! Importance of walking outside the home for maintaining mobility: findings from the women’s health and aging study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005, 53(2):198-203.
• [2]Wong CH, Wong SF, Pang WS, Azizah MY, Dass MJ: Habitual walking and its correlation to better physical function: implications for prevention of physical disability in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003, 58(6):M555-M560.
• [3]Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF: Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27(1):67-76.
• [4]Leyden KM: Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 2003, 93(9):1546-1551.
• [5]Murtagh EM, Murphy MH, Boone-Heinonen J: Walking–the first steps in cardiovascular disease prevention. Curr Opin Cardiol 2010, 25(5):490-496.
• [6]Hinrichs T, Trampisch U, Burghaus I, Endres HG, Klaaßen-Mielke R, Moschny A, Platen P: Correlates of sport participation among community-dwelling elderly people in Germany: a cross-sectional study. Eur Rev Aging Phy Activ 2010, 7(2):105-115.
• [7]Siren A, Hakamies-Blomqvist L: Does gendered driving create gendered mobility? Community-related mobility in Finnish women and men aged 65. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav 2006, 9(5):374-382.
• [8]Rasinaho M, Hirvensalo M, Leinonen R, Lintunen T, Rantanen T: Motives for and barriers to physical activity among older adults with mobility limitations. J Aging Phys Act 2007, 15(1):90-102.
• [9]Rantakokko M, Mänty M, Iwarsson S, Törmäkangas T, Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Rantanen T: Fear of moving outdoors and development of outdoor walking difficulty in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009, 57(4):634-640.
• [10]Rantakokko M, Iwarsson S, Hirvensalo M, Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Rantanen T: Unmet physical activity need in old age. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010, 58(4):707-712.
• [11]Eronen J, von Bonsdorff M, Rantakokko M, Rantanen T: Environmental facilitators for outdoor walking and development of walking difficulty in community-dwelling older adults. Eur J Ageing 2013. doi:10.1007/s10433-013-0283-7
• [12]Shigematsu R, Sallis J, Conway T, Saelens B, Frank L, Cain K, Chapman J, King A: Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41(2):314-321.
• [13]Shimura H, Sugiyama T, Winkler E, Owen N: High neighborhood walkability mitigates declines in middle-to-older aged adults’ walking for transport. J Phys Act Health 2012, 9(7):1004-1008.
• [14]Frank L, Kerr J, Rosenberg D, King A: Healthy aging and where you live: community design relationships with physical activity and body weight in older Americans. J Phys Act Health 2010, 7(1):S82-S90.
• [15]Van Cauwenberg J, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Holle V, Verté D, De Witte N, De Donder L, Buffel T, Dury S, Deforche B: Older adults’ transportation walking: a cross-sectional study on the cumulative influence of physical environmental factors. Int J Health Geographics 2013, 12(1):37. 10.1186/1476-072X-12-37 BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Satariano WA, Guralnik JM, Jackson RJ, Marottoli RA, Phelan EA, Prohaska TR: Mobility and aging: new directions for public health action. Am J Public Health 2012, 102(8):1508-1515.
• [17]Simonsick EM, Guralnik JM, Fried LP: Who walks? Factors associated with walking behavior in disabled older women with and without self-reported walking difficulty. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 47(6):672-680.
• [18]Sok SR, Yun EK: A comparison of physical health status, self‒esteem, family support and health‒promoting behaviours between aged living alone and living with family in Korea. J Clin Nurs 2011, 20(11–12):1606-1612.
• [19]Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Hirvensalo M, Lintunen T, Rasinaho M, Sakari‒Rantala R, Kallinen M, Koski J, Möttönen S, Kannas S, Huovinen P, Rantanen T: Customer‒oriented counseling for physical activity in older people: study protocol and selected baseline results of a randomized‒controlled trial (ISRCTN 07330512). Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007, 17(2):156-164.
• [20]Mänty M, Heinonen A, Leinonen R, Törmäkangas T, Hirvensalo M, Kallinen M, Sakari R, von Bonsdorff MB, Heikkinen E, Rantanen T: Long-term effect of physical activity counseling on mobility limitation among older people: a randomized controlled study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009, 64(1):83-89.
• [21]Shimada H, Ishizaki T, Kato M, Morimoto A, Tamate A, Uchiyama Y, Yasumura S: How often and how far do frail elderly people need to go outdoors to maintain functional capacity? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010, 50(2):140-146.
• [22]Hakim AA, Petrovitch H, Burchfiel CM, Ross GW, Rodriguez BL, White LR, Yano K, Curb JD, Abbott RD: Effects of walking on mortality among nonsmoking retired men. N Engl J Med 1998, 338(2):94-99.
• [23]Rantakokko M, Iwarsson S, Mänty M, Leinonen R, Rantanen T: Perceived barriers in the outdoor environment and development of walking difficulties in older people. Age Ageing 2012, 41(1):118-121.
• [24]Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-reported scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychol Measurement 1977, 1:385-401.
• [25]Stoller EP, Earl LL: Help with activities of everyday life: Sources of support for the noninstitutionalized elderly. Gerontologist 1983, 23(1):64-70.
• [26]Fänge A, Iwarsson S: Accessibility and usability in housing: Construct validity and implications for research and practice. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25(23):1316-1325.
• [27]Nagel CL, Carlson NE, Bosworth M, Michael YL: The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 168(4):461-468.
• [28]Michael Y, Beard T, Choi D, Farquhar S, Carlson N: Measuring the influence of built neighborhood environments on walking in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2006, 14(3):302-312.
• [29]Satariano WA, Haight TJ, Tager IB: Living arrangements and participation in leisure-time physical activities in an older population. J Aging Health 2002, 14(4):427-451.
• [30]Sarwari A, Fredman L, Langenberg P, Magaziner J: Prospective study on the relation between living arrangement and change in functional health status of elderly women. Am J Epidemiol 1998, 147(4):370-378.
• [31]Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, Kawachi I: Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. Am J Epidemiol 2001, 153(2):123-131.
• [32]Gómez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, Brownson RC, Sarmiento OL, Pinzón JD, Ardila M, Moreno J, Serrato M, Lobelo F: Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogotá. Am J Prev Med 2010, 38(6):592-599.
• [33]Kemperman A, Timmerman H: Influences of built environment on walking and cycling by latent segments of aging population. Transport Res Record: J Transport Res Board 2009, 2134:1-9.
• [34]Ståhl A, Carlsson G, Hovbrandt P, Iwarsson S: “Let’s go for a walk!”: identification and prioritisation of accessibility and safety measures involving elderly people in a residential area. Eur J Ageing 2008, 5(3):265-273.
• [35]Armstrong GK, Morgan K: Stability and change in levels of habitual physical activity in later life. Age Ageing 1998, 27(suppl 3):17-23.