Walking and cycling to work despite reporting an unsupportive environment: insights from a mixed-method exploration of counterintuitive findings

BMC Public Health

David Ogilvie²  Jenna Panter²  Cornelia Guell¹ 

[1] Present address: Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, PO Box 64, BB11000 Bridgetown, Barbados;Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK

关键词: Environmental perceptions;    Active commuting;    Transport;    Mixed methods;   

Others  :  1162184
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-497

 received in 2012-11-16, accepted in 2013-05-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Perceptions of the environment appear to be associated with walking and cycling. We investigated the reasons for walking and cycling to or from work despite reporting an unsupportive route environment in a sample of commuters.

Methods

This mixed-method analysis used data collected as part of the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study. 1164 participants completed questionnaires which assessed the travel modes used and time spent on the commute and the perceived environmental conditions on the route to work. A subset of 50 also completed qualitative interviews in which they discussed their experiences of commuting. Participants were included in this analysis if they reported unsupportive conditions for walking or cycling on their route (e.g. heavy traffic) in questionnaires, walked or cycled all or part of the journey to work, and completed qualitative interviews. Using content analysis of these interviews, we investigated their reasons for walking or cycling.

Results

340 participants reported walking or cycling on the journey to work despite unsupportive conditions, of whom 15 also completed qualitative interviews. From these, three potential explanations emerged. First, some commuters found strategies for coping with unsupportive conditions. Participants described knowledge of the locality and opportunities for alternative routes more conducive to active commuting, as well as their cycling experience and acquired confidence to cycle in heavy traffic. Second, some commuters had other reasons for being reliant on or preferring active commuting despite adverse environments, such as childcare arrangements, enjoyment, having more control over their journey time, employers’ restrictions on car parking, or the cost of petrol or parking. Finally, some survey respondents appeared to have reported not their own environmental perceptions but those of others such as family members or ‘the public’, partly to make a political statement regarding the adversity of active commuting in their setting.

Conclusions

Participants report walking and cycling to work despite adverse environmental conditions. Understanding this resilience might be just as important as investigating ‘barriers’ to cycling. These findings suggest that developing knowledge of safe walking and cycling routes, improving cycling confidence and restricting workplace parking may help to encourage walking and cycling to and from work.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Guell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wing RR, Hill JO: Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr 2001, 21(1):323-341.
• [2]Andersen LB, Schnohr P, Schroll M, Hein HO: All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160(11):1621-1628.
• [3]Samitz G, Egger M, Zwahlen M: Domains of physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011, 40(5):1382-1400.
• [4]Vuori IM, Oja P, Paronen O: Physically active commuting to work–testing its potential for exercise promotion. Medicine & Science in Sports and Exercise 1994, 26(7):844-850.
• [5]Department for Transport: Creating growth, cutting carbon: making sustainable local transport happen. London: Department for Transport; 2011.
• [6]Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J: An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 2006, 27(1):297-322.
• [7]Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ: The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54(12):1793-1812.
• [8]Titze S, Stronegger W, Janschitz S, Oja P: Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. J Phys Act Health 2007, 4:66-79.
• [9]Panter J, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Ogilvie D: Correlates of time spent walking and cycling to and from work: baseline results from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8(1):124. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Aldred R: On the outside: constructing cycling citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography 2010, 11(1):35-52.
• [11]Pooley C, Horton D, Scheldeman G, Tight M, Jones T, Harwatt H, Jopson A: Household decision-making for everyday travel: a case study of walking and cycling in Lancaster (UK). J Transp Geogr 2011, 19:1601-1607.
• [12]Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B: The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev 2000, 71(3):543-562.
• [13]Ball K, Dollman J: Physical activity, healthy eating and obesity prevention: understanding and promoting 'resilience' amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Australasian epidemiologist 2010, 17(3):16-17.
• [14]MacFarlane A, Abbott G, Crawford D, Ball K: Personal, social and environmental correlates of healthy weight status amongst mothers from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods: findings from the READI study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7(1):23. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Clarke N: Investigating promoters and barriers of active travel in primary school children: a mixed methodological approach. Galway: Health Promotion Research Centre; 2011.
• [16]Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S: Shoe leather epidemiology: active travel and transport infrastructure in the urban landscape. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7(1):43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Sale JEM, Lohfeld LH, Brazil K: Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: implications for mixed-methods research. Qual Quant 2002, 36:43-53.
• [18]Sommer Harrits G: More than method? A discussion of paradigm differences within mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2011, 5(2):150-166.
• [19]Brannen J: Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. Int J Social Research Methodology 2005, 8(3):173-184.
• [20]O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J: Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010, 341:c4587.
• [21]Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Guell C, Panter J, Jones N, Cohn S, Yang L, Chapman C: Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Publ Health 2010, 10(1):703. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Shannon T, Giles-Corti B, Pikora T, Bulsara M, Shilton T, Bull F: Active commuting in a university setting: assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change. Transport Policy 2006, 13(3):240-253.
• [23]Guell C, Panter J, Jones NR, Ogilvie D: Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: Using social theory to explore everyday commuting. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75(1):233-239.
• [24]Guell C, Ogilvie D: Picturing commuting: photovoice and seeking wellbeing in everyday travel. Qual Res 2013. http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/04/1468794112468472.abstract webcite
• [25]Adamson J, Ben-Shlomo Y, Chaturvedi N, Donovan J: Exploring the impact of patient views on appropriate use of services and help seeking: a mixed method study. Br J Gen Pract 2009, 59(564):e226-e233.
• [26]Panter J, Desousa C, Ogilvie D: Incorporating walking or cycling into car journeys to and from work: the role of individual, workplace and environmental characteristics. Prev Med 2013, 56(3–4):211-217.
• [27]Ogilvie D, Bull F, Powell J, Cooper AR, Brand C, Mutrie N, Preston J, Rutter H: An applied ecological framework for evaluating infrastructure to promote walking and cycling: the iConnect study. Am J Public Health 2011, 101(3):473-481.
• [28]Joshi MS, Senior V: Journey to work: the potential for modal shift? Health Educ J 1998, 57(3):212-223.
• [29]Rimer B: Models of individual health behaviour. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Edited by Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1990.
• [30]Skinner D, Rosen P: Hell is other cyclists: rethinking transport and identity. In Cycling and Society. Edited by Horton D, Rosen P, Cox P. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:83-96.
• [31]Goodman A, Guell C, Panter J, Jones NR, Ogilvie D: Healthy travel and the socio-economic structure of car commuting in Cambridge, UK: a mixed-methods analysis. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74(12):1929-1938.
• [32]Jones C, Ogilvie D: Motivations for active commuting: a qualitative investigation of the period of home or work relocation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9(1):109. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Kingham S, Dickinson J, Copsey S: Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. Transport Policy 2001, 8(2):151-160.
• [34]Willson R, Shoup D: Parking subsidies and travel choices: assessing the evidence. Transportation 1990, 17(2):141-157.
• [35]Gamson WA, Modigliani A: Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 1989, 95(1):1-37.
• [36]Horton D: Fear of cycling. In Cycling and society. Edited by Rosen P, Cox P, Horton D. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:133-152.
• [37]Morgan DL: Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res 1998, 8(3):362-376.
• [38]Winters M, Teschke K, Grant M, Setton EM, Brauer M: How far out of the way will we travel? Built environment influences on route selection for bicycle and car travel. Transportation Research Part D 2010, 2190(1):1-10.
• [39]Broach J, Dill J, Gliebe J: Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2012, 46(10):1730-1740.