期刊论文详细信息
BMC International Health and Human Rights
What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
Moses Mulumba6  Everaldo Lamprea1  Attiya Waris7  Eric Friedman3  Audrey Chapman5  Gorik Ooms2  Lisa Forman4 
[1]Los Andes University, Cra 1 Nº 18A- 12, Bogota, Colombia
[2]Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
[3]Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington DC 20001, USA
[4]Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
[5]University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA
[6]Centre for Health, Human Rights and Development, Plot 614 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya, PO Box 16617, Wandegeya, Kampala, Uganda
[7]University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 30197 – 00100 Parklands Campus, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词: Equity;    Global health;    Post-2015 health development agenda;    Millennium development goals;    Minimum core obligations;    Right to health;    Human rights;   
Others  :  855054
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-698X-13-48
 received in 2013-06-07, accepted in 2013-11-19,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary.

Discussion

To prevent progressive realization from undermining both domestic and international responsibilities towards health, international human rights law institutions developed the idea of non-derogable “minimum core” obligations to provide essential health services. While minimum core obligations have enjoyed some uptake in human rights practice and scholarship, their definition in international law fails to specify which health services should fall within their scope, or to specify wealthy country obligations to assist poorer countries. These definitional gaps undercut the capacity of minimum core obligations to protect essential health needs against inaction, austerity and illegitimate trade-offs in both domestic and global action. If the right to health is to effectively advance essential global health needs in these contexts, weaknesses within the minimum core concept must be resolved through innovative research on social, political and legal conceptualizations of essential health needs.

Summary

We believe that if the minimum core concept is strengthened in these ways, it will produce a more feasible and grounded conception of legally prioritized health needs that could assist in advancing health equity, including by providing a framework rooted in legal obligations to guide the formulation of new health development goals, providing a baseline of essential health services to be protected as a matter of right against governmental claims of scarcity and inadequate international assistance, and empowering civil society to claim fulfillment of their essential health needs from domestic and global decision-makers.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Forman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140722025118707.pdf 250KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda: Realizing the Future We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations; 2012.
  • [2]World Health Organization: Positioning Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: WHO Discussion Paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  • [3]Chapman AR, Russell S: Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2002.
  • [4]World Health Organization: The World Health Report - Health Systems Financing: The Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  • [5]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment 3: The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations (UN Doc E/1991/23). Geneva: United Nations; 1991.
  • [6]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 12: The Right to Adequate Food (UN Doc E/C.12/1999/5). Geneva: United Nations; 1999.
  • [7]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (UN Doc E/C.12/2002/11). Geneva: United Nations; 2002.
  • [8]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 18: The Right to Work (UN Doc E/C.12/GC/18). Geneva: United Nations; 2005.
  • [9]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 19: The Right to Social Security (UN Doc E/C.12/GC/19). Geneva: United Nations; 2007.
  • [10]United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women: General Recommendation No. 28: The Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/28). New York: United Nations; 2010.
  • [11]United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women: Views of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women under article 7, paragraph 3 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Concerning Communication No. 17/2008 (UN Doc CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008). New York: United Nations; 2011.
  • [12]Hammond R, Ooms G, Vandenhole W: Under the (legal) radar screen: Global health initiatives and international human rights obligations. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012, 12:31. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [13]Nations U: Health in the Post-2015 Agenda: Report of the Global Thematic Consultation on Health. 2013.
  • [14]Nations U: High Level Dialogue on Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Meeting Report. Gaborone: United Nations; 2013.
  • [15]Nations U: A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies through Sustainable Development: Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: United Nations; 2013.
  • [16]United Nations General Assembly: Global Health and Foreign Policy Resolution A/67/L.36. Geneva: United Nations; 2012.
  • [17]Nations U: Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations; 2000.
  • [18]Vandemoortele J: Are we reducing global poverty? In World Poverty: New Policies to Defeat and Old Enemy. Edited by Townsend P, Gordon D. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2002.
  • [19]Vandemoortele J: The MDG story: intention denied. Dev & Change 2011, 421:1-21.
  • [20]United nations millennium development goals http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ webcite
  • [21]Economist: Ends without Means. http://www.economist.com/node/3173136 webcite
  • [22]Pogge T: Recognized and violated by international law: the human rights of the global poor. Leiden J Intl Law 2005, 18:717-745.
  • [23]Wisor S: After the MDGs: citizen deliberation and the post-2015 development framework. Ethics Int Aff 2012, 26(1):113-133.
  • [24]Alston P: Ships passing in the night: the current state of the human rights and development debate seen through the lens of the millennium development goals. Hum Rts Q 2005, 27:755-829.
  • [25]Easterly W: Was Africa set up to fail on the millennium development goals? http://aidwatchers.com/2010/06/was-africa-set-up-to-fail-on-the-millennium-development-goals/ webcite
  • [26]Darrow M: The millennium development goals: milestones or millstones? Human rights priorities for the post-2015 development agenda. Yale Hum Rts & Dev L J 2012, 15:1-66.
  • [27]London L, Schneider H: Globalisation and health inequalities: can a human rights paradigm create space for civil society action? Soc Sci Med 2012, 74(1):6-13.
  • [28]Clemens MA, Kenny CJ, Moss TJ: The trouble with the MDGs: confronting expectations of aid and development success. http://www.cgdev.org/publication/trouble-mdgs-confronting-expectations-aid-and-development-success-working-paper-40 webcite
  • [29]Nations U: Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. New York: United Nations; 2012.
  • [30]World Health Organization: Millennium development goals (MDGs): fact sheet No. 290. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs290/en/ webcite
  • [31]Lozano R, Wang H, Foreman KJ, Rajaratnam JK, Naghavi M, Marcus JR, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Lofgren KT, Philips D, Atkinson C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL: Progress towards millennium development goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2011, 378(9797):1139-1165.
  • [32]Millennium Development Goal Gap Task Force: The Global Partnership for Development: Making Rhetoric a Reality. New York: United Nations; 2012.
  • [33]Assembly UNG: Outcome document of the special event to follow up efforts made towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Geneva: United Nations; 2013.
  • [34]United Nations Non-Governmental Liaison Service: Post-2015 Primer Series Primer #1: Overview of UN Intergovernmental Processes to Define the Post-2015 Development Agenda. available at http://www.un-ngls.org/spip.php?article4333 webcite
  • [35]Canfin P, Eide EB, Natalegawa M, Ndiaye M, Nkoana-Mashabane M, Patriota A, Towichakchaikul S: Our common vision for the positioning and role of health to advance the UN development agenda beyond 2015. Lancet 2013, 381(9881):1885-1886.
  • [36]Network SDS: An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development: Report for the Secretary-General. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2013.
  • [37]Assembly UNG: A life of dignity for all: accelerating process towards the Millennium Development Goals and advancing the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015. Geneva: United Nations; 2013.
  • [38]United Nations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris: United Nations; 1948.
  • [39]United Nations: International Covenant on Economic. New York: Social and Cultural Rights; 1966.
  • [40]United Nations: International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. New York: United Nations; 1965.
  • [41]United Nations: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. New York: United Nations; 1979.
  • [42]United Nations: Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: United Nations; 1990.
  • [43]United Nations: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006.
  • [44]Council of Europe: The European Social Charter. Turin: Council of Europe; 1961.
  • [45]Organization of African Unity: African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, 27 June 1981, O.A.U. Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58. Banjul: Organization of African Unity; 1981.
  • [46]Organization of American States: Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. San Salvador: Organization of American States; 1988.
  • [47]Kinney ED, Clark BA: Provisions for health and health-care in the constitutions of the countries of the world. Cornell Int LJ 2004, 37:285-355.
  • [48]Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: The Right to Health: Fact Sheet No. 31. Geneva: United Nations; 2008.
  • [49]Yamin AE, Gloppen S: Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2011.
  • [50]Hogerzeil HV, Samson M, Casanovas JV, Rahmani-Ocora L: Is access to essential medicines as part of the fulfillment of the right to health enforceable through the courts? Lancet 2006, 368(9532):305-311.
  • [51]Forman L: Rights’ and wrongs: what utility for the right to health in reforming trade rules on medicines? Health Hum Rights 2008, 10(2):37-52.
  • [52]Yamin AE: From ideals to tools: applying human rights to maternal health. PLOS Medicine 2013, 10(11):e1001546.
  • [53]Schrecker T: The health case for economic and social rights against the global marketplace. Int J HR 2011, 10(2):151-177.
  • [54]Forman L: An elementary consideration of humanity? linking trade-related intellectual property rights to the human right to health in International Law. J World Intellect Property 2011, 14(2):155-175.
  • [55]Gagnon ML, Labonté R: Human rights in global health diplomacy: a critical assessment. Int J HR 2011, 10(2):189-213.
  • [56]Ooms G, Hammond R: Global governance of health and the requirements of human rights. Global Pol J 2012, 3(4):476-479.
  • [57]World Health Organization: Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations; 2011.
  • [58]United Nations: Political Declaration of the High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: United Nations; 2011.
  • [59]Nelson PJ: Human rights, the millennium development goals, and the future of development cooperation. World Dev 2007, 35(12):2041-2055.
  • [60]Ooms G, Brolan C, Eggermont N, Eide A, Flores W, Forman L, Friedman E, Gebauer T, Gostin L, Hill PS, Hussain S, McKee M, Mulumba M, Siddiqui F, Sridhar D, Van Leemput L, Waris A, Jahn A: Post-2015: universal health coverage anchored in the right to health and accountable governance. Bull World Health Organ 2012, 91(2):2A.
  • [61]Langford M: A poverty of rights: six ways to fix the MDGs. IDS Bull 2010, 41(1):83-91.
  • [62]International Commission of Jurists, et al.: Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Maastricht: International Commission of Jurists; 2012.
  • [63]Aust A: Handbook of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
  • [64]United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4. Geneva: United Nations; 2000.
  • [65]Constitutional Court of Colombia: Sala Segunda de Revisión, Sentencia T-760. Magistrado Ponente: Manuel José Cepeda; 2008.
  • [66]Lamprea E: Colombia’s right to health litigation in the context of health care reform. In The Right to Health in a Globalized World. Edited by Flood CM, Gross A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. in press
  • [67]Yamin AE, Parra-Vera O: How do courts set health policy? The case of the Colombian constitutional court. PLoS Med 2009, 6(2):e1000032.
  • [68]Court CRS: Resolution 5934–97. San José: Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica; 1997.
  • [69]Court CRS: Resolution 00043–07. San José: Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica; 2007.
  • [70]Court CRS: Resolution 8339–2009. San José: Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica; 2009.
  • [71]Supreme Court of India: Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity & Ors.v. State of West Bengal & Anr, A.I.R. 2426 (4) SCC 37. India: Supreme Court of India; 1996.
  • [72]Supreme Court India: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition (C) No. 196 of 2001 (2003). India: Supreme Court of India; 2001.
  • [73]UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda: Towards freedom from fear and want: Human rights in the post-2015 agenda. New York: United Nations; 2012.
  • [74]ActionAid: Righting the MDGs: Context and Opportunities for a post-2015 development Framework. London: Action Aid; http://post2015.org/2012/10/16/righting-the-mdgs-contexts-and-opportunities-for-apost-2015-development-framework/ webcite
  • [75]Go4Health: (Ooms, Gorik, Brolan, Claire, Eggermont, Natalie, Eide, Asbjørn, Flores, Walter, Forman, Lisa, Friedman Eric, Gebauer, Thomas, Gostin, Lawrence, Hill, Peter S., Hussain, Sameera, McKee, Martin, Mulumba, Moses, Siddiqui, Faraz, Sridhar, Devi, Van Leemput, Luc, Waris, Attiya and Jahn, Albrecht): “The post-2015 international health agenda: universal health coverage and healthy environment, both anchored in the right to health” Submission to WHO, UNICEF, Botswana and Sweden Thematic Consultation on Health in the Post- 2015 Agenda. Antwerp: Go4Health; 2012.
  • [76]Gostin LO, Friedman EA, Ooms G, Gebauer T, Gupta N, Sridhar D, Chenguang W, Røttingen JA, Sanders D: The joint action and learning initiative: towards a global agreement on national and global responsibilities for health. PLoS Med 2011, 8(5):e1001031.
  • [77]Simma B, Alston P: The sources of human rights law: Custom, Jus Cogens and general principles. Australian YBIL 1992, 12:82-108.
  • [78]Craven M: The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on its Development. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995.
  • [79]Lehmann K: In Defence of the constitutional court: litigating economic and social rights and the myth of the minimum core. Am U Int L Rev 2006, 22:163-197.
  • [80]Young KG: The minimum core of economic and social rights: a concept in search of content. Yale J Intl L 2008, 33:113-175.
  • [81]People’s Health Movement: Global Health Watch 3: An Alternative World Health Report. London: Zedbooks; 2011.
  • [82]People’s Health Movement: WHA66: statement on universal health coverage. http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7600 webcite
  • [83]South African Constitutional Court: Government of the republic of South Africa and others v. Irene Grootboom and others. In Butterworths Constitutional Law Reports 1169. Durban: LexisNexis South Africa; 2000.
  • [84]South African Constitutional Court: Minister of health and another v. treatment action campaign and others. In South African Law Report 721. Durban: LexisNexis South Africa; 2002.
  • [85]South African Constitutional Court: Mazibuko and others v city of Johannesburg and others. In South African Law Report 1. Durban: LexisNexis South Africa; 2010.
  • [86]Bilchitz D: Towards a reasonable approach to the minimum core: laying the foundations for future socio-economic rights jurisprudence. SAJHR 2002, 19:1-26.
  • [87]Liebenberg S: South Africa’s evolving jurisprudence on socio-economic rights. LDD 2002, 6(2):159-191.
  • [88]Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME): Financing Global Health 2011: Continued growth as MDG deadline approaches. Seattle: IHME; 2011.
  • [89]Forman L, Cole D, Ooms G, Zwarenstein M: Human rights and global health funding: what contribution can the right to health make to sustaining and extending international assistance for health? GHGJ 2012, 5(1):1-34.
  • [90]World Health Organization: Declaration of Alma-Ata. Alma Ata; 1978.
  • [91]Bank W: World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. Washington: The World Bank; 1993.
  • [92]Ministerio de Salud: Acesso Universal Garantías Explícitas (AUGE) 80. 2013. available at http://www.chileatiende.cl/fichas/ver/2464 webcite
  • [93]Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D: Miraya J (Eds): International Profiles of Health Care Systems. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
  • [94]Foundation R: Catalyzing Change: The System Reform Costs of Universal Health Coverage. New York: Rockefeller Foundation; 2010.
  • [95]Ugandan Ministry of Health: Health Sector Strategic and Investment Plan: Promoting People’s Health To Enhance Socio-Economic Development 2010/11 – 2014/15. http://www.unicef.org/uganda/HSSIP_Final.pdf webcite
  • [96]Schrecker T: Interrogating scarcity: how to think about resource-poor settings. Health Policy Plann 2012, 28(4):400-409.
  • [97]Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME): Financing Global Health 2012: The End of the Golden Age?. Seattle: IHME; 2012:2012.
  • [98]Stockholm International Peace Research Institute: Trends in international military expenditure, 2012. http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/Top%2015%20table%202012.pdf webcite
  • [99]Waris A: Tax and Development Law Africa. Law Africa: Nairobi; 2013.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:43次