期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Factors affecting sick leave prescribing in occupational health care: a survey based on hypothetical patient cases
Risto J Tuominen2  Tuula M Putus3  Anni T Kankaanpää1 
[1] Department of Public Health, University of Turku, and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;Department of Public Health, University of Turku, and Primary Health Care Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;Department of Occupational Health Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
关键词: Health services research;    Sickness absence;    Clinical medicine;    Occupational health care;    Sick leave;   
Others  :  1132743
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-168
 received in 2012-09-07, accepted in 2014-04-11,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Several studies have shown considerable differences in the way that physicians prescribe sick leave. The aim of this study was to examine the sick leave prescribing practices of occupational health care physicians and factors affecting these practices.

Methods

A questionnaire study with 19 hypothetical patient cases was conducted among 356 Finnish occupational health care physicians. The effects of both physician-related and local structural background variables on sick leave prescribing were studied using regression models. Economic consequences of the variation in sick leave prescribing were estimated.

Results

When the cases were considered individually, the variation in prescribed sick leave days was relatively small. However, when considered together, variation in prescribing practice became apparent. On average, the overall number of days of sick leave prescribed for the entire group of 19 patient cases was 85.8, varying between 21 and 170 days. The physicians working at a public health center and those with more than 20 years experience as an occupational health physician tended to prescribe more days of sick leave than others. The quartile of physicians who prescribed the fewest days of sick leave would have resulted in mean production losses (17,100 euro, 95% CI 16,400-17,700) that were half those in the quartile with the most days of sick leave (34,800 euro, 95% CI 33,600-35,900).

Conclusions

There was variation in the sick leave prescribing practices of occupational health care physicians. The most significant factor affecting this variation was the health care sector (public, private or employer clinic) employing the physicians. Variation in sick leave prescribing patterns can lead to inequality between patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kankaanpää et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150304073023988.pdf 191KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Peterson S, Eriksson M, Tibblin G: Practice variation in Swedish primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997, 15:68-75.
  • [2]Rutle O, Forsen L: Allmenpraksis-Tema med Variasjoner. (Inter-Doctor Variation in General Practice.). Oslo: National Institute of Public Health, Department of Health Services Research; 1984. Report No.: 8
  • [3]Arrelöv BE, Borgquist L, Ljungberg D, Svärdsudd KF: Do GPs sick-list patients to a lesser extent than other physician categories? A population-based study. Fam Pract 2001, 18:393-398.
  • [4]Wahlström R, Alexanderson K: Chapter 11. Physicians’ sick-listing practices. Scand J Public Health 2004, 32(Suppl 63):222-255.
  • [5]Löfgren A, Hagberg J, Arrelöv B, Ponzer S, Alexanderson K: Frequency and nature of problems associated with sickness certification tasks: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5455 physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007, 25:178-185.
  • [6]Swartling MS, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K, Wahlström RA: Sick-listing as a psychosocial work problem: a survey of 3997 Swedish physicians. J Occup Rehabil 2007, 17:398-408.
  • [7]Swartling MS, Alexanderson KAE, Wahlström RA: Barriers to good sickness certification – an interview study with Swedish general practitioners. Scand J Publ Health 2008, 36:408-414.
  • [8]Englund L, Svärdsudd K: Sick-listing habits among general practitioners in a Swedish county. Scand J Prim Health Care 2000, 18:81-86.
  • [9]Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM: Sickness certification and the GP: what really happens in practice? Fam Pract 2010, 27:344-350.
  • [10]Himmel W, Sandholzer H, Kochen M: Sickness certification in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract 1995, 1:161-166.
  • [11]Englund L, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF: Variations in sick-listing practice among male and female physicians of different specialities based on case vignettes. Scand J Prim Health Care 2000, 18:48-52.
  • [12]Norrmén G, Svärdsudd K, Andersson DKG: How primary health care physicians make sick listing decisions: The impact of medical factors and functioning. BMC Fam Pract 2008, 9:3. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [13]Kankaanpää AT, Franck JK, Tuominen RJ: Variations in primary care physicians’ sick leave prescribing practices. Eur J Publ Health 2012, 22:92-96.
  • [14]Arrelöv BE, Borgquist L, Svärdsudd KF: Influence of local structural factors on physicians’ sick-listing practice: a population-based study. Eur J Public Health 2005, 5:470-474.
  • [15]Norrmén G, Svärdsudd K, Andersson D: Impact of physician-related factors on sickness certification in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006, 24:104-109.
  • [16]Tellnes G, Sandvik L, Torbjorn M: Inter-doctor variation in sickness certification. Scand J Prim Health Care 1990, 8:45-52.
  • [17]Kuusisto H, Molnár G: Irti jonosta ilman lisäresursseja. (Abolishing queues for specialist care without extra staff.). Suom Laakaril 2005, 60(12–13):1443-1446.
  • [18]Holt W Jr, Mazzuca SA: Prescribing behaviors of family physicians in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Fam Med 1992, 24:524-527.
  • [19]Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M: Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141(10):771-780.
  • [20]Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M: Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000, 283(13):1715-1722.
  • [21]Rethans JJ: Validity of case simulations. J Clin Epidemiol 1991, 44:1119-1120.
  • [22]Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J: Written case simulations: do they predict physicians’ behaviour? J Clin Epidemiol 1990, 43:805-815.
  • [23]Confederation of Finnish Industries: Sairauspoissaolojen hallinta. (Managing sickness absence). 2009. http://pda.ek.fi/www/fi/tutkimukset_julkaisut/2009/SPopas_yrityksille.pdf webcite
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:38次