期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Measles vaccine coverage estimates in an outbreak three years after the nation-wide campaign in China: implications for measles elimination, 2013
Lidong Gao6  Huiming Luo4  Junhua Li6  Li Li4  Huaqing Wang4  Shanliang Xiao5  Bosong Guo1  Lance Rodewald2  Qiru Su4  Lixin Hao4  Yanhua Yang6  Mengjuan Duan4  Hong Zhang6  Xiang Zheng3  Fangjun Li6  Chao Ma4 
[1]Longhui County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoyang, Hu Nan province, China
[2]World Health Organization Office in China, Beijing, China
[3]Taizhou Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, Zhe Jiang province, China
[4]National Immunization Programme, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
[5]Shaoyang Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoyang, Hu Nan province, China
[6]Hunan Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hu Nan province, China
关键词: China;    Elimination;    Estimation;    Coverage;    Vaccination;    Measles;   
Others  :  1089840
DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-015-0752-z
 received in 2014-10-27, accepted in 2015-01-12,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

China is approaching measles elimination, but indigenous measles still circulates. County L in China has reported measles-containing vaccine (MCV) coverage rates >95% since 2000. Despite high reported coverage, a large measles outbreak occurred among young children in L County. We measured MCV coverage using 5 different methods during an investigation on this outbreak and compared our estimates with reported rates.

Methods

Reported coverage rates are determined by aggregating clinic-based data across the county: doses administered in each clinic divided by the number of children registered in each clinic. Our methods estimated coverage for the 2010–2012 birth cohort, and were (1) administrative method: doses administered in clinics divided by the birth cohort recorded in the Statistical Year Book, (2) house-to-house convenience-sample survey of children living near cases, (3) vaccination clinic records review, (4) determination of a convenience sample of measles outbreak cases’ vaccination statuses and using the field vaccine efficacy outbreak equation to estimate population coverage, and (5) a seroprevalence survey using a convenience sample of residual blood samples from hospitals.

Results

The measles outbreak totaled 215 cases, representing an incidence of 195.8 per million population. Our estimated MCV coverage rates were: (1) administrative method: 84.1%-87.0% for MCV1 and 80.3%-90.0% for MCV2, (2) in-house survey: 83.3% of 9–17 month children received MCV1, and 74.5% of 24–47 month children received MCV2, (3) clinic record review: 85.5% of 9–17 month children received MCV1, and 73.2% of 24–59 month children received MCV2, (4) field VE method: 83.6% of 9–47 month children received one or more MCV doses, and (5) serology: seropositive rates were <80% in the 12–17 and 18–23 month age cohorts.

Conclusions

Compared with reported coverage >95%, our 5 coverage assessments all showed substantially lower coverage. China should evaluate guidelines for reporting vaccination coverage and identify feasible improvements to the assessment methods.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128152357673.pdf 652KB PDF download
Figure 2. 21KB Image download
Figure 1. 26KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]WHO: Progress towards the 2012 measles elimination goal in WHO’s Western Pacific Region, 1990–2008 Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2009, 84(27):271-9.
  • [2]Ma C, An Z, Hao L, Cairns KL, Zhang Y, Ma J, et al.: Progress toward measles elimination in the People’s Republic of China, 2000–2009. J Infect Dis 2011, 204(Suppl 1):S447-54.
  • [3]Ma C, Hao L, Zhang Y, Su Q, Rodewald L, An Z, et al.: Monitoring progress towards the elimination of measles in China: epidemiological observations, implications and next steps. Bull World Health Organ 2014, 92(5):340-7.
  • [4]WHO. Immunization: measles (MCV) by country. [http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.A826] (Accessed on 23 Jan 2015).
  • [5]Wendi W, Dawei L, Lei C, Biao G, Lingsheng C, Huaqing W, et al.: Study on the estimation of routine immunization coverage of China, 2005–2007. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2009, 15(4):363-6.
  • [6]Lei C, Huaqing W, Jingshan Z, Ping Y, Lingsheng C, Guomin Z, et al.: Coverage survey after expanded immunization program. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2012, 18(5):419-24.
  • [7]Orenstein WA, Bernier RH, Dondero TJ, Hinman AR, Marks JS, Bart KJ, et al.: Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Bull World Health Organ 1985, 63(6):1055-68.
  • [8]Gao J, Chen E, Wang Z, Shen J, He H, Ma H, et al.: Epidemic of measles following the nationwide mass immunization campaign. BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13:139. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [9]Liwei Z, Jianguo R, Yiren F, Haijun L, Shuxia L, Wei L, et al.: Evaluation measles mass campaign of NingXia Hui Autonomous Region in 2005. Med Ani Pre 2007, 23(11):820-2.
  • [10]Shuyan Z, Xiaofeng L, Dapeng Y, Xuedan Y, Biao G, Yibing T, et al.: Measles mass campaign experience and effect evaluation of Guizhou province, 2003–2004. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2006, 12(1):7-12.
  • [11]Uzicanin A, Eggers R, Webb E, Harris B, Durrheim D, Ogunbanjo G, et al.: Impact of the 1996–1997 supplementary measles vaccination campaigns in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol 2002, 31(5):968-76.
  • [12]Khetsuriani N, Deshevoi S, Goel A, Spika J, Martin R, Emiroglu N: Supplementary immunization activities to achieve measles elimination: experience of the European Region. J Infect Dis 2011, 204(Suppl 1):S343-52.
  • [13]Dabral M: Cost-effectiveness of supplementary immunization for measles in India. Indian Pediatr 2009, 46(11):957-62.
  • [14]Castillo-Solorzano CC, Matus CR, Flannery B, Marsigli C, Tambini G, Andrus JK: The Americas: paving the road toward global measles eradication. J Infect Dis 2011, 204(Suppl 1):S270-8.
  • [15]Parker Fiebelkorn A, Redd SB, Gallagher K, Rota PA, Rota J, Bellini W, et al.: Measles in the United States during the postelimination era. J Infect Dis 2010, 202(10):1520-8.
  • [16]Strebel PM, Henao-Restrepo AM, Hoekstra E, Olive JM, Papania MJ, Cochi SL: Global measles elimination efforts: the significance of measles elimination in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004, 189(Suppl 1):S251-7.
  • [17]Hinman AR, Orenstein WA, Papania MJ: Evolution of measles elimination strategies in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004, 189(Suppl 1):S17-22.
  • [18]Katz SL, Hinman AR: Summary and conclusions: measles elimination meeting, 16–17 March 2000. J Infect Dis 2004, 189(Suppl 1):S43-7.
  • [19]Conrad JL, Wallace R, Witte JJ: The epidemiologic rationale for the failure to eradicate measles in the United States. Am J Public Health 1971, 61(11):2304-10.
  • [20]Hu Y, Li Q, Luo S, Lou L, Qi X, Xie S: Timeliness vaccination of measles containing vaccine and barriers to vaccination among migrant children in East China. PLoS One 2013, 8(8):e73264.
  • [21]Chao M, Lixin H, Jin M, Yan Z, Lei C, Xiaofeng L, et al.: Measles epidemiological characteristics and progress of measles elimination in China, 2010. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2011, 17(3):242-5. (In Chinese)
  • [22]NHFPC C. Report on China’s migrant population development. 2013. [http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/ldrks/s7847/201309/12e8cf0459de42c981c59e827b87a27c.shtml] (Accessed on 23 Jan 2015).
  • [23]van den Hof S, Berbers GAM, de Melker HE, Conyn-van Spaendonck MAE: Sero-epidemiology of measles antibodies in the Netherlands, a cross-sectional study in a national sample and in communities with low vaccine coverage. Vaccine 1999, 18(9–10):931-40.
  • [24]DeSerres G, Joly JR, Fauvel M, Meyer F, Masse B, Boulianne N: Passive immunity against measles during the first 8 months of life of infants born to vaccinated mothers or to mothers who sustained measles. Vaccine 1997, 15(6–7):620-3.
  • [25]Janaszek W, Slusarczyk J: Immunity against measles in populations of women and infants in Poland. Vaccine 2003, 21(21–22):2948-53.
  • [26]Cutts FT, Izurieta HS, Rhoda DA: Measuring coverage in MNCH: design, implementation, and interpretation challenges associated with tracking vaccination coverage using household surveys. PLoS Med 2013, 10(5):e1001404.
  • [27]Orenstein WA: The role of measles elimination in development of a national immunization program. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006, 25(12):1093-101.
  • [28]Cohen BJ, Parry RP, Doblas D, Samuel D, Warrener L, Andrews N, et al.: Measles immunity testing: comparison of two measles IgG ELISAs with plaque reduction neutralisation assay. J Virol Methods 2006, 131(2):209-12.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:26次 浏览次数:11次