Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson’s disease

BMC Geriatrics

Jan Lexell¹  Maria H Nilsson²  Stina B Jonasson¹ 

[1] Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden;Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, PO Box 157, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden

关键词: Questionnaires;    Self efficacy;    Reliability of results;    Psychometrics;    Parkinson disease;   

Others  :  855039
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2318-14-66

 received in 2014-01-30, accepted in 2014-05-06,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Fear of falling (FOF) is commonly experienced in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is a predictor of recurrent falls, a barrier to physical exercise, and negatively associated with health-related quality of life. A variety of rating scales exist that assess different aspects of FOF but comprehensive head-to-head comparisons of their psychometric properties in people with PD are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of four FOF rating scales in people with PD. More specifically, we investigated and compared the scales’ data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, and reliability.

Methods

The FOF rating scales were: the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), the Swedish FES (FES(S)), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC), and the modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE). A postal survey was administered to 174 persons with PD. Responders received a second survey after two weeks.

Results

The mean (SD) age and PD duration of the 102 responders were 73 (8) and 7 (6) years, respectively. ABC had worse data completeness than the other scales (6.9 vs. 0.9–1.3% missing data). All scales had corrected item-total correlations exceeding 0.4 and showed acceptable reliabilities (Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) >0.80) but only FES-I had ICC >0.90. The standard error of measurements ranged from 7% (FES-I) to 12% (FES(S)), and the smallest detectable differences ranged from 20% (FES-I) to 33% (FES(S)) of the total score ranges. ABC and FES(S) had substantially more outliers than mSAFFE and FES-I (10 and 15 vs. 3 and 4, respectively) when the two test occasions were compared.

Conclusions

When assessing FOF in people with PD, the findings in the present study favoured the choice of FES-I or mSAFFE. However, FES-I was the only scale with ICC >0.90 which has been suggested as a minimum when using a scale for individual comparisons.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Jonasson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Suarez H, Geisinger D, Suarez A, Carrera X, Buzo R, Amorin I: Postural control and sensory perception in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2009, 129:354-360.
• [2]Mak MK, Pang MY: Parkinsonian single fallers versus recurrent fallers: different fall characteristics and clinical features. J Neurol 2010, 257:1543-1551.
• [3]Nilsson MH, Drake AM, Hagell P: Assessment of fall-related self-efficacy and activity avoidance in people with Parkinson’s disease. BMC Geriatr 2010, 10:78. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Grimbergen YA, Schrag A, Mazibrada G, Borm GF, Bloem BR: Impact of falls and fear of falling on health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2013, 3:409-413.
• [5]Mak MK, Pang MY: Fear of falling is independently associated with recurrent falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a 1-year prospective study. J Neurol 2009, 256:1689-1695.
• [6]Ellis T, Boudreau JK, DeAngelis TR, Brown LE, Cavanaugh JT, Earhart GM, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Dibble LE: Barriers to exercise in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 2013, 93:628-636.
• [7]Nilsson MH, Hariz GM, Iwarsson S, Hagell P: Walking ability is a major contributor to fear of falling in people with Parkinson’s disease: implications for rehabilitation. Parkinsons Dis 2012, 2012:713236.
• [8]Moore DS, Ellis R: Measurement of fall-related psychological constructs among independent-living older adults: a review of the research literature. Aging Ment Health 2008, 12:684-699.
• [9]Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C: Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005, 34:614-619.
• [10]Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L: Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol 1990, 45:P239-P243.
• [11]Powell LE, Myers AM: The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995, 50A:M28-M34.
• [12]Lachman ME, Howland J, Tennstedt S, Jette A, Assmann S, Peterson EW: Fear of falling and activity restriction: the survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly (SAFE). J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998, 53:P43-P50.
• [13]Yardley L, Smith H: A prospective study of the relationship between feared consequences of falling and avoidance of activity in community-living older people. Gerontologist 2002, 42:17-23.
• [14]Bladh S, Nilsson MH, Carlsson G, Lexell J: Content analysis of 4 fear of falling rating scales by linking to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. PM R 2013, 5:573-582. e571
• [15]Hobart J, Cano S: Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess 2009, 13:1-177.
• [16]Peretz C, Herman T, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N: Assessing fear of falling: can a short version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale be useful? Mov Disord 2006, 21:2101-2105.
• [17]Dal Bello-Haas V, Klassen L, Sheppard MS, Metcalfe A: Psychometric properties of activity, self-efficacy, and quality-of-life measures in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physiother Can 2011, 63:47-57.
• [18]Steffen T, Seney M: Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Phys Ther 2008, 88:733-746.
• [19]Lohnes CA, Earhart GM: External validation of abbreviated versions of the activities-specific balance confidence scale in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2010, 25:485-489.
• [20]Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012, 21:651-657.
• [21]Bladh S, Nilsson MH, Hariz GM, Westergren A, Hobart J, Hagell P: Psychometric performance of a generic walking scale (Walk-12G) in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2012, 259:729-738.
• [22]Nilsson MH, Bladh S, Hagell P: Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: measurement properties of a generic and a condition-specific rating scale. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013, 46:737-746.
• [23]Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483.
• [24]Hobson JP, Edwards NI, Meara RJ: The Parkinson’s disease activities of daily living scale: a new simple and brief subjective measure of disability in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Rehabil 2001, 15:241-246.
• [25]Nilsson MH, Hariz GM, Wictorin K, Miller M, Forsgren L, Hagell P: Development and testing of a self administered version of the freezing of gait questionnaire. BMC Neurol 2010, 10:85. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon ES, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn AD: Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2000, 6:165-170.
• [27]Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C: Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the prevention of falls network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005, 53:1618-1622.
• [28]Gray P, Hildebrand K: Fall risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Nurs 2000, 32:222-228.
• [29]Nordell E, Andreasson M, Gall K, Thorngren K-G: Evaluating the Swedish version of the falls efficacy scale-international (FES-I). Adv Physiother 2009, 11:81-87.
• [30]Hellstrom K, Lindmark B: Fear of falling in patients with stroke: a reliability study. Clin Rehabil 1999, 13:509-517.
• [31]Ware JE Jr, Gandek B: Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:945-952.
• [32]Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ: Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8:iii. 1–48
• [33]McHorney CA, Tarlov AR: Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995, 4:293-307.
• [34]Schuck P: Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res 2004, 13:571-586.
• [35]Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:420-428.
• [36]Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
• [37]Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust: Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002, 11:193-205.
• [38]Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
• [39]Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42.
• [40]Lexell JE, Downham DY: How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84:719-723.
• [41]Norman GR, Streiner DL: Biostatistics: the bare essentials. 3rd edition. Shelton, Conn: People’s Medical Pub. House; 2008.
• [42]Wirdefeldt K, Adami HO, Cole P, Trichopoulos D, Mandel J: Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence. Eur J Epidemiol 2011, 26(Suppl 1):S1-S58.
• [43]Muangpaisan W, Mathews A, Hori H, Seidel D: A systematic review of the worldwide prevalence and incidence of Parkinson’s disease. J Med Assoc Thai 2011, 94:749-755.
• [44]Bloem BR, Hausdorff JM, Visser JE, Giladi N: Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena. Mov Disord 2004, 19:871-884.
• [45]Allen NE, Canning CG, Sherrington C, Lord SR, Latt MD, Close JC, O’Rourke SD, Murray SM, Fung VS: The effects of an exercise program on fall risk factors in people with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord 2010, 25:1217-1225.
• [46]King MT: A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011, 11:171-184.