期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pediatrics
Beyond the clinic: improving child health through evidence-based community development
Alexander C Wagenaar1  Ryan J O’Mara1  Alexis L Delisle1  Amy L Tobler1  Kelli A Komro1 
[1]Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16th St, Rm 5285, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL 32610-01, USA
关键词: Review;    Evidence-based practice;    Policy;    Health promotion;    Adolescent;    Child;   
Others  :  1144380
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2431-13-172
 received in 2013-03-11, accepted in 2013-10-15,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Promoting child wellbeing necessarily goes beyond the clinic as risks to child health and development are embedded in the social and physical environmental conditions in which children live. Pediatricians play a vital role in promoting the health of children in the communities they serve and can maximize their impact by advocating for and supporting efficacious, evidence-based strategies in their communities.

Methods

To provide a succinct guide for community pediatric efforts to advance the wellbeing of all children and particularly disadvantaged children in a community, we conducted a theory-driven and structured narrative review to synthesize published systematic and meta-analytic reviews of policy-relevant, local-level strategies addressing potent and malleable influences on child health and development. An exhaustive list of policy-relevant, local-level strategies for improving child health was used to conduct a comprehensive search of recent (1990–2012), English language peer-reviewed published meta-analyses and systematic reviews in the 10 core databases of scientific literature. Our review of the literature encompassed six key conceptual domains of intervention foci, including distal influences of child health (i.e., income and resources, social cohesion, and physical environment) and proximal influences (i.e., family, school and peer). We examined intervention effects on four key domains of child health and development: cognitive development, social and emotional competence, psychological and behavioral wellbeing, and physical health.

Results

Published reviews were identified for 98 distinct policy-relevant community interventions, evaluated across 288 outcomes. We classified 46 strategies as meeting scientific criteria for efficacy by having consistent, positive outcomes from high-quality trials (e.g., tenant-based rental assistance, neighborhood watch programs, urban design and land use policies, access to quality childcare services, class size reductions, after-school programs that promote personal/social skills). Another 21 strategies were classified as having consistent evidence of positive outcomes from high-quality observational studies only, while 28 strategies had insufficient evidence available to assess their effectiveness based on published reviews. We did not limit the review to studies conducted in the United States, but the vast majority of them were U.S.-based, and the results therefore are most applicable to the U.S. context.

Conclusions

Based on our synthesis of published literature on community development strategies, we provide an illustration combining a comprehensive set of evidence-based strategies to promote child health and development across a wide-range of child health outcomes.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Komro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150330132032196.pdf 356KB PDF download
Figure 3. 67KB Image download
Figure 2. 98KB Image download
Figure 1. 74KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Feudtner C, Noonan KG: Poorer health: the persistent and protean connections between poverty, social inequality, and child well-being. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009, 163(7):668-670.
  • [2]Marmot M: The influence of income on health: views of an epidemiologist. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002, 21(2):31-46.
  • [3]Braveman P, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR, Pamuk E: Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell Us. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(1):s186-s196.
  • [4]Levine R, Foster J, Fullilove R, et al.: Black-white inequalities in mortality and life expectancy. Public Health Rep 2001, 116:477-483.
  • [5]Flores G, Fuentes-Afflick E, Barbot O, et al.: The health of Latino children: urgent priorities, unanswered questions, and a research agenda. Am Med Assoc 2002, 288(1):82-90.
  • [6]Diez Roux AV: Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health 2001, 91(11):1783-1789.
  • [7]Pickett K, Pearl M: Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2001, 55(2):111-122.
  • [8]National Research Council, Institute of Medicine: Preventing mental, emotional and behavioral disorders among young people: progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
  • [9]Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics: America’s Children in Brief: Key National Indicators of Well-being, 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2012.
  • [10]Adler NE, Rehkopf DH: US disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health 2008, 29:235-252.
  • [11]Commission to Build a Healthier America: Breaking Through on the Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: An approach to message translation. Princeton, New Jersey: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2009.
  • [12]Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
  • [13]US Department of Education: Promise Neighborhoods. 2012. http://www2.ed.gov/programs/promiseneighborhoods/index.html webcite. Accessed 12/14/12, 2012
  • [14]Harlem Children’s Zone: Harlem Children’s Zone. 2012. http://www.hcz.org webcite. Accessed December 14, 2012, 2012
  • [15]Komro KA, Flay BR, Biglan A, the Promise Neighborhoods Research Consoritum: Creating nurturing environments: a science-based framework for promoting child health and development within high-poverty neighborhoods. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2011, 14(2):111.
  • [16]Baron J: Applying evidence to social programs. The New York Times 2012. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/29/applying-evidence-to-social-programs/ webcite
  • [17]Haskins R, Baron J: Building the Connection between Policy and Evidence: The Obama evidene-based initiatives. London, England: Nesta; 2011.
  • [18]American Academy of Pediatrics: The Pediatrician’s role in community pediatrics. Pediatrics 2005, 115:1092-1094.
  • [19]Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA: Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(9):1576-1587.
  • [20]Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011.
  • [21]Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, et al.: Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services–methods. Am J Prev Med 2000, 18:35-43.
  • [22]Flay BR, Biglan A, Boruch RF, et al.: Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prev Sci 2005, 6(3):151-173.
  • [23]Heller DE: Student price response in higher education: an update to Leslie and brinkman. J High Educ 1997, 68(6):624-659.
  • [24]American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force: Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. Am Psychol 2008, 63(9):852-862.
  • [25]McGowan A, Hahn R, Liberman A, et al.: Effects on violence of laws and policies facilitating the transfer of juveniles from the juvenile justice system to the adult justice system: a systemic review. Am J Prev Med 2007, 32(4 Suppl):S7-S28.
  • [26]Lavis JN: How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med 2009, 6(11):e1000141.
  • [27]Berkman LF: Unintended consequences of social and economic policies for population health: towards a more intentional approach. Eur J Public Health 2011, 21(5):547-548.
  • [28]Stahl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K: Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Helsinki, Finland: Finland Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2006.
  • [29]Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL: A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008, 14:117-123.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:10次