Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care

BMC Medical Ethics

Reidar Pedersen¹  Marit Helene Hem¹  Bert Molewijk² 

[1] Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1130, Blindern NO-0318, Oslo, Norway;Department of Medical Humanities, Free University medical centre (VUmc), EMGO+ (Quality of Care), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Ethics;    Coercion;    Moral case deliberation;    Ethics reflection group;    Constructive disagreement;    Mental health care;    Clinical ethics support service;    Ethical challenges;   

Others  :  1229027
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6939-16-4

 received in 2014-07-03, accepted in 2015-01-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Little is known about how health care professionals deal with ethical challenges in mental health care, especially when not making use of a formal ethics support service. Understanding this is important in order to be able to support the professionals, to improve the quality of care, and to know in which way future ethics support services might be helpful.

Methods

Within a project on ethics, coercion and psychiatry, we executed a focus group interview study at seven departments with 65 health care professionals and managers. We performed a systematic and open qualitative analysis focusing on the question: ‘How do health care professionals deal with ethical challenges?’ We deliberately did not present a fixed definition or theory of ethical challenge.

Results

We categorized relevant topics into three subthemes: 1) Identification and presence of ethical challenges; 2) What do the participants actually do when dealing with an ethical challenge?; and 3) The significance of facing ethical challenges.

Results varied from dealing with ethical challenges every day and appreciating it as a positive part of working in mental health care, to experiencing ethical challenges as paralyzing burdens that cause a lot of stress and hinder constructive team cooperation. Some participants reported that they do not have the time and that they lack a specific methodology. Quite often, informal and retrospective ad-hoc meetings in small teams were organized. Participants struggled with what makes a challenge an ethical challenge and whether it differs from a professional challenge. When dealing with ethical challenges, a number of participants experienced difficulties handling disagreement in a constructive way. Furthermore, some participants plead for more attention for underlying intentions and justifications of treatment decisions.

Conclusions

The interviewed health care professionals dealt with ethical challenges in many different ways, often in an informal, implicit and reactive manner. This study revealed nine different categories of what health care professionals implicitly or explicitly conceive as ‘ethical challenges’. Future research should focus on how ethics support services, such as ethics reflection groups or moral case deliberation, can be of help with respect to dealing with ethical challenges and value disagreements in a constructive way.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Molewijk et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Thornton T. Essential. Philosophy of Mental Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
• [2]Dickenson D. In two minds. A case book in psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
• [3]Widdershoven G, MacMillan J, Hope T, Van der Scheer L. Empirical ethics in psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
• [4]Bloch S, Green SA. Psychiatric ethics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
• [5]Radden J. The virtuous psychiatrist: character ethics in psychiatric practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
• [6]Sadler JZ. Values and psychiatric diagnosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
• [7]Sailas ES, Fenton M. Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2000; 1: CD001163
• [8]Salize HJ, Dressing H. Coercion, involuntary treatment and quality of mental health care. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005; 18, 5:576-84.
• [9]Muralidharan S, Fenton M. Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2006; 3: CD002084
• [10]Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Preston NJ. Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2011; 2: CD004408
• [11]Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Whittington R. Evaluation of behavorial changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions. BMC Psychiatry. 2012; 12:54. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Cowden TL, Cummings GG. Nursing theory and concept development: a theoretical model of clinical nurses’ intentions to stay in their current positions. J Adv Nurs. 2012; 68(7):1646-57.
• [13]Molewijk B, Verkerk M, Milius H, Widdershoven G. Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Med Health Care and Philosophy. 2008; 11:43-56.
• [14]Molewijk B, Zadelhoff E, Lendemeijer B, Widdershoven G. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Bioethica Forum. 2008; 1:57-65.
• [15]Weidema F, Molewijk B, Kamsteeg F, Widdershoven G. Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Nurs Ethics. 2013; 6:617-31.
• [16]Landeweer E. Moral dynamics in mental health care. Fostering reflection and change regarding coercion and restraint. Amsterdam: Free University Medical Centre (VUmc), EMGO+; 2013.
• [17]DuVal G, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M. A national survey of U.S. internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(3):251-8.
• [18]Gjerberg E, Førde R, Pedersen R, Bollig G. Ethical challenges in the provision of end-of-life care in Norwegian nursing homes. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(4):677-84.
• [19]Lind M, Kaltiala-Heino R, Suominen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M. Nurses’ ethical perceptions about coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004; 11:379-85.
• [20]Teeri S, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M. Long-term nursing care of elderly people: identifying ethical problematic experiences among patients, relatives and nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2006; 2:116-29.
• [21]Hurst SA, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Førde R, Slowther AM et al.. Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. J Med Ethics. 2007; 33(1):51-7.
• [22]Hem MH, Molewijk B, Pedersen R. Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion. A focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:82. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Bremberg S, Nilstun T. The variety of ethical issues in everyday practice. Interviews with Swedish GPs. Eur J Gen Pract. 2001; 7:143-7.
• [24]Sorta-Bilajac I, Bazˇdaric K, Brozovic B, Agich GJ. Croatian physicians’ and nurses’ experience with ethical issues in clinical practice. J Med Ethics. 2008; 34:450-5.
• [25]Hunink G, Van Leeuwen R, Jansen M, Jochemsen H. Moral issues in mentoring sessions. Nurs Ethics. 2009; 16(4):487-98.
• [26]Hurst SA, Hull SC, DuVal G, Danis M. How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(1):7-14.
• [27]Lillemoen L, Pedersen R. Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in primary health care. Nurs Ethics. 2013; 20(1):96-108.
• [28]Appelbaum PS, Reiser SJ. Ethics rounds: a model for teaching ethics in the psychiatric setting. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1981; 32(8):555-60.
• [29]Hem MH, Pedersen R, Norvoll R, Molewijk B. Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental health care. A systematic literature review. Nursing Ethics. 2014. Epub ahead of print
• [30]Lillemoen L, Pedersen R. Ethics in municipal health services: working systematically with, and developing competence in ethics. Clinical Ethics. 2013; 8:19-28.
• [31]Weidema F. Dialogue at work. Implementing moral case deliberation in a mental health care institution. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Free University Medical Centre; 2014.
• [32]Dauwerse L, Weidema F, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in the Netherlands: a mixed methods overview study. HEC Forum. 2014; 26(2):95-109.
• [33]Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1997.
• [34]Kidd PS. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2000; 10:293-308.
• [35]Morgan D, Fellows C, Guevara H. Emergent approaches to focus group research. In: Handbook of emergent methods. Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P, editors. New York: The Guildford Press; 2008: p.207-20.
• [36]Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE publications; 1994.
• [37]Stake RE. Qualitative case studies. In: The sage handbook of qualitative research. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005: p.443-66.
• [38]Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews. Sage, Los Angeles, CA: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing; 2009.
• [39]Førde R, Pedersen R. Clinical ethics committees in Norway. What do they do and does it makes a difference? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011; 20:398-395.
• [40]Donaldson T, Fistein E, Dunn M. Case-based ethics seminars in medical ethics education: how medical students define and discuss moral problems. J Med Ethics. 2010; 36(12):816-20.
• [41]Pelto-Piri V, Engström K, Engström I. Staffs’ perceptions of the ethical landscape in psychiatric inpatient care - a qualitative content analysis of ethical diaries. Clinical Ethics. 2014; 1:45-52.
• [42]DuVal G, Sartorius L, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M. What triggers requests for ethics consultations? J Med Ethics. 2001; 27(suppl I):i24-9.
• [43]Reiter-Theil S. The Freiburg approach to ethics consultation: process, outcome and competencies. J Med Ethics. 2001; 27(suppl I):i21-3.
• [44]Lϋtzén K, Cronqvist A, Magnusson A, Andersson L. Moral stress: synthesis of a concept. Nurs Ethics. 2003; 10:312-22.
• [45]Kälvemark S, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, Westerholm P, Arnetz B. Living with conflicts. Ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58:1075-84.
• [46]Laursen B, Hafen C. Future directions in the study of close relationships: conflict is bad (except when it’s not). Soc Dev. 2010; 19(4):858-72.
• [47]Kellermanns FW, Floyd SW, Pearson AW, Spencer B. The contingent effect of constructive confrontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decisional quality. J Organiz Behav. 2007; 29:119-37.
• [48]Schippers MC, Den Hartog D, Koopman PL. Reflexivity in teams: a measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: an international review. 2007; 56(2):189-211.
• [49]Schippers MCC, West MA, Dawson JF. Team reflexivity and innovation: the moderating role of team context. J Manag. 2012. (E-publication online: http://jom. sagepub.com/content/early/2012/04/16/0149206312441210.full.pdf+html webcite; accessed 13th of January 2015); 0149206312441210. First published on April 17, 2012