期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genomics
Transcriptome differences in the hypopharyngeal gland between Western Honeybees (Apis mellifera) and Eastern Honeybees (Apis cerana)
Zhi-Jiang Zeng1  Wei-Yu Yan1  Xiao-Bo Wu1  Qiu-Hong Qin1  Liu-Qing Tian1  Zi-Long Wang1  Hao Liu1 
[1] Honeybee Research Institute, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, China
关键词: Differentially expressed gene;    Digital gene expression;    Hypopharyngeal gland;    Apis cerana;    Apis mellifera;   
Others  :  1141053
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2164-15-744
 received in 2014-04-14, accepted in 2014-08-26,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Apis mellifera and Apis cerana are two sibling species of Apidae. Apis cerana is adept at collecting sporadic nectar in mountain and forest region and exhibits stiffer hardiness and acarid resistance as a result of natural selection, whereas Apis mellifera has the advantage of producing royal jelly. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that affect the development of hypopharyngeal gland (HG) and/or the secretion of royal jelly between these two honeybee species, we performed a digital gene expression (DGE) analysis of the HGs of these two species at three developmental stages (newly emerged worker, nurse and forager).

Results

Twelve DGE-tag libraries were constructed and sequenced using the total RNA extracted from the HGs of newly emerged workers, nurses, and foragers of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana. Finally, a total of 1482 genes in Apis mellifera and 1313 in Apis cerana were found to exhibit an expression difference among the three developmental stages. A total of 1417 DEGs were identified between these two species. Of these, 623, 1072, and 462 genes showed an expression difference at the newly emerged worker, nurse, and forager stages, respectively. The nurse stage exhibited the highest number of DEGs between these two species and most of these were found to be up-regulated in Apis mellifera. These results suggest that the higher yield of royal jelly in Apis mellifera may be due to the higher expression level of these DEGs.

Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the DEGs between the HGs of two sibling honeybee species (Apis mellifera and Apis cerana). Our results indicated that the gene expression difference was associated with the difference in the royal jelly yield between these two species. These results provide an important clue for clarifying the mechanisms underlying hypopharyngeal gland development and the production of royal jelly.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150325195018727.pdf 1320KB PDF download
Figure 6. 79KB Image download
Figure 5. 28KB Image download
Figure 4. 79KB Image download
20150128182515689.pdf 176KB PDF download
Figure 2. 135KB Image download
Figure 1. 55KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Wu J: Honeybee Biology. In Apiology. 1st edition. Edited by Yan JC, Xiao B. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press; 2012:8-90.
  • [2]Kubo T, Sasaki M, Nakamura J, Sasagawa H, Ohashi K, Takeuchi H, Natori S: Change in the expression of hypopharyngeal-gland proteins of the worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) with age and/or role. J Biochem 1996, 119(2):291-295.
  • [3]Ohashi K, Natori S, Kubo T: Expression of amylase and glucose oxidase in the hypopharyngeal gland with an age-dependent role change of the worker honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Eur J Biochem 1999, 265(1):127-133.
  • [4]Ohashi K, Natori S, Kubo T: Change in the mode of gene expression of the hypopharyngeal gland cells with an age-dependent role change of the worker honeybee Apis mellifera L. Eur J Biochem 1997, 249(3):797-802.
  • [5]Ohashi K, Sasaki M, Sasagawa H, Nakamura J, Natori S, Kubo T: Functional flexibility of the honey bee hypopharyngeal gland in a dequeened colony. Zoolog Sci 2000, 17(8):1089-1094.
  • [6]Ohashi K, Sawata M, Takeuchi H, Natori S, Kubo T: Molecular cloning of cDNA and analysis of expression of the gene for alpha-glucosidase from the hypopharyngeal gland of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996, 221(2):380-385.
  • [7]Santos KS, dos Santos LD, Mendes MA, de Souza BM, Malaspina O, Palma MS: Profiling the proteome complement of the secretion from hypopharyngeal gland of Africanized nurse-honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2005, 35(1):85-91.
  • [8]Feng M, Fang Y, Li J: Proteomic analysis of honeybee worker (Apis mellifera) hypopharyngeal gland development. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:645. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [9]Li JK, Feng M, Begna D, Fang Y, Zheng AJ: Proteome comparison of hypopharyngeal gland development between Italian and royal jelly producing worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Proteome Res 2010, 9(12):6578-6594.
  • [10]Liu Z, Ji T, Yin L, Shen J, Shen F, Chen G: Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the regulation of the hypopharyngeal glands in the honey bee, Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann. PLoS One 2013, 8(12):e81001.
  • [11]Cheng SL: Special Management of Apis cerana cerana. In The Apicultural Science in China. 1st edition. Edited by Liu BH. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press; 2001:488-512.
  • [12]Zeng ZJ, Xi FG, Wen ZZ, Li YG: Morphology study of the Apis mellifera and Apis cerana hypopharyngeal gland. Apiculture of China 1990, 5:6-7.
  • [13]Fang Y, Feng M, Li JK: Royal jelly proteome comparison between A. mellifera ligustica and A. cerana cerana. J Proteome Res 2010, 9(5):2207-2215.
  • [14]Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium: Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature 2006, 443(7114):931-949.
  • [15]Janecek S, Baláz S: Alpha-Amylases and approaches leading to their enhanced stability. FEBS Lett 1992, 304(1):1-3.
  • [16]Chiba S: Molecular mechanism in alpha-glucosidase and glucoamylase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1997, 61(8):1233-1239.
  • [17]Kamakura M: Royalactin induces queen differentiation in honeybees. Nature 2011, 473(7348):478-483.
  • [18]Schmitzová J, Klaudiny J, Albert S, Schröder W, Schreckengost W, Hanes J, Júdová J, Simúth J: A family of major royal jelly proteins of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998, 54(9):1020-1030.
  • [19]Albert S, Bhattacharya D, Klaudiny J, Schmitzová J, Simúth J: The family of major royal jelly proteins and its evolution. J Mol Evol 1999, 49(2):290-297.
  • [20]Albert S, Klaudiny J, Simúth J: Molecular characterization of MRJP3, highly polymorphic protein of honeybee (Apis mellifera) royal jelly. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 1999, 29(5):427-434.
  • [21]Kucharski R, Maleszka R, Hayward DC, Ball EE: A royal jelly protein is expressed in a subset of Kenyon cells in the mushroom bodies of the honey bee brain. Naturwissenschaften 1998, 85(7):343-346.
  • [22]Hojo M, Kagami T, Sasaki T, Nakamura J, Sasaki M: Reduced expression of major royal jelly protein 1 gene in the mushroom bodies of worker honeybees with reduced learning ability. Apidologie 2010, 41(2):194-202.
  • [23]Garcia L, Saraiva Garcia CH, Calábria LK, Costa Nunes da Cruz G, Sánchez Puentes A, Báo SN, Fontes W, Ricart CA, Salmen Espindola F, Valle de Sousa M: Proteomic analysis of honey bee brain upon ontogenetic and behavioral development. J Proteome Res 2009, 8(3):1464-1473.
  • [24]Drapeau MD, Albert S, Kucharski R, Prusko C, Maleszka R: Evolution of the Yellow/Major Royal Jelly Protein family and the emergence of social behavior in honey bees. Genome Res 2006, 16(11):1385-1394.
  • [25]Peiren N, Vanrobaeys F, de Graaf DC, Devreese B, Van Beeumen J, Jacobs FJ: The protein composition of honeybee venom reconsidered by a proteomic approach. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005, 1752(1):1-5.
  • [26]Peiren N, de Graaf DC, Vanrobaeys F, Danneels EL, Devreese B, Van Beeumen J, Jacobs FJ: Proteomic analysis of the honey bee worker venom gland focusing on the mechanisms of protection against tissue damage. Toxicon 2008, 52(1):72-83.
  • [27]Blank S, Bantleon FI, McIntyre M, Ollert M, Spillner E: The major royal jelly proteins 8 and 9 (Api m 11) are glycosylated components of Apis mellifera venom with allergenic potential beyond carbohydrate-based reactivity. Clin Exp Allergy 2012, 42(6):976-985.
  • [28]Bhavsar RB, Makley LN, Tsonis PA: The other lives of ribosomal proteins. Hum Genomics 2010, 4(5):327-344. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [29]Hafen E: Interplay between growth factor and nutrient signaling: lessons from Drosophila TOR. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2004, 279:153-167.
  • [30]Ikushima H, Miyazono K: Biology of transforming growth factor-β signaling. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2011, 12(12):2099-2107.
  • [31]Tarazona S, García-Alcalde F, Dopazo J, Ferrer A, Conesa A: Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth. Genome Res 2011, 21(12):2213-2223.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:18次 浏览次数:9次