期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
The usefulness of “corrected” body mass index vs. self-reported body mass index: comparing the population distributions, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility of three correction equations using Canadian population-based data
Lindsay McLaren1  Daniel J Dutton1 
[1] Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
关键词: Correction;    Bias;    Self-report;    Overweight;    Obesity;    Measurement error;    Body mass index;   
Others  :  1131452
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-430
 received in 2013-12-02, accepted in 2014-04-25,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

National data on body mass index (BMI), computed from self-reported height and weight, is readily available for many populations including the Canadian population. Because self-reported weight is found to be systematically under-reported, it has been proposed that the bias in self-reported BMI can be corrected using equations derived from data sets which include both self-reported and measured height and weight. Such correction equations have been developed and adopted. We aim to evaluate the usefulness (i.e., distributional similarity; sensitivity and specificity; and predictive utility vis-à-vis disease outcomes) of existing and new correction equations in population-based research.

Methods

The Canadian Community Health Surveys from 2005 and 2008 include both measured and self-reported values of height and weight, which allows for construction and evaluation of correction equations. We focused on adults age 18–65, and compared three correction equations (two correcting weight only, and one correcting BMI) against self-reported and measured BMI. We first compared population distributions of BMI. Second, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported BMI and corrected BMI against measured BMI. Third, we compared the self-reported and corrected BMI in terms of association with health outcomes using logistic regression.

Results

All corrections outperformed self-report when estimating the full BMI distribution; the weight-only correction outperformed the BMI-only correction for females in the 23–28 kg/m2 BMI range. In terms of sensitivity/specificity, when estimating obesity prevalence, corrected values of BMI (from any equation) were superior to self-report. In terms of modelling BMI-disease outcome associations, findings were mixed, with no correction proving consistently superior to self-report.

Conclusions

If researchers are interested in modelling the full population distribution of BMI, or estimating the prevalence of obesity in a population, then a correction of any kind included in this study is recommended. If the researcher is interested in using BMI as a predictor variable for modelling disease, then both self-reported and corrected BMI result in biased estimates of association.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Dutton and McLaren; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150302094139911.pdf 445KB PDF download
Figure 2. 45KB Image download
Figure 1. 43KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Must A, Evans EW: The Epidemiology of Obesity. In The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Obesity. Edited by Cawley J. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:9.
  • [2]Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ: Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 348(17):1625-1638.
  • [3]Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, Marks JS: Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003, 289(1):76-79.
  • [4]Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A, Spadano JL, Laird N, Dietz WH, Rimm E, Colditz GA: Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period. Arch Intern Med 2001, 161(13):1581-1586.
  • [5]Visscher TL, Seidell JC: The public health impact of obesity. Annu Rev Public Health 2001, 22:355-375.
  • [6]Anis AH, Zhang W, Bansback N, Guh DP, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL: Obesity and overweight in Canada: an updated cost-of-illness study. Obes Rev 2009, 11(1):31-40.
  • [7]Rothman KJ: BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008, 32(Suppl 3):S56-S59.
  • [8]Elgar FJ, Stewart JM: Validity of self-report screening for overweight and obesity. evidence from the Canadian community health survey. Can J Public Health 2008, 99(5):423-427.
  • [9]Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B: A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2007, 8(4):307-326.
  • [10]World Health Organization: Obesity and Overweight Fact Sheet. [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html webcite]
  • [11]Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M: Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 2001, 101(1):28-34.
  • [12]Rowland ML: Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr 1990, 52(6):1125-1133.
  • [13]Villanueva EV: The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2001, 1:11. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merlo J, Lundqvist-Persson C, Rastam L, Lindblad U: The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007, 15(1):197-208.
  • [15]Niedhammer I, Bugel I, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Leclerc A: Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24(9):1111-1118.
  • [16]Engstrom JL, Paterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL: Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003, 48(5):338-345.
  • [17]Ezzati M, Martin H, Skjold S, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ: Trends in national and state-level obesity in the USA after correction for self-report bias: analysis of health surveys. J R Soc Med 2006, 99(5):250-257.
  • [18]Yun S, Zhu BP, Black W, Brownson RC: A comparison of national estimates of obesity prevalence from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006, 30(1):164-170.
  • [19]Chang VW, Christakis NA: Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards. J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16(8):538-543.
  • [20]Connor Gorber S, Shields M, Tremblay MS, McDowell I: The feasibility of establishing correction factors to adjust self-reported estimates of obesity. Health Rep 2008, 19(3):71-82.
  • [21]Shields M, Gorber SC, Janssen I, Tremblay MS: Bias in self-reported estimates of obesity in Canadian health surveys: an update on correction equations for adults. Health Rep 2011, 22(3):35-45.
  • [22]Kuskowska-Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Bostrom G: Relationship between questionnaire data and medical records of height, weight and body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992, 16(1):1-9.
  • [23]Hayes AJ, Clarke PM, Lung TW: Change in bias in self-reported body mass index in Australia between 1995 and 2008 and the evaluation of correction equations. Popul Health Metr 2011, 9:53-7954-9-53.
  • [24]Jain RB: Regression models to predict corrected weight, height and obesity prevalence from self-reported data: data from BRFSS 1999–2007. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010, 34(11):1655-1664.
  • [25]Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ: Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5(4):561-565.
  • [26]Stommel M, Schoenborn CA: Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001–2006. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:421-2458-9-421.
  • [27]Stommel M, Osier N: Temporal changes in bias of body mass index scores based on self-reported height and weight. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013, 37(3):461-467.
  • [28]Gorber SC, Tremblay MS: The bias in self-reported obesity from 1976 to 2005: a Canada-US comparison. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010, 18(2):354-361.
  • [29]Canada S: Health Statistics Division: Canadian Community Health Survey, User Guide for the Public Use Microdata File. 2005.
  • [30]Durbin J: Errors in variables. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique/Rev Int Stat Inst 1954, 22:23-32.
  • [31]Shiely F, Hayes K, Perry IJ, Kelleher CC: Height and weight bias: the influence of time. PLoS One 2013, 8(1):e54386.
  • [32]Orpana HM, Berthelot JM, Kaplan MS, Feeny DH, McFarland B, Ross NA: BMI and mortality: results from a national longitudinal study of Canadian adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010, 18(1):214-218.
  • [33]Janssen I, Bacon E, Pickett W: Obesity and its relationship with occupational injury in the canadian workforce. J Obes 2011, 2011:531403.
  • [34]Barberio A, McLaren L: Occupational physical activity and body mass index (BMI) among Canadian adults: does physical activity at work help to explain the socio-economic patterning of body weight? Can J Public Health 2011, 102(3):169-173.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:24次 浏览次数:21次