期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
Participant evaluation of an education module on interprofessional collaboration for students in healthcare studies
Paul Van Royen5  Herman Meulemans1  Steven Truijen2  Nadine Callewaert3  Olaf Timmermans4  Giannoula Tsakitzidis5 
[1] Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa;Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;Department of Health Sciences, Artesis-Plantijn University College of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;HZ University of Applied Sciences, Vlissingen, The Netherlands;Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词: Healthcare;    Education;    Collaborate;    Interprofessional;   
Others  :  1233384
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-015-0477-0
 received in 2014-10-24, accepted in 2015-10-23,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Interprofessional collaboration is considered a key-factor to deliver the highest quality of care. Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) assumes a model of working together, in particular with awareness of the process of interprofessional collaboration, to develop an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the client/family/population. Educational modules are developed in response to a perceived need to improve interprofessional collaboration for the benefit of patientcare. Up until 2005 no explicit module on interprofessional collaboration existed in the education programs of the Antwerp University Association (AUHA). During a decade the ‘Interprofessional Collaboration In Healthcare (IPCIHC) – module’ is organised and evaluated by its participants.

Methods

One group, post-test design was used to gather data from the participating students using a structured questionnaire. Data was collected between March 2005 and March 2014 from participating final year students in healthcare educational programs.

Results

3568 (84 % overall response) students evaluated the IPCIHC module from 2005 up to 2014. Over 80 % of the participants were convinced the IPCIHC increased their knowledge and changed their understanding that it will impact their future professional relationships, and felt a greater understanding about problem-solving in healthcare teams. Even though the results indicate that the goals of the IPCIHC module were achieved, less than 60 % of the participants experienced a change in attitude towards other professional groups.

Conclusions

Despite the positive outcomes from the participants, the challenge still remains to keep on educating future healthcare providers in interprofessional collaboration in order to achieve an increase in interprofessional behaviour towards other professional groups. Research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of undergraduate programs on the quality and safety of patientcare in practice.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Tsakitzidis et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20151120035945574.pdf 765KB PDF download
Fig. 3. 95KB Image download
Fig. 2. 13KB Image download
Fig. 1. 45KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Flexner A, Pritchet H, Henry S. Medical education in the United States and Canada bulletin number Four (The Flexner Report). The Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. 1910.
  • [2]Frenk J. The global health system: strengthening national health systems as the next step for global progress. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(1):e1000089.
  • [3]Van Marck, E, Van Meel P. Research on the modalities of cooperation with institutes of higher education in the province of Antwerp with a view to increase the quality of its health care. Publisher: University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine: Antwerp; 2003.
  • [4]McCallin A. Pluralistic dialoguing: a theory of interdisciplinary team working. Grounded Theory Rev. 2004; 4:1.
  • [5]Barr H. Interprofessional education today, yesterday and tomorrow. A review. The UK Centre for the advancement of interprofessional education: Antwerp; 2002.
  • [6]Gilbert JHV. Interprofessional education for collaborative patient centred practice. Nurs Leadersh. 2005; 18(2):32-8.
  • [7]Leathard A. Interprofessional collaboration. From policy to practice in health and social care. Routeledge Taylor & francis group, London and New York; 2003.
  • [8]D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005; 9 Suppl 1:8-20.
  • [9]Vinicor F. Interdisciplinary and intersectoral approach: a challenge for integrated care. Patient Educ Couns. 1995; 26:267-72.
  • [10]Boaden N, Leaviss J. Putting teamwork in context. Med Educ. 2000; 34(11):921-7.
  • [11]Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth D. Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption & evidence. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2005.
  • [12]Walsh CL, Gordon MF, Marshall M, Wilson F, Hunt T. Interprofessional capability: A developing framework for interprofessional education. Nurse Educ Pract. 2005; 5(4):230-7.
  • [13]Pollard K, Rickaby C, Miers M. Evaluating student learning in an interprofessional curriculum: The relevance of pre-qualifying interprofessional education for future professional practice. Report for the Higher Education Academy Health Science and Practice Subject Centre, London; 2008.
  • [14]Tsakitzidis G, Van Royen P. To learn to collaborate interprofesisonally in health care. Standaard uitgeverij Professional: Antwerp; 2012.
  • [15]Hunter J, Watt-Watson J, McGillion M, Raman-Wilms L, Cockburn L, Lax L, et al. An interfaculty pain curriculum: lessons learned from six years experience. Pain. 2008;140(1):74–86.
  • [16]CAIPE. Interprofessional education: a definition. 2002. Available from:. http://www. caipe.org.uk/about-us/the-definition-and-principles-of-interprofessional-education/ webcite
  • [17]Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: factors, processes and outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2005; 19 Suppl 1:39-48.
  • [18]Fry R, Robin I, Plovnick M. Dynamics of groups that execute or manage policy. Groups at work. Payne RC, editor. John Wiley & sons, New York; 1981.
  • [19]De Meuse K. Driving team effectiveness. 2009. Available from: http://www. kornferry.com/media/lominger_pdf/teamswhitepaper080409.pdf
  • [20]Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990; 65(9 Suppl):S63-7.
  • [21]Barr H, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S. Evaluations of interprofessional education: a United Kingdom review for health and social care. London: BERA/CAIPE; 2000.
  • [22]Molyneux J. Interprofessional teamworking: what makes teams work well? J Interprof Care. 2001; 15(1):29-35.
  • [23]WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2015. Available from:. http://www. who.int/classifications/icf/en/ webcite
  • [24]Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, Washington; 2011.
  • [25]Frank J, Jalbour M. Report of the CanMeds Phase IV Working groups. the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Otawa; 2005.
  • [26]Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977; 196(4286):129-36.
  • [27]Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(7):1087-110.
  • [28]Parsell G, Spalding R, Bligh J. Shared goals, shared learning: evaluation of a multiprofessional course for undergraduate students. Med Educ. 1998; 32(3):304-11.
  • [29]Barr H, Low H. Interprofessional education in pre-registration courses. CAIPE; 2012.
  • [30]CAIPE. centre for the advancement of interprofessional education. 2014; Available from:. http://www. caipe.org.uk/ webcite
  • [31]Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 3:CD000072.
  • [32]Van Durme T, Macq J, Anthierens S, Symons L, Schmitz O, Paulus D et al.. Stakeholders’ perception on the organization of chronic care: a SWOT analysis to draft avenues for health care reforms. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:179. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [33]Tsakitzidis G, Philips H. Interdisciplinair overleg. Is er nood aan opleiding over samenwerken? (Interdisciplinary dialogue. Is there a need for training on working together?). Huisarts Nu. 2013; 42(6):291-4.
  • [34]Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD002213.
  • [35]Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an exert panel. Interprofessional Education Collaborative, Washington; 2011.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:39次 浏览次数:49次