Online Pestkoppenstoppen: systematic and theory-based development of a web-based tailored intervention for adolescent cyberbully victims to combat and prevent cyberbullying

BMC Public Health

Lilian Lechner¹  Francine Dehue¹  Trijntje Völlink¹  Niels CL Jacobs¹ 

[1] Faculty of Psychology, Open University, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands

关键词: Intervention Mapping;    Behavior change;    Computer tailoring;    E-health;    Web-based;    Intervention;    (Cyber) bullying;   

Others  :  1131486
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-396

 received in 2014-03-31, accepted in 2014-04-09,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The purpose of this article is to give an integrative insight into the theoretical and empirical-based development of the Online Pestkoppenstoppen (Stop Bullies Online/Stop Online Bullies). This intervention aims to reduce the number of cyberbully victims and their symptoms of depression and anxiety (program goal), by teaching cyberbully victims how to cope in an adequate and effective manner with cyberbully incidents (program’s outcomes).

Method/Design

In developing the program the different steps of the Intervention Mapping protocol are systematically used. In this article we describe each step of Intervention Mapping. Sources used for the development were a literature review, a Delphi study among experts, focus group interviews with the target group, and elements from a proven effective anti-bullying program. The result is a fully automated web-based tailored intervention for cyberbully victims (12-15 years) consisting of three web-based advice sessions delivered over three months. The first advice aims to teach participants how behavior is influenced by the thoughts they have, how to recognize and dispute irrational thoughts and how to form rational thoughts. In the second advice, participants will learn about the way bullying emerges, how their behavior influences bullying and how they can use effective coping strategies in order to stop (online) bullying. In the third advice, participants receive feedback and will learn how to use the Internet and mobile phones in a safe manner. Each advice is tailored to the participant’s personal characteristics (e.g., personality, self-efficacy, coping strategies used and (ir)rational thoughts). To ensure implementation of the program after testing it for effectiveness, the intervention was pretested in the target-population and an implementation plan was designed. Finally, we will elaborate on the planned randomized controlled trial in which the intervention will be compared to a general information group and waiting list control group. This evaluation will provide insight into the intervention’s efficacy to reduce cyberbullying and its negative effects.

Discussion

Intervention Mapping is a time consuming but profound way to ensure that each step of developing an intervention is taken, and resulted in three web-based tailored pieces of advices that teach adolescents how to cope more effectively with cyberbullying experiences.

Trial registration

NTR3613, 14-09-2012

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Jacobs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gross EF: Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. J Appl Dev Psychol 2004, 25(6):633-649.
• [2]Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008, 49(4):376-385.
• [3]Tokunaga RS: Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 2010, 26(3):277-287.
• [4]Perren S, Dooley J, Shaw T, Cross D: Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiat Ment Health 2010, 4(1):1-10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ: Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004, 45(7):1308-1316.
• [6]Campbell M, Spears B, Slee P, Butler D, Kift S: Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation. Emotional Behav Difficulties 2012, 17(3–4):389-401.
• [7]Hinduja S, Patchin JW: Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res 2010, 14(3):206-221.
• [8]Schneider SK, O'Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RWS: Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health 2012, 102(1):171-177.
• [9]Beran T, Li Q: The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. J Stud Wellbeing 2007, 1(2):15-33.
• [10]Katzer C, Fetchenhauer D, Belschak F: Cyberbullying: who are the victims? a comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school. J Media Psychol 2009, 21(1):25-36.
• [11]Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD: Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol 2007, 43(3):564-575.
• [12]Ybarra ML: Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular internet users. Cyber Psychol Behav 2004, 7(2):247-257.
• [13]Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D: Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics 2006, 118(4):e1169-e1177.
• [14]Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D: Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics 2007, 118(4):1169-1177.
• [15]Beran T, Li Q: Cyber-harassment: a study of a new method for an old behavior. J Educ Comput Res 2005, 32(3):265-277.
• [16]Lewinsohn PM, Hops H, Roberts RE, Seeley JR, Andrews JA: Adolescent psychopathology: i prevalence and incidence of depression and other dsm-iii-r disorders in high school students. J Abnorm Psychol 1993, 102(1):133-144.
• [17]Schoffstall CL, Cohen R: Cyber aggression: The relation between online offenders and offline social competence. Soc Dev 2011, 20(3):587-604.
• [18]Låftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V: Cyberbullying and subjective health: A large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev 2013, 35(1):112-119.
• [19]Slonje R, Smith PK, Frisén A: The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput Hum Behav 2013, 29(1):26-32.
• [20]Paul S, Smith PK, Blumberg HH: Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Pastoral Care in Educ 2012, 30(2):127-146.
• [21]Snakenborg J, Van Acker R, Gable RA: Cyberbullying: Prevention and Intervention to Protect Our Children and Youth. Prev Sch Fail 2011, 55(2):88-95.
• [22]Patchin JW, Hinduja S: Traditional and Nontraditional Bullying Among Youth: A Test of General Strain Theory. Youth Soc 2011, 43(2):727-751.
• [23]Tenenbaum LS, Varjas K, Meyers J, Parris L: Coping strategies and perceived effectiveness in fourth through eighth grade victims of bullying. Sch Psychol Int 2011, 32(3):263-287.
• [24]Olweus D: Invited expert discussion paper Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? Eur J Dev Psychol 2012, 9(5):1-19.
• [25]Hinduja S, Patchin JW: Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization. Deviant Behav 2008, 29(2):129-156.
• [26]Hemphill SA, Kotevski A, Tollit M, Smith R, Herrenkohl TI, Toumbourou JW, Catalano RF: Longitudinal Predictors of Cyber and Traditional Bullying Perpetration in Australian Secondary School Students. J Adolesc Health 2012, 51(1):59-65.
• [27]Casas JA, Del Rey R, Ortega-Ruiz R: Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Comput Hum Behav 2013, 29(3):580-587.
• [28]Ang RP, Goh DH: Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2010, 41(4):387-397.
• [29]Barlińska J, Szuster A, Winiewski M: Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. J Commun Applied Social Psychol 2013, 23:37-51.
• [30]Slonje R, Smith PK: Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 2008, 49(2):147-154.
• [31]Ahlfors R: Many Sources, One Theme: Analysis of Cyberbullying Prevention and Intervention Websites. J Soc Sci 2010, 6(4):515-522.
• [32]Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K: Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010.
• [33]Webb M, Burns J, Collin P: Providing online support for young people with mental health difficulties: challenges and opportunities explored. Early Interv Psychiatry 2008, 2(2):108-113.
• [34]Havas J, de Nooijer J, Crutzen R, Feron F: Adolescents' views about an internet platform for adolescents with mental health problems. Health Educ 2011, 111(3):164-176.
• [35]Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, Weerdt I, Vries H: Efficacy and Use of an Internet-delivered Computer-tailored Lifestyle Intervention, Targeting Saturated Fat Intake, Physical Activity and Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Behav Med 2008, 35(2):125-135.
• [36]Cobiac J, Vos T, Barendregt J: Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study. PLoS Med 2009, 6(7):e1000110.
• [37]De Vries H, Brug J: Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: Introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999, 36(2):99-195.
• [38]Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007, 133(4):673-693.
• [39]Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS: A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010, 51(3–4):214-221.
• [40]Brug J, Oenema A, Kroeze W, Raat H: The internet and nutrition education: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005, 59:S130-S139.
• [41]Smith PK, Salmivalli C, Cowie H: Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a commentary. J Exp Criminol 2012, 8(4):433-441.
• [42]Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M: From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques. Appl Psychol 2008, 57(4):660-680.
• [43]Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S: Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010, 12(1):e4.
• [44]Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernández ME: Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
• [45]Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health Program Planning: An Educational And Ecological Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
• [46]van der Vegt AL, den Blanken M, Jepma I: Nationale scholierenmonitor: meting voorjaar 2007. Onderwijsvernieuwingenrosernl 2007. http://www.hetccv.nl/dossiers/geweld-op-school/landelijk---nationale-scholierenmonitor-2007 webcite
• [47]Walrave M, Heirman W: Cyberbullying: Predicting Victimisation and Perpetration. Child Soc 2011, 25(1):59-72.
• [48]Wade A, Beran T: Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. Can J Sch Psychol 2011, 26(1):44-61.
• [49]Gavin LA, Furman W: Age differences in adolescents' perceptions of their peer groups. Dev Psychol 1989, 25(5):827.
• [50]Faber M, Verkerk G, van Aken M, Lissenburg L, Geerlings M: Plezier op school: sterker naar de brugklas. Kind en Adolescent Praktijk 2006, 5(1):31-39.
• [51]Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
• [52]Craig W, Pepler D, Blais J: Responding to bullying: what works. Sch Psychol Int 2007, 28(4):465-477.
• [53]Kowalski RM, Limber SP, Agatston PW: Cyber Bullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
• [54]Mahady Wilton MM, Craig WM, Pepler DJ: Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Soc Dev 2000, 9(2):226-245.
• [55]Kristensen SM, Smith PK: The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying. Scand J Psychol 2003, 44:479-488.
• [56]Bijttebier P, Vertommen H: Coping with peer arguments in school-age children with bully/vcitim problems. Br J Educ Psychol 1998, 68(3):387-394.
• [57]Dooley JJ, Shaw T, Cross D: The association between the mental health and behavioural problems of students and their reactions to cyber-victimization. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012, 9(2):275-289.
• [58]Dehue F, Bolman C, Völlink T: Cyberbullying: youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. Cyber Psychol Behav 2008, 11(2):217-223.
• [59]Acirak OT: Psychiatric symptomatology as predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian J Educ Res 2009, 34:167-184.
• [60]Riebel JRSJ, Fischer UC: Cyberbullying in Germany – an exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychol Sci Q 2009, 51(3):298-314.
• [61]Perren S, Corcoran L, Cowie H, Dehue F, Garcia D, Mc Guckin C, Sevcikova A, Tsatsou P, Völlink T: Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents, and schools. Int J Conflict Violence 2012, 6(2):283-292.
• [62]Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H: High School Students’ Perceptions of Coping With Cyberbullying. Youth Soc 2012, 44(2):284-306.
• [63]Skrzypiec G, Slee P, Murray-Harvey R, Pereira B: School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how students cope? Sch Psychol Int 2011, 32(3):288-311.
• [64]Andreou E: Bully/Victim Problems and their Association with Coping Behaviour in Conflictual Peer Interactions Among School-age Children. Educ Psychol 2001, 21(1):59-66.
• [65]Hunter SC, Boyle JME: Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. Br J Educ Psychol 2004, 74(1):83-107.
• [66]Perry DG, Hodges EVE, Egan SK, Juvonen J, Graham S: Determinants of Chronic Victimization by Peers: A Review and New Model of Family Influence. In Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 2001:73-104.
• [67]Kanetsuna T, Smith PK, Morita Y: Coping with bullying at school: children's recommended strategies and attitudes to school-based interventions in England and Japan. Aggress Behav 2006, 32(6):570-580.
• [68]Völlink T, Bolman CAW, Dehue F, Jacobs NCL: Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully-victims and Children not Involved in Bullying. J Commun Applied Soc Psychol 2013, 23(1):7-24.
• [69]Neary A, Joseph S: Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among school girls. Personal Individ Differ 1994, 16(1):183-186.
• [70]Jacobs NCL, Dehue F, Völlink T, Lechner L: Determinants of adolescents’ ineffective and improved coping with cyberbullying: a Delphi study. J Adolesc 2014, 37(4):373-385.
• [71]Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S: Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q 2010, 25(2):65-83.
• [72]Bauman S: Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. J Early Adolesc 2010, 30(6):803-833.
• [73]Ellis A: The essence of RET. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 1984, 2(1):19-25.
• [74]Ellis A: Changing Rational-emotive therapy (RET) to Rational, emotive behavior therapy (REBT). J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 1995, 13(2):85-89.
• [75]Ringrose HJ, Nijenhuis EH: Bang zijn voor andere kinderen. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1986.
• [76]Ellis A: Overcoming Destructive Beliefs, Feelings and Behaviors: New Directions for Rational Emotive Therapy. New York: Prometheus Books; 2001.
• [77]MacInnes D: The theories underpinning rational emotive behaviour therapy: where's the supportive evidence? Int J Nurs Stud 2004, 41(6):685-695.
• [78]Erdur-Baker Ö: Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc 2010, 12(1):109-125.
• [79]Hinduja S, Patchin JW: Offline consequences of online victimization. J Sch Violence 2007, 6(3):89-112.
• [80]Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh Y, Hubbard A, Boyce WT: School Bullying and Youth Violence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006, 63:1035-1041.
• [81]Gonzalez JE, Nelson JR, Gutkin TB, Saunders A, Galloway A, Shwery CS: Rational Emotive Therapy With Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis. J Emot Behav Disord 2004, 12(4):222-235.
• [82]Banks T, Zionts P: REBT Used with Children and Adolescents who have Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Educational Settings: A Review of the Literature. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 2009, 27(1):51-65.
• [83]Woods S, Wolke D, Nowicki S, Hall L: Emotion recognition abilities and empathy of victims of bullying. Child Abuse Negl 2009, 33(5):307-311.
• [84]Nowicki S Jr, Duke MP: Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale. J Nonverbal Behav 1994, 18(1):9-35.
• [85]Kokkinos C, Kipritsi E: The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Soc Psychol Educ 2011, 15(1):41-58.
• [86]Austin EJ, Saklofske DH, Egan V: Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Personal Individ Differ 2005, 38(3):547-558.
• [87]Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, Daciuk J, Solomon S: Cyber Bullying Behaviors Among Middle and High School Students. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010, 80(3):362-374.
• [88]Price M, Dalgleish J: Cyberbullying: experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Stud Australia 2010, 29(2):51-59.
• [89]Fanti KA, Demetriou AG, Hawa VV: A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012, 9(2):168-181.
• [90]Kochenderfer-Ladd B: Peer Victimization: The Role of Emotions in Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping. Soc Dev 2004, 13(3):329-349.
• [91]Cross D, Monks H, Campbell MA, Spears B, Slee P: School-based strategies to address cyber bullying. Centre for Strategic Education Occasional Papers 2011, 119:1-12.
• [92]Boulton MJ, Smith PK, Cowie H: Short-Term Longitudinal Relationships Between Children’s Peer Victimization/Bullying Experiences and Self-Perceptions Evidence for Reciprocity. Sch Psychol Int 2010, 31(3):296-311.
• [93]Jones SE, Manstead ASR, Livingstone AG: Ganging up or sticking together? Group processes and children's responses to text-message bullying. Br J Psychol 2011, 102(1):71-96.
• [94]Camodeca M, Goossens FA: Children's opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educ Res 2005, 47(1):93-105.
• [95]Vandebosch H, van Cleemput K: Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles for bullies and victims. New Media Soc 2009, 11(8):1349-1371.
• [96]Hinduja S, Patchin JW: Bullying beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. California: Corwin press; 2009.
• [97]Valcke M, De Wever B, Van Keer H, Schellens T: Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Comput Educ 2011, 57(1):1292-1305.
• [98]Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RAC, Van Empelen P, Brug J: Intervention Mapping: Protocol for Applying Health Psychology Theory to Prevention Programmes. J Health Psychol 2004, 9(1):85-98.
• [99]Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: a Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
• [100]Bandura A: Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educ Psychol 1993, 28(2):117-148.
• [101]Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L: Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000.
• [102]de Vries H, Kremers SPJ, Smeets T, Brug J, Eijmael K: The Effectiveness of Tailored Feedback and Action Plans in an Intervention Addressing Multiple Health Behaviors. Am J Health Promot 2008, 22(6):417-425.
• [103]Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M: Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutri 2003, 77(4):1028S-1034S.
• [104]McManus IC, Livingston G, Katona C: The attractions of medicine: the generic motivations of medical school applicants in relation to demography, personality and achievement. BMC Med Educ 2006, 6:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [105]Caspi A, Bem DJ: Personality Continuity and Change across the Life Course. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Edited by Pervin LA. New York: Guilford Press; 1990:549-575.
• [106]Petty RE, Cacioppo JT: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer; 1986:1-24.
• [107]Bandura A: Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
• [108]Woolfolk A: Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2010.
• [109]Jackson RA, Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Gerbert B: Improving diet and exercise in pregnancy with Video Doctor counseling: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 83(2):203-209.
• [110]Vandelanotte C, Mummery WK: Qualitative and quantitative research into the development and feasibility of a video-tailored physical activity intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8(1):70. BioMed Central Full Text
• [111]Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R: Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health 2005, 20(2):143-160.
• [112]Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B: Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol 2005, 35(4):565-576.
• [113]Leventhal H, Singer R, Jones S: Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1965, 2(1):20-29.
• [114]Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P: Implementation intentions: Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz. 2008.
• [115]Sheeran P, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM: The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 2005, 31(1):87-98.
• [116]Reuter T, Ziegelmann JP, Wiedemann AU, Geiser C, Lippke S, Schüz B, Schwarzer R: Changes in Intentions, Planning, and Self-efficacy Predict Changes in Behaviors: An Application of Latent True Change Modeling. J Health Psychol 2010, 15(6):935-947.
• [117]van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, Wigger S, de Vries H: Relapse prevention in a national smoking cessation contest: Effects of coping planning. Br J Health Psychol 2008, 13(3):525-535.
• [118]Wiedemann AU, Lippke S, Reuter T, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R: How planning facilitates behaviour change: Additive and interactive effects of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Soc Psychol 2011, 41(1):42-51.
• [119]Araújo-Soares V, McIntyre T, Sniehotta FF: Predicting changes in physical activity among adolescents: the role of self-efficacy, intention, action planning and coping planning. Health Educ Res 2009, 24(1):128-139.
• [120]Rivers I, Poteat PV, Noret N, Ashurst N: Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. Sch Psychol Q 2009, 24(4):211.
• [121]Achenbach TM: Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF Profiles: Department of Psychiatry. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Burlington; 1991.
• [122]Geerlings M, Lissenburg L: Evaluatieonderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de cursus ‘Plezier op school’. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht; 2005.
• [123]Choi BCK, Pak AWP: A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis 2005, 2(1):A13.