Risk factors for secondary transmission of Shigella infection within households: implications for current prevention policy

BMC Infectious Diseases

Anneke van den Hoek³  Alje P van Dam²  Gerard JB Sonder³  Jane Whelan¹  Lian Boveé¹ 

[1] Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, PO Box 2200, Amsterdam, 1000 CE, the Netherlands;Department of Medical Microbiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG Hospital), Postbus 95500, Amsterdam, 1090 HM, the Netherlands;Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands

关键词: Preschool;    Child;    Infectious;    Disease transmission;    Community-acquired infections/epidemiology;    Infection control;    Shigella;   

Others  :  1158717
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-12-347

 received in 2012-06-08, accepted in 2012-12-05,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Internationally, guidelines to prevent secondary transmission of Shigella infection vary widely. Cases, their contacts with diarrhoea, and those in certain occupational groups are frequently excluded from work, school, or daycare. In the Netherlands, all contacts attending pre-school (age 0–3) and junior classes in primary school (age 4–5), irrespective of symptoms, are also excluded pending microbiological clearance. We identified risk factors for secondary Shigella infection (SSI) within households and evaluated infection control policy in this regard.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of households where a laboratory confirmed Shigella case was reported in Amsterdam (2002–2009) included all households at high risk for SSI (i.e. any household member under 16 years). Cases were classified as primary, co-primary or SSIs. Using univariable and multivariable binomial regression with clustered robust standard errors to account for household clustering, we examined case and contact factors (Shigella serotype, ethnicity, age, sex, household size, symptoms) associated with SSI in contacts within households.

Results

SSI occurred in 25/ 337 contacts (7.4%): 20% were asymptomatic, 68% were female, and median age was 14 years (IQR: 4–38). In a multivariable model adjusted for case and household factors, only diarrhoea in contacts was associated with SSI (IRR 8.0, 95% CI:2.7-23.8). In a second model, factors predictive of SSI in contacts were the age of case (0–3 years (IRR_{case≥6 years}:2.5, 95% CI:1.1-5.5) and 4–5 years (IRR_{case≥6 years}:2.2, 95% CI:1.1-4.3)) and household size (>6 persons (IRR_{2-4 persons} 3.4, 95% CI:1.2-9.5)).

Conclusions

To identify symptomatic and asymptomatic SSI, faecal screening should be targeted at all household contacts of preschool cases (0–3 years) and cases attending junior class in primary school (4–5 years) and any household contact with diarrhoea. If screening was limited to these groups, only one asymptomatic adult carrier would have been missed, and potential exclusion of 70 asymptomatic contacts <6 years old from school or daycare, who were contacts of cases of all ages, could have been avoided.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Boveé et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]American Public Health Association: Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 19th edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC; 2008.
• [2]van Pelt W, de Wit MA, Wannet WJ, Ligtvoet EJ, Widdowson MA, et al.: Laboratory surveillance of bacterial gastroenteric pathogens in The Netherlands, 1991–2001. Epidemiol Infect 2003, 130:431-441.
• [3]Dupont H: Shigella species. In Mandell, Douglas and Benett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious DIseases. 6th edition. Edited by Mandell G, Benett J, Dolin R. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia; 2005:2655-2661.
• [4]Queensland Government: Shigella infection (Shigellosis): Queensland Health Guidelines for Public Health Units. Queensland Government, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; 2010.
• [5]American Academy of Pediatrics: Red Book: 2009 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th edition. Edited by Pickering L, Baker C, Long S, McMillan J. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL; 2009:593-596.
• [6]PHLS Advisory Committee on Gastrointestinal Infections: Preventing person-to-person spread following gastrointestinal infections: guidelines for public health physicians and environmental health officers. Commun Dis Public Health 2004, 7(4):362-384.
• [7]National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM): Reporting of infectious diseases in accordance with the Public Health Act. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) [In Dutch], Bilthoven; 2008.
• [8]Vermaak M, Langendam M, van den Hoek J, Peerbooms PG, Coutinho R: Shigellosis in Amsterdam, 1991–1998: prevention and results of contact tracing [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000, 144:1688-1690.
• [9]National Center for the coordination of Infectious Disease Control (LCI): LCI Directive: Shigellosis. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven; 2011.
• [10]Rogers WH: Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19–23. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints 1993, 3:88-94.
• [11]Williams RL: A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 2000, 56:645-646.
• [12]De Schrijver K, Bertrand S, Gutierrez Garitano I, Van den Branden D, Van Schaeren J: Outbreak of Shigella sonnei infections in the Orthodox Jewish community of Antwerp, Belgium, April to August 2008. Euro Surveill 2011, 16(14):pii=19838.
• [13]Khan AI, Talukder KA, Huq S, Mondal D, Malek MA, Dutta DK, et al.: Detection of intra-familial transmission of shigella infection using conventional serotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Epidemiol Infect 2006, 134(3):605-611.
• [14]Baaten GG, Sonder GJ, Van Der Loeff MF, Coutinho RA, Van Den Hoek A: Faecal-orally transmitted diseases among travelers are decreasing due to better hygienic standards at travel destination. J Travel Med 2010, 17(5):322-328.
• [15]Dutch Tourist Board and NIPO Research: Continuous Holiday Survey [in Dutch]. Dutch Tourist Board and NIPO research, Leidschendam; 1999–2007.
• [16]Jonsson J, Alvarez-Castillo Mdel C, Sanz JC, Ramiro R, Ballester E, Fernanez M, et al.: Late detection of a shigellosis outbreak in a school in Madrid. Euro Surveill 2005, 10(10):268-270.
• [17]Mohle-Boetani JC, Stapleton M, Finger R, Bean NH, Poundstone J, Blake PA, et al.: Communitywide shigellosis: control of an outbreak and risk factors in child day-care centers. Am J Public Health 1995, 85(6):812-816.
• [18]Arvelo W, Hinkle C, Nguyen T, et al.: Transmission risk factors and treatment of pediatric shigellosis during a large daycare center-associated outbreak of multidrug resistant Shigella sonnei. Implications for the management of shigellosis outbreaks among children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009, 28:976-980.
• [19]Werber D, Mason B, Evans M, Salmon R: Preventing household transmission of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 infection: Promptly separating siblings might be the key. CID 2008, 46:1189-1196.
• [20]de Boer RF, Ott A, Kesztyus B, Kooistra-Smid AM: Improved detection of five major gastrointestinal pathogens by use of a molecular screening approach. J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48(11):4140-4146.
• [21]Centers for Disease Control (CDC): Community outbreaks of shigellosis--United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990, 39(30):509-513. 19