Computer game-based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students’ knowledge retention

BMC Medical Education

Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade²  Fernanda Chiarion Sassi¹  Silmara Rondon¹ 

[1] Department of Physiotherapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Rua Cipotânea, 51 – Cidade Universitária, CEP: 05360-160, São Paulo/S.P, Brazil

关键词: Computer-assisted instruction;    Learning;    Stomatognathic system;    Physiology;    Anatomy;    Language and hearing sciences;    Speech;   

Others  :  1138994
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-13-30

 received in 2012-09-05, accepted in 2013-02-20,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Educational computer games are examples of computer-assisted learning objects, representing an educational strategy of growing interest. Given the changes in the digital world over the last decades, students of the current generation expect technology to be used in advancing their learning requiring a need to change traditional passive learning methodologies to an active multisensory experimental learning methodology. The objective of this study was to compare a computer game-based learning method with a traditional learning method, regarding learning gains and knowledge retention, as means of teaching head and neck Anatomy and Physiology to Speech-Language and Hearing pathology undergraduate students.

Methods

Students were randomized to participate to one of the learning methods and the data analyst was blinded to which method of learning the students had received. Students’ prior knowledge (i.e. before undergoing the learning method), short-term knowledge retention and long-term knowledge retention (i.e. six months after undergoing the learning method) were assessed with a multiple choice questionnaire. Students’ performance was compared considering the three moments of assessment for both for the mean total score and for separated mean scores for Anatomy questions and for Physiology questions.

Results

Students that received the game-based method performed better in the pos-test assessment only when considering the Anatomy questions section. Students that received the traditional lecture performed better in both post-test and long-term post-test when considering the Anatomy and Physiology questions.

Conclusions

The game-based learning method is comparable to the traditional learning method in general and in short-term gains, while the traditional lecture still seems to be more effective to improve students’ short and long-term knowledge retention.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Rondon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Berman NB, Fall LH, Maloney CG, Levine DA: Computer-assisted instruction in clinical education: a roadmap to increasing CAI implementation. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2008, 13:373-383.
• [2]Norman G, Schmidt H: The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Academ Med. 1992, 67(9):557-565.
• [3]Piemme T: Computer-assisted learning and evaluation in medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1988, 260:367-372.
• [4]Clayden G, Wilson B: Computer-assisted learning in medical education. Med Educ 1988, 22(5):456-467.
• [5]Prensky M: Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon 2001, 9(5):1-6.
• [6]Deshpande AA, Huang SH: Simulation games in engineering education: a state-of-the-art review. J Comput Appl Eng Educ 2009.
• [7]Vogel M, Wood D: Love or hate it? medical students’ attitudes to computer-assisted learning. Med Educ 2002, 36(3):214-215.
• [8]Zemlin WR: Princípios de anatomia e fisiologia em fonoaudiologia. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2000.
• [9]Felício CM: Desenvolvimento normal das funções estomatognáticas. In Tratado de fonoaudiologia. 2nd edition. Edited by Fernandes FDM, Mendes BCA, Navas ALPGP. São Paulo: Roca; 2009:17-27.
• [10]Yuen HK, Fallis M, Martin-Harris B: A survey of head and neck cancer curriculum in United States speech language pathology masters programs. J Cancer Educ 2010, 25(4):556-9.
• [11]Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R: Anatomia Geral – Introdução. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 1971:3-9. [Anatomia - Estudo Regional do Corpo Humano]
• [12]Jang KS, Hwang SY, Park SJ, Kim YM, Kim MJ: Effects of a web-based teaching method on undergraduate nursing students’ learning of electrocardiography. J Nurs Educ 2005, 44:35-39.
• [13]Schneider PJ, Pederson CA, Montanya KR, Curran CR, Harpe SE, Boheneck W, Perratto B, Swain J, Wellmann KE: Improving the safety of medication using an interactive CD-ROM programme. Am J Health-Syst Ph. 2006, 63:59-64.
• [14]Criley JM, Keiner J, Boker JR, Criley SR, Warde CM: Innovative web-based multimedia curriculum improves cardiac examination competency of residents. J Hosp Med 2008, 3(2):124-133.
• [15]Kalet AL, Song HS, Sarpel U, Schwartz R, Brenner J, Ark TK, Plass J: Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module. Med Teach 2012, 34:833-839.
• [16]Paalman MH: Why teach anatomy? anatomists respond. Anat Rec B New Anat 2000, 261(1):1-2.
• [17]Goldberg HR, McKhann GM: Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment. Adv Physiol Educ 2000, 23:59-66.
• [18]Ohrn MA, van Oostrom JH, van Meurs WL: A comparison of tradicional textbook and interactive computer learning of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 1997, 84(3):657-661.
• [19]Sweller J: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Sci 1988, 12:257-285.
• [20]Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas FGWC: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 1998, 10(3):251-296.
• [21]Rummel N, Spada H: Learning to collaborate: an instruction approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. J Learn Sci 2005, 14(2):201-241.
• [22]Pearson J: Investigating ICT, using problem-based learning in face-to-face and online learning environments. Comput Educ 2006, 47(1):56-73.
• [23]Kester L, Lehnen C, Van Gerven PWM, Kirschner PA: Just-in-time schematic supportive information presentation during cognitive skill acquisition. Comput Hum Behav 2006, 22(1):93-116.
• [24]Silva AS, Delacruz GC: Hybrid reality games reframed – potencial uses in educational contexts. Game Cult 2006, 1(3):231-251.
• [25]Thomas D, Brown JS: The play of imagination – extending the literary mind. Game Cult 2007, 2(2):149-172.
• [26]Akl EA, Mustafa R, Slomk T, Alawneh A, Vedavalli A, Schünemann HJ: An educational game for teaching clinical practice guidelines to internal medicine residents: development, feasibility and acceptability. BMC Med Educ 2008, 8:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Ebner M, Holzinger A: Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: an example from civil engineering. Comput Educ 2007, 49:873-890.
• [28]Prensky M: Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
• [29]Hong J-C, Cheng C-L, Hwang M-Y, Lee C-K, Chang H-Y: Assessing the educational values of digital games. J Comput Assist Lear 2009, 25:423-437.
• [30]Kalyuga S: Instructional designs for the development of transferable knowledge and skills: a cognitive load perspective. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25:332-338.
• [31]Huang WH: Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment. Comput Hum Behav 2011, 27:694-704.
• [32]Gee JP: Good video games and good learning: collected essays in video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing; 2007.
• [33]Driskell JE, Willis RP, Cooper C: Effect of over-learning on retention. J Appl Psychol 1992, 77:615-622.
• [34]Walliser B: A spectrum of equilibration processes in games. J Evol Econ 1998, 8:67-87.
• [35]Coyne R: Mindless repetition: learning from computer games. Design Stud 2003, 24:199-212.
• [36]Shaffer DW, Squire KR, Halverson R, Gee JP: Video games and the future of learning. http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/gappspaper1.pdf webcite
• [37]Liu C-C, Cheng Y-B, Tsai C-C, Huang C-C: The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem-solving. Comput Educ 2011, 57(3):1907-1918.
• [38]Kim S, Chang MD: Computer games for the math achievement of diverse students. Educ Technol Soc 2010, 13(3):224-232.
• [39]Akl : The effect of educational games on medical students’ learning outcomes: a systematic review: BEME guide No 14. Med Teach 2010, 32:16-27.
• [40]Boreham N, Foster R, Mawer G: The phenytoin game: its effect on decision skills. Simulat Games 1989, 20(3):292-299.32.
• [41]Kanthan R, Senger JL: The impact of specially designed digital game-based learning in undergraduate pathology and medical education. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011, 135:135-142.
• [42]Papastergiou M: Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: a literature review. Comput Educ 2009, 53(3):603-622.
• [43]Kiili K: Digital game-based learning: towards an experiential gaming model. Internet High Educ 2005, 8(1):12-24.
• [44]Csikszentmihalyi M: Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1975.
• [45]Seikel JA, King DW, Drumright DG: Anatesse 2.0: Electronic classroom manager to accompany Anatomy and Physiology for Speech, Language and Hearing. [CD-ROM]. 3rd edition. United States of America: Thomas Delmar Learning; 2005.
• [46]Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W: Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th edition. Ilinois: Richard D. Irwing; 1996.
• [47]Annetta LA, Minogue J, Holmes SY, Cheng MT: Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Comput Educ 2009, 53:74-85.
• [48]Brom C, Preuss M, Klement D: Are educational computer micro-games engaging and effective for knowledge acquisition at high-schools? a quasi-experimental study. Comput Educ 2011, 57:1971-1988.
• [49]Egenfeldt-Nielsen S: Beyond edutainment: Exploring the educational potential of computer games. PhDthesis. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen; 2005.
• [50]Wong WL, Shen C, Nocera L, Carriazo E, Tang F, Bugga S, Narayanan H, Wang H, Ritterfeld U: Serious video game effectiveness. New York: ACM Digital Library; 2007:49-55. [Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology]
• [51]Selby G, Walker V, Diwkar V: A comparison of teaching methods: interactive lecture versus game playing. Med Teach 2007, 29:972-974.
• [52]Bonanno P, Kommers PAM: Gender differences and styles in the use of digital games. Educ Psychol 2005, 25(1):13-41.
• [53]Jean JD, Upitis R, Koch C, Young J: The story of phoenix quest: how girls respond to a prototype language and mathematics computer game. Gender Educ 1999, 11(2):207-223.
• [54]Bonanno P, Kommers PAM: Exploring the influence of gender and gaming competence on attitude towards using instructional games. British J Educ Technol 2008, 39(1):97-109.
• [55]Fengfeng K: A case study of computer gaming for math: engaged learning from gameplay? Comput Educ 2009, 51(4):1609-1620.
• [56]Papastergiou M: Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput Educ 2009, 52(1):1-12.
• [57]Kron FW, Gjerde CL, Sen A, Fetters MD: Medical student attitudes toward video games and related new media technologies in medical education. BMC Med Educ 2010, 10:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [58]Ketelhut DJ, Schifter ER, Kidder LH: Teachers and game-based learning: improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption. Comput Educ 2011, 56:539-546.
• [59]Zayim N, Yildirim S, Saka O: Technology adoption of medical faculty in teaching: differentiating factors in adopter categories. Educ Technol Soc 2006, 9(2):213-222.