Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology

BMC Nursing

Janet Binette¹  Katherine E Timmermans¹  Sharolyn Mossey²  June M Raymond¹  Phyllis Montgomery²  Laura A Killam¹ 

[1] School of Health Sciences and Emergency Services, Cambrian College, 1400 Barrydowne Road, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada;School of Nursing, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, Canada

关键词: Student perspectives;    Clinical learning;    Safety;    Q-Methodology;    Nursing education;   

Others  :  1092179
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6955-11-26

 received in 2012-05-23, accepted in 2012-10-26,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment.

Methods

Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives.

Results

A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site.

Conclusions

Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Killam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Richardson A, Storr J: Patient safety: a literature review on the impact of nursing empowerment, leadership and collaboration. Int Nurs Rev 2010, 57(1):12-21.
• [2]World Health Organization: Patient safety curriculum guide: Multi-professional edition. Malta, Greece; 2011.
• [3]Canadian Nurses Association: Position statement: patient safety. Ottawa, Canada; 2009.
• [4]Groves PS, Meisenbach RJ, Scott-Cawiezell J: Keeping patients safe in healthcare organizations: a structuration theory of safety culture. J Adv Nurs 2011, 67(8):1846-1855.
• [5]Vaismoradi M, Salsali M, Marck P: Patient safety: nursing students’ perspectives and the role of nursing education to provide safe care. Int Nurs Rev 2011, 58:434-442.
• [6]Weissman JS, Rothschild JM, Bendavid E, Sprivulis P, Cook EF, Evans RS, Kaganova Y, Bender M, David-Kasdan J, Haug P, et al.: Hospital workload and adverse events. Medical care 2007, 45(5):448-455.
• [7]Canadian Health Service Research Foundation: Staffing for safety: a synthesis of the evidence on nurse staffing and patient safety. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Service Research Foundation; 2006.
• [8]Kingston-Riechers J, Ospina M, Jonsson E, Childs P, McLeod L, Maxted J: Patient safety in primary care. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Patient Safety Institute and BC Patient Safety and Quality Council; 2010.
• [9]Barker JH: Q-methodology: an alternative approach to research in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2008, 28(8):917-925.
• [10]Johnstone MJ, Kanitsaki O: The ethics and practical importance of defining, distinguishing and disclosing nursing errors: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2006, 43(3):367-376.
• [11]Neudorf K, Dyck N, Scott D, Davidson Dick D: Nursing education: a catalyst for the patient safety movement. Healthc Q 2008, 11(3):35-39.
• [12]Palmieri PA, DeLucia PR, Peterson LT, Ott TE, Green A: The anatomy and physiology of error in adverse health care events. Patient Safety and Health Care Management 2008, 7:33-68.
• [13]Baker CR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, Etchells E, Ghali WA, Hébert P, Majumdar SR, et al.: The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004, 170(11):1678-1686.
• [14]Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing: Position statement: patient safety and nursing education. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing; 2006.
• [15]Dick DD, Weisbrod L, Gregory D, Dyck N, Neudorf K: Case study: on the leading edge of new curricula concepts: systems and safety in nursing education. Nurs Leadersh 2006, 19(3):34-42.
• [16]Gregory DM, Guse LW, Dick DD, Russell CK: Patient safety: where is nursing education? J Nurs Educ 2007, 46(2):79-82.
• [17]Killam LA, Luhanga F, Bakker D: Characteristics of unsafe undergraduate nursing students in clinical practice: an integrative literature review. J Nurs Educ 2011, 50(8):437-446.
• [18]Scanlan JM, Care WD, Gessler S: Dealing with the unsafe student in clinical practice. Nurse Educ 2001, 26(1):23-27.
• [19]Killam LA, Montgomery P, Luhanga FL, Adamic P, Carter LM: Views on unsafe nursing students in clinical learning. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2010, 7(1):Article36.
• [20]Frank J, Brien S (Eds): The safety competencies Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Patient Safety Institute; 2008.
• [21]Jokelainen M, Jamookeeah D, Tossavainen K, Turunen H: Building organizational capacity for effective mentorship of pre-registration nursing students during placement learning: Finnish and British mentors’ conceptions. Int J Nurs Pract 2011, 17(5):509-517.
• [22]Sokol P, Cummins DS: A needs assessment for patient safety education: focusing on the nursing perspective. Nurs Econ 2002, 20(5):245-248.
• [23]Wakefield A, Attree M, Braidman I, Carlisle C, Johnson M, Cooke H: Patient safety: do nursing and medical curricula address this theme? Nurse Educ Today 2005, 25(4):333-340.
• [24]Attree M, Cooke H, Wakefield A: Patient safety in an English pre-registration nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ Pract 2008, 8(4):239-248.
• [25]Vaismoradi M: Nursing education curriculum for improving patient safety. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2012, 2(1):101-104.
• [26]Chenot TM, Daniel LG: Frameworks for patient safety in the nursing curriculum. J Nurs Educ 2010, 49(10):559-568.
• [27]Ebright PR, Carter Kooken WS, Moody RC MA: Mindful attention to complexity: implications for teaching and learning patient safety in nursing. Annu Rev Nurs Educ 2006, 4:339-359.
• [28]Howard JN: The missing link: dedicated patient safety education within top-ranked US nursing school curricula. J Patient Saf 2010, 6(3):165-171.
• [29]Saintsing D, Gibson LM, Pennington AW: The novice nurse and clinical decision-making: how to avoid errors. J Nurs Manag 2011, 19(3):354-359.
• [30]Sherwood G: Integrating quality and safety science in nursing education and practice. J Res Nurs 2011, 16(3):226-240.
• [31]Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Barnsteiner J, Disch J, Johnson J, Mitchell P, Sullivan DT, Warren J: Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook 2007, 55(3):122-131.
• [32]Sullivan DT, Hirst D, Cronenwett L: Assessing quality and safety competencies of graduating prelicensure nursing students. Nurs Outlook 2009, 57(6):323-331.
• [33]Feng X, Bobay K, Weiss M: Patient safety culture in nursing: a dimensional concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008, 63(3):310-319.
• [34]Ebright PR, Urden L, Patterson E, Chalko B: Themes surrounding novice nurse near-miss and adverse-event situations. J Nurs Adm 2004, 34(11):531-538.
• [35]Akhtar-Danesh N, Baumann A, Cordingley L: Q-methodology in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity. West J Nurs Res 2008, 30(6):759-773.
• [36]Brown SR: Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press; 1980.
• [37]Schmolck P: PQMethod. 211th edition. Neubiberg: University of the Bundeswehr Munich; 2002.
• [38]Mossey S, Montgomery P, Raymond JM, Killam LA: Typology of undergraduate nursing students’ unsafe clinical practices: Q-methodology. J Nurs Educ 2012, 51(5):245-253.
• [39]Watts S, Stenner P: Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol 2005, 2:67-91.
• [40]Gallagher K, Porock D: The use of interviews in Q methodology: card content analysis. Nurs Res 2010, 59(4):295-300.
• [41]Kragelund L: Student nurses’ learning processes in interaction with psychiatric patients: a qualitative investigation. Nurse Educ Pract 2011, 11(4):260-267.
• [42]Brown Y, Neudorf K, Poitras C, Rodger K: Unsafe student clinical performance calls for a systematic approach. Can Nurse 2007, 103(3):29-32.
• [43]Di Vito-Thomas P: Nursing Student Stories on Learning How to Think Like a Nurse. Nurse Educ 2005, 30(3):133-136.
• [44]Halbach JL, Sullivan LL: Teaching Medical Students About Medical Errors and Patient Safety: Evaluation of a Required Curriculum. Acad Med 2005, 80(6):600-606.
• [45]Butterworth T: Building capacity and capability in patient safety, innovation and service improvement: an English case study. J Res Nurs 2011, 16(3):254-270.